The only problem is that these lawyers on only stating half of the equation. NOt only do we have the right to keep and bear arms as stated in Heller vs DC. but also we do not have a constitutional right for police protection. as in many cases the supreme court in july of 05 Castle Rock vs GonZales stated that:
"The police have no obligation to protect individuals who, therefore, should defend themselves"
these gun laws are taking away our rights to protect ourselves as the Supreme Court has said time and time again it is our obligation to do so
How bass ackwards is that whole freakin' thing? Are they actually trying to thin out the law abiding herd?