Knockout game deadly for two thugs - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Knockout game deadly for two thugs

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Western South Dakota
    Posts
    1,021
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul_of_TX View Post
    I don't feel any sympathy for these teens. I'm sure everyone of them in that group needed a dose of vitamin Pb. Whether or not this story is fake it is worth pointing out that what she supposedly did should be avoided. The article claims she fired into the crowd of teens. That just sounds like a nightmare waiting to happen.
    Vitaman Pb - I LIKE that!

    We need a TV ad for that - something like, "Are you plagued by virulent thuggery? All it takes is megadose of Vitamin Pb to clear it up."




    All right, I'm not really proposing a mass shooting in the 'hood. But some days it seems drastic measures are needed.
    Never argue with a red-haired witch. It wastes your breath and only delays the inevitable. --the collected sayings of Wiz Zumwalt

  2.   
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,096
    The young thug in lansing michigan got two for trying to taser his victim. One in the leg and one about an inch from his spine. Seems to me that this will start receiving lamestream media attention now and that will fan the flames of hate and discontent. I for one will not be leaving the homestead unprepared to deal with eithor a medical or personal emergency....I will be glad when florida house bill 89 gets passed....

  4. #13
    ezkl2230 Guest
    The story may not actually have happened, but the responses of some of the readers are downright mind boggling!

    One guy said, "No one deserves to die, not even a dumb douchebag teenager."

    Another guy actually agreed: "
    I totally back up his point; is it responsible to return violence with violence, and then use religion to cover up a murder? two crimes were committed here: an assault by one individual (could have been more, thankfully not) and the other murder. I understand that self defence is important, however taking the lives of two young individuals in the process doesn't balance out. An eye for an eye you say? no, she took two lives, and could have taken more. It's called murder. It's murder because in order for 'self-defence' to be utilized as a defence, she must have used the equal amount of force, or less to protect herself. the moment she pulled the gun on the kids is manslaughter--and I do hope she serves time for this"

    I couldn't let that one pass by: "
    The fact that there were 7 against one senior citizen means that the force required to adequately meet the threat was automatically escalated. For you to think that she could in any way meet these predators with force on force is absurd in the extreme. It is called self defense, and while the result may be classified as homicide, it is also rightly classified as JUSTIFIABLE homicide. For her to be guilty of murder means that A) what she did was unlawful and B) it was pre-meditated. She was lawfully carrying a firearm under color of law that gives her the right to use deadly force to defend herself against the imminent threat of rape, great bodily harm, or death, so that strikes down the first part of that definition, and it was the attack on her that was pre-meditated - not her response, so that strikes down the second part of that definition. She murdered no one, but they certainly would have murdered her without a second thought."

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast