Go Back   USA Carry > Location Specific Forums > Wisconsin Discussion and Firearm News


Wisconsin State Issues 15 Concealed Weapon Permits To Retired Officers

The Wisconsin state Department of Justice has issued 15 concealed weapons permits to retired agents, making them the only former ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1  
Old 12-25-2008, 12:49 PM
lukem's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,744
Default Wisconsin State Issues 15 Concealed Weapon Permits To Retired Officers

The Wisconsin state Department of Justice has issued 15 concealed weapons permits to retired agents, making them the only former state police officers who can pack pistols in public in Wisconsin.

Other state agencies, such as the State Patrol and Capitol Police, don't allow their retirees to carry concealed guns, despite a 2004 federal law allowing the practice in some cases. Around the state, there is a patchwork of retirees who can carry weapons because local police and sheriff's offices issue the permits.

Wisconsin and Illinois are the only two states that don't allow the general public to get licenses to carry concealed weapons. The issue has been fiercely debated here, with Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle twice vetoing such bills.

Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen in June issued the first concealed weapons permit to a Division of Criminal Investigation retiree. He said at the time he would issue them to other qualifying retirees who wanted them and that he hoped his decision would show other state agencies that they could issue the permits too.

But the other state agencies have declined to do so because there are no state standards for issuing the permits.

After issuing one permit to a retired agent in June, the Department of Justice sent letters to all eligible retirees letting them know the permits were available. Of the 50 or so contacted, 14 said they wanted to get them. They shot on the range in September and were given permits that are good for one year. The retirees have to meet the same standards as current agents, said Mike Myszewski, who heads the division.

"I think the program is working very well," Myszewski said. "These are people who spent their adult lives in law enforcement."

State Patrol Superintendent David Collins said he had not seen any increased interest for permits from retired troopers since Van Hollen began issuing the permits. Collins has raised concerns in the past about people's ability to make split-second decisions if they've been out of law enforcement for years.

Under the 2004 federal law, police agencies can permit former officers to carry concealed firearms if they retired in good standing, worked as an officer for 15 years or more, have met state firearms training standards within the past year, and are not otherwise barred from possessing a firearm under federal law.

But some argue such permits can't be issued in Wisconsin because the state does not set training standards for law enforcement agencies. Van Hollen, a Republican, has maintained law enforcement agencies have the power to issue the permits.

"I believe it is important to put our money where our mouth is," he said in a statement. "By having the Department of Justice take the lead when it comes to providing one of our own retired law enforcement officers with a permit to carry a concealed firearm, I believe it shows that we have the confidence in local law enforcement agencies in their ability to do this on their own."

Van Hollen lobbied for a bill that would have set criteria for police agencies for issuing the permits and given them immunity from lawsuits. Neither house took up the bill before the Legislature adjourned in March, however.

John Palmer, 62, retired from the Department of Justice in 2003 after 26 years. Now a part-time private investigator, he said he decided to get a concealed weapons permit but didn't plan to carry a gun often.

"I would only be using it when I felt it would be needed for my own security," he said.

Retiree Greg Eggum, 63, said he decided to get a permit because it gave him a chance to spend some time with his former colleagues on the shooting range. A former state fire marshal, Eggum said he didn't plan to carry a gun personally but that he was glad other retirees would.

"The public is probably going to be safer for it as far as I'm concerned," he said. "I think the attorney general did the public a service by letting his retired officers carry."

Among those declining to issue the permits are the Capitol Police, State Patrol, Department of Natural Resources' Law Enforcement Bureau and University of Wisconsin-Madison Police Department.

By Patrick Marley of the Journal Sentinel

Source: JS Online
__________________




Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 12-25-2008, 06:33 PM
Senior Agent
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jefferson, WI
Posts: 1
Send a message via Yahoo to jrobins
Default About Time

It's about time we get up to date with other States
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2008, 04:18 AM
Steelhorse's Avatar  

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default WI former LEOs can carry......

.....so long as they don't live in Wisconsin.

Many such retired officers have moved from Wisconsin, allowing them to qualify in the state of their actual residence, provided they meet the rest of the criteria in LEOSA.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2008, 10:53 AM
tattedupboy's Avatar
Thank God I'm alive!
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,994
Send a message via AIM to tattedupboy Send a message via Yahoo to tattedupboy
Default

How disgraceful! According to their reasoning, the lives of retired police officers are more important than the lives of everyone else.
__________________
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2008, 07:08 PM
Steelhorse's Avatar  

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 30
Default Disgraceful? Possibly, but not entirely true.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
How disgraceful! According to their reasoning, the lives of retired police officers are more important than the lives of everyone else.
The legislative intent of the law was to provide active and retired law enforcement the means to defend themselves against the multiple criminal elements that may be familiar with said individuals because of their profession.

Of course, if the law truly was meant to mean such, persons such as judges, prosecutors, and the like, would have been included in the federal LEOSA act.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2008, 08:57 PM
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany, NY area
Posts: 10
Default The Soviet Socialist Republic of Wisconsin

OMG: How can the citizens of Wisconsin tolerate this violation of their 2nd amendment right? Why isn't there a full court legal press to bring this travesty to the courts? Set up a fund, I will contribute.

I am New York concealed carry permit holder, a Certified NRA Pistol Instructor and Training Counselor, I have more experience, shoot more and probably better, am safer and more mentally prepared than 95% of the law enforcement elite of the State of Wisconsin but if I moved to Kenosha, the birthplace of my father, I would be disarmed by the "rulers" of the land.

What an insult to both the retired law enforcement officers of Wisconsin and every responsible citizen of the state.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2009, 11:07 PM
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany, NY area
Posts: 10
Default Baaaaa

On December 27, 2008 I posted a challange to the citizens of the Soviet Socialist Rebuplic of Wisconsin to stand up for their rights and offered to contribute to their efforts.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2009, 04:06 AM
spf159753's Avatar  

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tacoma,WA.
Posts: 71
Default

It just goes to show,that law enforcement and the Gov. do NOT care about their law abiding citizens.
Especially in the Mid-West;ie;Shitcago(Illinois),and PissConsin!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2009, 11:36 PM
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Williamstown
Posts: 70
Default

Wisconsin needs to get rid of Jim Doyle and get someone in the Giovernor's office that has something that resembles a brain!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2009, 06:18 PM
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1
Default

Jim is not running again, thank God! Tom Barrett seems to be the current leading contender (I like Walker myself) and even after getting beaten to a pulp with a pipe, the man is still against concealed carry. What is going on in this state that the people in charge are that much against self preservation?!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
concealed, issues, officers, permits, retired, state, weapon, wisconsin

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.usacarry.com/forums/wisconsin-discussion-firearm-news/5704-wisconsin-state-issues-15-concealed-weapon-permits-retired-officers.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Concealed Carry Permit Wisconsin Links This thread Refback 02-05-2009 12:08 PM 1




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

OpticsPlanet - DKNY Sunglasses, Golf Rangefinders, Yukon Binoculars, Energizer Batteries, Meopta Binoculars, Ray Ban Sunglasses, Glock Holsters, Bushnell Binoculars, motorcycle gloves, Blackhawk Gloves, Barska Binoculars, Under Armour Socks, Under Armour Gloves, ATN Night Vision, and Flir Thermal Imaging.





For more information of NFA Gun Trusts or to learn if your state permits ownership of Silencers, SBR's, or Machine guns without your CLEO's signature visit the Gun Trust Lawyer website.


More About Front Sight Firearms Training Institute and Ignatius Piazza
join NRA United States Concealed Carry Association