18-year-olds granted gun rights
Results 1 to 4 of 4

18-year-olds granted gun rights

This is a discussion on 18-year-olds granted gun rights within the South Carolina Discussion and Firearm News forums, part of the Firearms Discussion by State category; 18-year-olds granted gun rights Posted on Tue, May. 20, 2008 State Supreme Court rules the age for possession should be ...

  1. #1
    LeavingMass is offline Pro2a
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    265

    Cool 18-year-olds granted gun rights


    18-year-olds granted gun rights

    Posted on Tue, May. 20, 2008
    State Supreme Court rules the age for possession should be lowered
    By RICK BRUNDRETT - rbrundrett@thestate.com

    Youths ages 18 through 20 can possess handguns legally under a state Supreme Court ruling issued Monday.

    The unanimous decision mirrors a new state law that took effect last month.

    The five-member high court said the old law violated the state constitution, which grants full legal rights to everyone who is at least 18 — with the exception of alcohol purchases.

    “By expressly allowing the regulation of the sale of alcoholic beverages to the 18-to-20-year-old age group and not stating any other situation in which the General Assembly may restrict the rights of this age group, the state constitution precludes the General Assembly from prohibiting this age group’s possession of handguns,” Justice James Moore wrote for the court.

    The state Attorney General’s Office, in court papers, supported the old law.

    “Certainly if it is appropriate for the Legislature to stop a 19-year-old from having a Heineken, it is also appropriate under the same power to prohibit that same 19-year-old from having a Glock 9mm semi-automatic pistol,” according to a legal brief submitted for the appeal.

    Attorney General Henry McMaster said Monday the court’s ruling “means that those in jail on that charge will be able to ask to be released.” But he added he believes those cases are “far and few between.”

    McMaster said his office will “need to study the decision” before deciding whether to ask the court to reconsider its ruling.

    State Rep. Mike Pitts, R-Laurens, who authored the new law allowing handgun possession by those who are least 18, said Monday that South Carolina was the only southern state to have the higher age limit.

    “I see it as a self-defense issue,” he said.

    He said if his daughter, when she was 19 or 20, was driving his car, which had a gun in the glove compartment, she could have been charged under the old law even though it would have been legal for him.

    Although the new law lowers the age for legal possession, it doesn’t trump federal law banning those younger than 21 from buying handguns, Pitts said.

    Violation of the old state law was a felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a $2,000 fine. The Attorney General’s office in court papers said there were “valid policy concerns” supporting handgun limitations.

    “Indeed, it is common knowledge that the combination of young people, handguns and gangs creates a particularly toxic mix,” the legal brief said.

    Rock Hill lawyer Leland Greeley, who represented the defendant in Monday’s ruling, said the court’s decision might be used to challenge another state law that bans youths under 21 from obtaining concealed weapons permits.

    The justices in Monday’s ruling upheld a lower court ruling that threw out a York County indictment charging Berry Scott Bolin with possession of a handgun by someone younger than 21.

    Bolin was 19 when he was arrested in connection with the February 2006 shooting death of Bobby Royce Hovis III, 19. Besides the weapons charge, he also was indicted on a charge of murder, though he eventually was convicted of a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to 30 years in prison.

    Reach Brundrett at (803) 771-8484.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Greenville
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Now they (the state supreme court) only needs to say the same thing for drinking age too.

    Most stupid hypocritical law making I've ever seen.

    what you say, young people should not be allowed to drink.

    I agree...but here is the point.... either raize the legal age to 21 for everthing... includeing serving in the armed forces or keep it at 18 and give those same folks ALL thier rights... there should be no middle ground on this!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    South Carolina's Riverfront
    Posts
    39

    Default

    I couldn't agree more Blume357. One of the most rediculous laws around.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Greenville
    Posts
    341

    Default

    Well , keep in mind I'm now and official old geezer and really don't think 18 year olds should be drinking or driving or doing anything much... because I was one once and now realize just how stupid and a danger (to myself and others) I was.... but with that said... the hypocracy should be fixed... I'm not usually a black or white kind of person on things but this is just one of those...

    If our government says a person is old enough to go out and defend us and kill the enemy then I can't see how in the world they can't have every right of a citizen.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •