Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52
Like Tree115Likes

Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama

This is a discussion on Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama within the Politics forums, part of the Main Category category; Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama November 7, 2012 By Kris Zane On Sunday November 4, late in the day, ...

  1. #1
    mmckee1952 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,388

    Default Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama

    Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama

    November 7, 2012 By Kris Zane


    On Sunday November 4, late in the day, an odd video appeared (or rather was buried) on CBS’s website, entitled “Obama Suspects Libya Attack Targeted Americans.”

    It was odd in that for several weeks, the Obama administration had finally dropped the idiotic narrative that the attack on the Benghazi consulate was caused by a “mob turned violent” over an obscure anti-Muslim video that no one had seen.

    A closer look at the video shows that it was in fact taped on September 12, a few hours after Obama made vague remarks about the attack in the Rose Garden. That it was part of a 60 Minutes interview that CBS had clearly suppressed.

    Why was the video suppressed?

    It didn’t fit the narrative. Even though we later found out that Obama watched the attack on the Benghazi consulate in real time. Even though we later found out Obama had received an email that went directly to the White House Situation Room blaming the al-Qaeda-linked group Ansar al-Sharia, Obama in this suppressed video refused to call it terrorism. That Obama, in the suppressed video, oddly at the same time, thought the “mob turned violent over a anti-Muslim video” was equally ridiculous.

    It was obvious what Obama was trying to do in the interview. He wasn’t sure what lie he was going to tell the American people about the attack and wanted to be as vague as possible.

    But it wasn’t vague enough. It didn’t fit the narrative.

    So it had to be suppressed.

    What we now know is that Barack Hussein Obama was shipping weapons from Libya to Syria—arming the al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked Syrian rebels—yes, our enemies—with Ambassador Chris Stevens as the point man—and needed a cover story to keep it out of the public’s eyes.

    Arming of our enemies?

    That’s treason in my book.

    And if I remember correctly, that’s grounds for impeachment.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    49

    Default

    Obama lama is in for a second term no one in Washington is going to do anything. They do not have a set of balls to do anything.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wrs25936 View Post
    Obama lama is in for a second term no one in Washington is going to do anything. They do not have a set of balls to do anything.
    I wouldn't bet on that.
    Samuel Colt did more for equality in America than any civil rights activist.

  4. #4
    mmckee1952 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    2,388

    Default

    I can’t remember his name but the senator who headed the panel looking into the fast & furious fiasco might just be waiting for everything to settle down a bit until he sinks his teeth into this mess.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    TRIAD Area, NC
    Posts
    3,093

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mmckee1952 View Post
    Treason: Benghazi Revelations Could Sink Obama

    November 7, 2012 By Kris Zane


    On Sunday November 4, late in the day, an odd video appeared (or rather was buried) on CBS’s website, entitled “Obama Suspects Libya Attack Targeted Americans.”

    It was odd in that for several weeks, the Obama administration had finally dropped the idiotic narrative that the attack on the Benghazi consulate was caused by a “mob turned violent” over an obscure anti-Muslim video that no one had seen.

    A closer look at the video shows that it was in fact taped on September 12, a few hours after Obama made vague remarks about the attack in the Rose Garden. That it was part of a 60 Minutes interview that CBS had clearly suppressed.

    Why was the video suppressed?

    It didn’t fit the narrative. Even though we later found out that Obama watched the attack on the Benghazi consulate in real time. Even though we later found out Obama had received an email that went directly to the White House Situation Room blaming the al-Qaeda-linked group Ansar al-Sharia, Obama in this suppressed video refused to call it terrorism. That Obama, in the suppressed video, oddly at the same time, thought the “mob turned violent over a anti-Muslim video” was equally ridiculous.

    It was obvious what Obama was trying to do in the interview. He wasn’t sure what lie he was going to tell the American people about the attack and wanted to be as vague as possible.

    But it wasn’t vague enough. It didn’t fit the narrative.

    So it had to be suppressed.

    What we now know is that Barack Hussein Obama was shipping weapons from Libya to Syria—arming the al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked Syrian rebels—yes, our enemies—with Ambassador Chris Stevens as the point man—and needed a cover story to keep it out of the public’s eyes.

    Arming of our enemies?

    That’s treason in my book.

    And if I remember correctly, that’s grounds for impeachment.
    Put the pipe down (or adult beverage) and understand, this man and his administration is untouchable. I completely agree that this whole ordeal and MaoBama's involvement was treasonous BUT like DOJ and the rest of this corrupt administration the American People will NEVER get the true answers. As a caveat, I do believe this is part of the reason the Second Amendment is the Second Amendment. The ability of the people to protect its self from a tyrannical government.
    "The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." --author and philosopher Ayn Rand (1905-1982)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    TRIAD Area, NC
    Posts
    3,093

    Default

    Ill be waitng for the suits to show up now.
    "The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." --author and philosopher Ayn Rand (1905-1982)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    north east Iowa
    Posts
    1,251

    Default

    Hoping that our politicians will act in an honest and honorable way is a dream. Most don't even know the meaning of those two little words. They are much too afraid of the reaction of the media. Cowardice and dishonesty, after Tuesday's election, appear to be the main qualifications for a successful candidacy. The voters, thanks to our educational system and the media, have no idea of what truth is. Perhaps their ignorance is a protective mechanism against the horror that this country is destined face very soon.

  8. #8
    SR40c's Avatar
    SR40c is offline Done told her once...
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    2,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by the dark View Post
    Yea, I remember when Reagan was impeached for Iran-Contra...and all the arms we shipped to the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan when UBL was fighting the Russians, and working with Saddam against Iran. And W was a choir boy with all that fake intelligence that got Americans killed, warrantless spying and such. Foreign policy is full of such shady crap - has been for years. At this point all this looks like is more throwing **** at the wall to see what sticks.
    Reagan wasn't impeached. Seems all of you liberal jackasses are nothing more than delusional hacks if not pathological liars.


    I used to be a government-educated stooge. By the grace of God, I repent. -Robert Burris

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Southern Plains
    Posts
    919

    Default

    Only Andrew Johnson, and sick-willie klinton were the only presidents impeached. Both were acquitted by the senate.

    -Doc

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Congress may appoint a "special commitee" to look into the Libyan mess, they'll parade and huff & puff and blow a bunch of BS in front of the tv cameras for Fox, the only ones that will cover the story for a few weeks then the whole thing will dry up & blow away just like fast & furious because the mainstream media sure as hell won't cover anything negative about their little muslim posterboy.
    WHEN IN DOUBT EMPTY THE MAG !

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •