|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| I've been under the weather or a few days and just checked my email. I called my senators and they are in session now. I'm not sure they are going to bring this up today or not. Please call your senator anyway. It is crunch time for H. 3212, the concealed weapon permit (CWP) recognition/reciprocity bill that has been awaiting Senate action since March 26, 2008, when the House refused to concur with the Senate amendment just as GrassRoots GunRights asked them to refuse to do. The Senate version of H. 3212 is completely unacceptable to gun owners. GrassRoots GunRights provided a detailed analysis of the Senate amendment to H. 3212 to every member of the House in a letter dated March 24, 2008. The GrassRoots analysis - which is repeated below - exposes exactly why the Senate amendment would make South Carolina CWP law worse than existing law. Interestingly, the Senate amendment would change the law so drastically that South Carolina could not even get reciprocity with itself! The Senate version of H. 3212 should be opposed by all pro gun rights supporters! Multiple independent practicing pro gun rights attorneys have read the GrassRoots analysis of the Senate version of H. 3212, and all have agreed the GrassRoots analysis is legally sound (their letters of agreement can be found on the GrassRoots web site). Not a single independent practicing pro gun rights attorney has found fault with the GrassRoots analysis of H. 3212. Call your senator and tell them "GrassRoots GunRights speaks for me on H. 3212!" Use the Senate switchboard (803) 212-6200, or use the individual office numbers listed here. Current GrassRoots Action Alert
__________________ USAF Retired, CATM ie: Red Hat SC CWP, NR NH CWP NRA life member Hard things are put in our way, not to stop us, but to call out our courage and strength. To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787 |
|
#2
| ||||
| | ||||
| Thanks Red Hat for keeping us up to date. Time for a phone call again. |
|
#3
| |||
| | |||
| Time for a Phone call too.............. Thanks agian Red Hat .............
__________________ Glock Carrier in SC. MufDady |
|
#4
| |||
| | |||
| From my understanding the Senate version of H 3212 has passed both the House and Senate and is being sent to the Govenor. I am not sure of the exact procedures and terms. I suspect that SLED will follow through with their promises on this because it is the version they wanted and if they don't in the next session they won't have a leg to stand on trying to fight the full recognition version. I expect the Govenor to sign it but if he doesn't I doubt that they will override his veto. For reference: Quote:
|
|
#5
| |||
| | |||
| Thanks for the heads up.
__________________ To disarm the people (is) the best and most effectual way to enslave them...” George Mason By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith. Hebrews 11:7 |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| The House passed the Senate version of the bill today. However reading the final version it doesn't look ilke they changed anything. Read the 06/06/08 bill here. 2007-2008 Bill 3212 Text of Previous Version (Jun. 5, 2008) - www.scstatehouse.net - LPITS SECTION 1. Section 23-31-215(N) of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 347 of 2006, is further amended to read: "(N) Valid out-of-state permits to carry concealable weapons held by a resident of a reciprocal state must be honored by this State, provided, that the reciprocal state requires an applicant to successfully pass a criminal background check and a course in firearm training and safety. A resident of a reciprocal state carrying a concealable weapon in South Carolina is subject to and must abide by the laws of South Carolina regarding concealable weapons. SLED Line struck out shall make a determination as to those states which have permit issuance standards equal to or greater than the standards contained in this article and end of struck out line shall maintain and publish a list of those states as the states with which South Carolina has reciprocity." I hope this is not their final version and someone put up the wrong one. We'll see in a day or so.
__________________ USAF Retired, CATM ie: Red Hat SC CWP, NR NH CWP NRA life member Hard things are put in our way, not to stop us, but to call out our courage and strength. To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787 |
|
#7
| |||
| | |||
| That is the final version and has been enrolled for ratification. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| The Senate bill didn't have this in it. Quote:
__________________ USAF Retired, CATM ie: Red Hat SC CWP, NR NH CWP NRA life member Hard things are put in our way, not to stop us, but to call out our courage and strength. To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787 Last edited by Red Hat; 06-07-2008 at 03:26 AM. |
|
#9
| |||
| | |||
| Quote:
The problem with the hose bill was that it removed reciprocity completely from the statutes. If a state required a reciprocal agreement SC could not grant it. The House version was great for other states but not for SC residents. |
|
#10
| |||
| | |||
| As I read the above post that means we will recognize Florida's permit.... this is a good thing and one of my most wanted. I've got several friends in Florida who would like to carry in S.C. Now for the big question.... does this mean just resident permits or would a Florida non resident also be accepted? I went back up and re-read it and see it specifically says a resident of the state.... Last edited by blume357@; 06-07-2008 at 08:30 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |