How do you feel/react to "No Guns" signs? - Page 2

View Poll Results: See thread title.

Voters
100. You may not vote on this poll
  • I ignore the sign. Conceaed means concealed.

    29 29.00%
  • I disarm and then enter.

    6 6.00%
  • I refuse to enter. Armed or not.

    49 49.00%
  • Breaking the owners rules violates their rights.

    9 9.00%
  • Breaking the owners rules does not violate their rights, only their rules.

    12 12.00%
  • Every rule should be followed all of the time. No exceptions.

    2 2.00%
  • It is okay to break some rules.

    6 6.00%
  • A business owner has the right to make rules that violate a persons rights.

    3 3.00%
  • A business owner does not have the right to make a rule that takes away my rights.

    18 18.00%
  • All your base are belong to us.

    10 10.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: How do you feel/react to "No Guns" signs?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    68
    Quote Originally Posted by PaxMentis View Post
    .....However...in all honesty, I should say that I really don't look very hard (if at all) when I am entering a restaurant or retail store...partly because the signs have no legal weight here and I sort of figure it is up to the owner to post in such a way that I can't miss it if he/she is serious about it.

    If my armed status is noticed and an objection is made, I am happy to leave...whether there is a sign or not.
    Sign? What sign? Oh, that sign. That only applies to knives and snub nosed revolvers. Mine is a semi-auto.
    That is the same law here. You can be asked to leave or disarm if they find out about the gun. If you refuse you can be arrested for trespassing. I just avoid those businesses altogether.

    Much as I hate to say it, that is their right as a private property owner to post those stupid signs. However, I have a right to spend my money someplace else. My view on posting public buildings is something totally different.
    "When you have to shoot...shoot, don't talk."---Tuco Benedicto Pacífico Juan María Ramírez (aka "The Rat")From The Good the Bad and the Ugly.

  2.   
  3. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by NavyLT View Post
    Holy crap, what an outrageous article! Stupid Portland.

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SE FL and SE OH
    Posts
    5,677
    Quote Originally Posted by NavyLT View Post
    Do they have a NO Cops Allowed sign in the window? Looks like the onwers want CFZ, otherwise known a Criminal Freerange Zone.

  5. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackieChan View Post
    I go in shooting. It's the only safe way.
    I needed the laugh thanks

  6. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by NavyLT View Post
    Looked to me like the java joint (co-)owner was more anti-cop than anti-gun although he's likely both. When there's this much antagonism between the police community and the business community, and the police spokesperson openly acknowledges it, sounds like it's time for some attitude changes, starting with the police commissioner who sets the tone for the force. Of course, I may be making an erroneous assumption that the cops are largely to blame for the problems.


    3X PM

  7. #16
    The second amendment is still treated as not there in this country.I don't feel that the SCOTUS did us any favor in their Chicago ruling, as the second amendment spells out our right and only that ,it does not say ' here , but not there ' or ' concealed - not concealed ' or that I have to pay a fee , tax or buy a ccw permit or take special classes.Nor does it say everyone must agree its o k to bear arms , in order to bear arms in the USA .
    However......It does say that ' the right to bear arms shall not be infringed ' .And yet in this ( free my ass ) free country that touts so much about its freedom and its great constitution ' the right to bear arms shall not be infringed ' has been infringed ever since it was written in some way or another and SCOTUS & the constitution ignored for over 200 years . Constitutional Rights =
    So who is right ? The ccw or the store owner ?

    Your decision could effect your privilege to carry in this land of the Notso Free .
    Washington didn't use his right of free speech to defeat the British , he shot them.

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Rocky River, Ohio
    Posts
    1,523
    I don't absolutely avoid non-statutory CPZs in Ohio, but I am MUCH less likely to patronize a business which removes my ability to defend my own life while assuming ZERO responsibility themselves.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    OHIO
    Posts
    2,109
    Quote Originally Posted by MECHTESTER View Post
    Much as I hate to say it, that is their right as a private property owner to post those stupid signs.
    Here we go again........At least you didnt say they had the "right" to keep guns off the property (that they have INVITED the public onto), only to post a stupid sign...

    BTW.. I agree with the rest of your post.

  10. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Seeya View Post
    I needed the laugh thanks
    Obliged!

  11. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Western Iowa
    Posts
    60

    Not so sure myself...

    I did vote but I haven't been carrying long enough to really know what I do. I have purchased a small hard-sided pistol box with a padlock so I CAN lock up my gun in the car to go inside someplace with one of "those" signs.

    In my state those signs do carry the force of law and I have to admit I'm rather annoyed by having to constantly look for them to know where I can and can't go while carrying. I live on the border of a state that has a lot of places specified where I can not carry so I need to be prepared there regardless.

    I am of the general inclination to respect the owner's wishes but I would likely stop doing business somewhere due to that. I can't say I wouldn't go in at least a few times possibly to inform the business of my "boycott." There may be an instance where I would disregard "those" signs due to safety concerns as stated above but I don't see that happening too frequently either.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast