Chicago Tribune: Repeal the 2nd Amendment

[HK4U]

the tree hugging bit reminds me of a certain person we used to work with..... time to absorb energy ! ;]

Dr. Ying Yang I presume.

[Scarecrow]

let's just move the city of chicago to california or something.. let the retarded commies have that state.. it's going to fall in the ocean anyway...

[HK4U]

Here is what the Second Amendment Foundation had to say.


NEWS RELEASE
SAF CALLS CHICAGO TRIBUNE PLEA TO REPEAL 2A ‘UNCONSCIONABLE’

BELLEVUE, WA – The Chicago Tribune’s call for repeal of the Second Amendment following the historic Heller Decision is an “unconscionable attack on the entire Bill of Rights and the freedoms it protects,” the Second Amendment Foundation said today.

In an editorial published on the day after the Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 ruling, the newspaper called the Second Amendment an “anachronism” that should be repealed. The newspaper supported its argument by falsely claiming that a 1939 case, U.S. v Miller, established the amendment as a “collective right” that applied only to service in some type of militia.

“The Chicago Tribune’s editors have demonstrated an appalling short-sightedness,” said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb. “If they are so willing to abandon one civil right for an entire class of American citizens, what’s next? Perhaps they would strip some citizens of their First Amendment rights to free speech or religion. Heaven help us should the Chicago Tribune editorial board one day decide that they don’t care for the editorial slant of their competitors at the Sun-Times, and call for a restriction on that newspaper’s freedom of the press.

“Once you make it acceptable to destroy one civil right,” Gottlieb observed, “it does not take a very big leap to embrace limitations on, or the abolition of, another civil right.

“Not once, in all the years that gun rights organizations have been vilified in the editorial columns of the Tribune and other newspapers did anyone from the firearms community suggest we should repeal the First Amendment,” he stated. “Unlike elitist newspaper editors, gun owners understand that the Bill of Rights is an all-or-nothing document, not a civil rights buffet from which we can pick and choose the rights we want to enjoy and those for which we have no stomach.

“We have always known the Second Amendment affirmed an individual civil right, and a truly objective reading of history by the Chicago Tribune would – if they had any notion of objectivity – lead them to the same conclusion,” Gottlieb concluded. “A generation of parents and grandparents of those now writing such nonsense in the Tribune risked, and all too frequently lost their lives to defend all of the freedoms enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The Tribune editors may as well just spit on their graves.”

-END-




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >
Copyright © 2008 Second Amendment Foundation, All Rights Reserved.

Second Amendment Foundation
James Madison Building
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005 Voice: 425-454-7012
Toll Free: 800-426-4302
FAX: 425-451-3959
email: InformationRequest@saf.or

[Ruger Lady]

The Second Amendment Foundation couldn't have said it better. The article by the Tribune angered me just as much as it did others here but it also scared me. To see how these people think. and what they are willing to do, is scary.That is why we must remember that the fight hasn't ended.

[kwo51]

well look who is paying their pay checks.If we could look at the obama backers you would see they are the same.Socialist

[tattedupboy]

Is anyone all that surprised that a newspaper in Chicago would write an editorial such as this? I would be equally unsurprised if such editorials popped up in other known hoplophobic areas such as PRNYC, PRNJ, PRHI, PRCA, etc.

[kwo51]

And the city of Gaysville florida misspelled gainesville