Who are you voting for?

[Oldgrunt]

I've voting for obama. He is getting things done and does what he says.

You're right Otis, he is getting things done. He is destroying the country, just as he said he would.

[BC1]

Ah, this logic again. Sheep patrol. Somehow not voting for someone creates two votes. Amazing. It's like fusion or perpetual motion. You are a scientific genius. Pls give us the key to world hunger!

Otis, for those without a degree in math it's a delta we're talking about. The affect of a no-vote or third-party vote mathematically has a VIRTUAL double affect. For example, when you say I don't have no money, it actually means you do have money.

[Ringo]

I've voting for obama. He is getting things done and does what he says.

The Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-lateral Commission, Club of Rome and the New Age Movement have colluded setting up the final form of world power. Proof of which is in the everyday words being used by these same people such as New World Order. This was once a hush hush phrase but no more. They are haughty in their belief that no one can stop them now and is why they are not afraid to use this term. Henry Kissinger, a member of the all the above went so far as to say that Obama was groomed to lead the New World Order. So yes, Obama is doing exactly what he said he would do, fundamentally change America. Aside from the outright depravity permeating our American society, which is no small thing, Obama is leading our country--physically and spiritually-- headlong into alliance with the most antichrist system known to the world.

[BC1]

You're right Otis, he is getting things done. He is destroying the country, just as he said he would.

He started with a $6 trillion debt. Blamed Bush. Now we have a $16 trillion debt. Can't blame Bush anymore. He's the kid who denies eating the peanut buuter while it's all over his face.







[/QUOTE]

[BC1]

Otis, you are on the wrong app. You need to be on Media Matters with the other simpletons.

Yes, and don't forget Ann Romney's horse and Mitt's taxes are the real issues, not the economy, debt, jobs, energy, etc.

Mitt's tactic is actually brilliant. Keep them spinning in a frenzy trying to get the taxes so they can continue the class warfare... and then release them near the election.

[Oldgrunt]

I'm voting for Tom Hoefling.
I like the platform of America's Party:

Mission
Our mission, in brief, is to:

Honor God.

Defend the God-given, unalienable right to life, liberty, and private property of every innocent person, from creation until natural death.

Defend the God-given institution of one man-one woman marriage and the natural family.

Defend the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

Defend our national sovereignty, security, and borders through a firm Peace through Strength foreign policy.

Defend the federalist form of representative, republican, constitutionally-limited self-government -- based on the rule of law, not of men -- bequeathed to us by our forebears.

Defend the Constitution of the United States, and demand that the oath of office be kept by every officer of American government, in every branch, and at every level.

(BOLD is my emphasis)

It seems to me that the mission of your party is the same as what most members on here espouse. Most, not all. That, in itself, is not bad since we all have the right to think and act as we see fit. No matter how good Tom Hoefling is, he is not widely known except for those in your organization. I will not vote for him for a couple of reasons. There is no way a third party is going to win this election and I will not throw my vote away knowing damn well it will not count for anything. Romney will be more true to your mission statement than Obama and I would think that should be apparent by now. Obama is the antithesis of everything you are espousing so why would anyone in his right mind not vote for the one who stands a chance of beating him?

[Tripletap]

Otis, for those without a degree in math it's a delta we're talking about. The affect of a no-vote or third-party vote mathematically has a VIRTUAL double affect. For example, when you say I don't have no money, it actually means you do have money.

I think Otis's head just exploded.....

[Rabbitcreekok]

Sounds like me...,but in reverse. I cannot vote for Romney, no matter what. Stiff, rich, liar, holier-than-thou POS. I will not buy into all the socialist, destroying our country hyperbole and BS that is popular here although I am a gun owner and believer in freedom. Sorry but I have yet to be shown what freedoms I have lost - lots of rhetoric and predictions, birth certificates, transcripts, Alex Jones and Glenn Beck made up BS, lots of WND stories, but no facts. So far the only freedom I seem to have lost is to pay for the health care of those who choose not to pay for their own. If you define freedom as the right not to pay for insurance, then I define it as deal with it when you are Ill...don't expect me to do so. This used to be called the individual responsibility mandate...and a bit more individual responsibility would be a damned good thing. I refuse to let Wayne LaPierre make up a future and have me jump like a trained frog. Here I am in the echo chamber where everyone posts the stories they find from places that agree with what they already believe...no data, just emotional BS. Solid citizens who don't car if they are mushrooms.

I have no love for Obama, but I not trust a damned thing Romney says and believe he will do whatever he is told...after 8 years of Bush I have had enough of that. I would love to have a better candidate to vote for, but between the two, I cannot vote for Romney. Rich fat cats who do not know what my life is like just piss me off, my betters which say I do not need to know about their taxes or their policies and how they might line their own pockets just piss me off.

Crappy choices and we will end up living with whomever the majority elect.

I hate to say this, The Dark, but your name says just where you live. I am surprised to see the Army Sgt. stripes as your avatar, since I don't see how military folks can support anyone who is so against the military.

But wait, it was Bammer who got Bin Laden, not the Navy Seals.

[JohnD13]

I've voting for obama. He is getting things done and does what he says.

Yes indeed, he does what he says. Fundamentally changing America into a third world nation. Policies that put millions out of work, socialized medicine on the horizon, endangering the futures of the young and the elderly, allowing our borders to become nothing more than a line on a map, giving 800,000 plus ILLEGAL aliens a pass to stay in this country, with government benefits of course, and hoping they'll all vote Democratic. He's a man of his word alright, but you can't trust a thing he says.

I'll vote for Romney because even if I don't think he can turn all the "fundamental changes" around in even two terms, I think that he at least has an idea of who we are as Americans, which our current "occupier" of the White House does not.

[rmscadd]

Obama is doing exactly what he said he would do (at least 1 thing). He said that he would "Fundamentally Change America" and he is doing that.