I think there was a "Restaurant Carry" bill introduced in the previous session that did not pass so it was incorporated into a larger bill. You are correct that the original 3292 had no chance at all especially with the "property carry" portion of it tacked on. That portion was thrown out even before the sub-committee started working on the remaining portion of the bill. That did make some people mad and therefore did not give the remainder of the bill as much support and consideration as it deserved. The "all or nothing" attitude of some came out and nothing eventually won.
The restaurant carry deal along with the school property console restriction could possibly been corrected this year but after what happened last year I doubt that you are going to find anyone willing to touch either one. Some consider compromise a four letter word but compromising does not always mean failure, just that it is taking longer to get there. Settling for restaurant carry doesn't mean that we can't ask for more later.




9Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote
