Another Case Of C & C Gone Wrong? - Page 6
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 90

Thread: Another Case Of C & C Gone Wrong?

  1. #51
    Think about it...anything you say or do (like punching the guy) escalates the situation. That's exactly my point. So...say you're carrying, I insult your wife, you punch me. If you don't put me out of commission right away, it's on. Now we're grappling around. How long before your weapon comes out, either accidently or not? NOW, the sh#t is in the fan.

    BTW, before someone misinterprets this, I have never and would never insult your wife or girfriend; not my style: I'm a friendly guy and I like my teeth where they are, thank you. But there are idiots out there...

  2.   
  3. #52
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Carolina/Charleston
    Posts
    2,388
    Hey titaniuman: If the aggressive schmoe is such a moron that it is necessary for him to insult your wife for no apparent reason, why do you think he will not escalate his aggressive stupidiy after you punch him? When he does that and now pulls out a knife or goes to his car and comes back with a bat, or comes at you with murderous intent with fists raging, you now have precipitated an encounter that has changed from a few words to a potential CCW use. If there are witnesses to this entire incident, their comments may very well spell real trouble for you. Bottom line and I have heard this from many: If you have a CCW you DO NOT DO ANYTHING aggressive or in retaliation to stupidity or mean words or cutting off a car or a middle finger flip. If the schmoe is still active and will not accept your "not doing anything", you begin to think about witnesses in the area and you begin to talk to the schmoe loud enough for anyone to hear that you do not want any trouble and want bygones to be bygones and leave me alone. If the schmoe continues and now shows a bat, or a knife. or a bigger set of fists and muscle than you and this really puts "fear of serious injury (or thoughts of death) into your equation--at least in SC (a no retreat state) you can demonstrate to the schmoe what a life changing event is all about. It can always come down to convincing 12 people on a jury and you better have a real solid case for CCW use.

  4. #53
    In Tennessee answer is simple. You brought the gun. You took part in the fight and antagonized your opponent. You shot him with said gun. Even if you feared for your life you still brought the gun to the fight and stayed. Fear for your life will get you down to manslaughter but not self defense. You may or may not get hard time, but you can kiss your HCP and voting rights goodbye. The prosecutor will argue that you made extraction from the fight impossible by your actions.

    If you are carrying, keep your mouth shut, swallow your pride and walk away. If this runs against your grain, then don't carry. You may have a Constitutional right to bear arms, but you don't have a Constitutional right to shoot people you don't like. In the heat of a personal argument the distinction between the two can get blurred.

  5. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Carolina/Charleston
    Posts
    2,388
    Hey wjh2657: Your comments were right on and, in my opinion, regardless of the state you live in. If I am on a jury and there is evidence that the CCW holder essentially increased the likelihood of aggressive actions that ended with the presentation and use of the CCW, I will require extraordinary evidence to prove to me that the CCW holder should not be penalized in some form or found guilty of some crime. Conversely, if you have done everything you can do to avoid increased aggression and have witnesses who heard you yelling in that vein, I will congratulate you for not being a sheep in front of a wolf.

  6. #55
    It's not always about you though.

    Take the situation I was in about 30 years ago.

    Wafflehouse restaurant, 11:00 at night, two truly stereotypical rednecks making escalating comments about a young black man eating in the restaurant at the time. Do you stay across the room and turn your head to look out the window because you have a firearm on your belt? Do you get up and leave, hoping to get to a phone and call police before there's an explosion of violence? Of course if they fight, your intercession might be appropriately justified as preventing a felony assault of possible manslaughter. Without the first punch being throw though do you dare say a word to attempt to diffuse them?

    I'm asking the question, "If your ethics and morals would have required you to involve yourself if there was no gun, can you 'just walk away' only because you chose to carry a weapon this evening?"

    I don't think this is an easy question to answer but maybe someone has some well-thought-out response which fits this situation and still would allow you to sleep at night if something did, in fact, explode.
    Reality, DEAL with IT!

  7. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658
    My high school wood shop teacher was a good life teacher as well. He said something to the effect of "If you bring the desire to have a conflict with you when you go out, conflict will find you and at some point in time you will find yourself in conflict with someone who can defend themselves better than you”. “If you’re lucky it will hurt just your pride”. “If not so lucky you could die.” He was a trained and certified black belt (Karate & Kempo if I can recall) and a self defense instructor part time. I keep that in mind and tell others when they have a case of more attitude than brains syndrome. Violence will beget violence…
    From the initial article read it seemed to me that it was a case of mistakes in judgment on both sides. Leaving the scene and not calling for LEOs on the part of the shooter makes the "I feel guilty" thing hard for me to dismiss.
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  8. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658
    Quote Originally Posted by ecocks View Post
    It's not always about you though.

    Take the situation I was in about 30 years ago.

    Wafflehouse restaurant, 11:00 at night, two truly stereotypical rednecks making escalating comments about a young black man eating in the restaurant at the time. Do you stay across the room and turn your head to look out the window because you have a firearm on your belt? Do you get up and leave, hoping to get to a phone and call police before there's an explosion of violence? Of course if they fight, your intercession might be appropriately justified as preventing a felony assault of possible manslaughter. Without the first punch being throw though do you dare say a word to attempt to diffuse them?

    I'm asking the question, "If your ethics and morals would have required you to involve yourself if there was no gun, can you 'just walk away' only because you chose to carry a weapon this evening?"

    I don't think this is an easy question to answer but maybe someone has some well-thought-out response which fits this situation and still would allow you to sleep at night if something did, in fact, explode.
    This is by far the toughest question of them all. Here’s my take, and since this is open forum, by all means have a ball with this one.
    Once you involve yourself in the situation it becomes about you. Perhaps you have strong feelings about “blind hatred”. Blind seething hatred, that’s been taught since birth by those who were taught the same. Because of the color of skin, the slant of eyes, the cloth on his head, the Star of David that hangs around his neck. Not like me so I hate him!!!… I could go on and on…
    Here is the situation in which you become the witness while the taunting and teasing ensue, as painful as it may be to hear. Keep good mental note of the events. Make mention to the owner of the establishment that there may be a fight here if nothing is done to stop what you have been witnessing. Act if and when the action begins by first deciding if you need to intervene and try to keep peace if possible. Maybe the guy is one of those “better at self defense than would be anticipated” types? When asked by the LEO who responds if you wish to make a statement say yes and relay the events with no emotion and as accurately as possible. If need be, due to the severity of the event if it gets to that point, when asked to appear in court as a witness DO… And perhaps Justice will be had by all…
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  9. #58
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Carolina/Charleston
    Posts
    2,388
    Hey ecocks: The "what ifs" in this forum are really very good exercises for all of us and I anxiously await the varied "what ifs" that my fellow forum users can come up with and the replies that result. In SC we have the alter ego rule as part of our CCW laws, which basically states that if someone is being attacked and you believe that they are in imminent danger of serious injury or death, you can intercede with deadly force as if it were you being attacked. With that being said, it would be my view (opinion) that unless this other individual, whoever he is, is being physically assaulted and is being pummeled senseless or is facing a weapon, SC law will not allow you to use your CCW to defend him. Words and verbal assaults do not count--"sticks and stones (and fists and guns and knives) may break my bones but words will never harm me". You may feel a moral obligation to the black dude to intercede but you have to walk away if you are CCW--this situation has a way of biting you since no physical assault has occurred; escalation may occur AFTER you stick your CCW into the equation and it is your fault at that time. You've got to call the police and stay out of the situation.

  10. #59
    I'm trying to think of another approach besides walking away (that just grates on me) and directly interceding and escalating the situation. Ok, suppose you approach the black dude and say something friendly like: "hey, why don't you come sit with me and eat?". You haven't said anything to the jackasses who were harassing him. Now, they turn on you but you refuse to bite, attempt to calmly de-escalate the situation, etc. etc. At this point, if they escalate to physical violence, are you justified in using appropriate measures? Or simply by sticking your nose into the situation, are you going to be faulted?

  11. #60
    Hey guys, Even though this is a serious topic, I am regarding this as a casual beer and pizza conversation, not a Supreme Court argument.

    It is a tough question and I truly don't know the answer. That's especially true since each individual has their own sense of ethics and morality to apply to the situation.
    Reality, DEAL with IT!

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast