Mehserle letter: ex BART cop sorry...
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Mehserle letter: ex BART cop sorry...

  1. #1

    Mehserle letter: ex BART cop sorry...

    Mehserle letter: Ex-BART cop says he's sorry, describes the moments after shooting Oscar Grant - Inside Bay Area
    Johannes Mehserle, in a letter to the public released today, says he is sorry for the shooting that took Oscar Grant's life, wishes he could speak to Grant's family members and describes the moments after the shooting on the Fruitvale BART station platform on Jan.1, 2009.
    Click on the link to read the letter.
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North Idaho
    Posts
    265
    Sadm sad situation for all invovled. Don't know if you have watched the video or not, but it was apparent that he meant to tase the guy and not shoot him.... huge screw up with life changing implications for all familiaes involved.... no good outcome on this one

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    993
    I've seen the video from more than one vantage point, and even if he meant to tase the guy, I'd award the guy hundreds of thousands in his police brutality lawsuit. There was no justification for tasing him either.

    And you cannot convince me that when they are trained on safe employment of the taser vs. safe employment of the sidearm, that when he made the indefensible decision to go for his taser that he A) mistakenly want to the wrong side of his rig, B) mistook the metallic heft of his sidearm for the light weight of his plastic taser, and C) mistook the sight profile down his sidearm for the taser's sight profile. That's three incompetencies and that assumes he would have been justified in tasing a man 1) in the back, 2) who was on the ground, 3) with his hands cuffed behind his back. And that is all without the corroborated claims of obvious bias directed from the police at the man, bias which is only exacerbated by the claims of a cry of "he's got a gun!", since such a claim stemmed directly from their biases, not from the facts of the night.

    It all comes down to I) they were biased, II) they chose to pick on this man who had nothing to do with the reason they were called, and III) they decided he had to die. That's 2nd degree murger at minimum, not involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter means they bought the arguments that the suspect needed to be tased and that going to the sidearm was a legitimate, if unfortunate, mistake.
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North Idaho
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by CathyInBlue View Post
    I've seen the video from more than one vantage point, and even if he meant to tase the guy, I'd award the guy hundreds of thousands in his police brutality lawsuit. There was no justification for tasing him either.

    And you cannot convince me that when they are trained on safe employment of the taser vs. safe employment of the sidearm, that when he made the indefensible decision to go for his taser that he A) mistakenly want to the wrong side of his rig, B) mistook the metallic heft of his sidearm for the light weight of his plastic taser, and C) mistook the sight profile down his sidearm for the taser's sight profile. That's three incompetencies and that assumes he would have been justified in tasing a man 1) in the back, 2) who was on the ground, 3) with his hands cuffed behind his back. And that is all without the corroborated claims of obvious bias directed from the police at the man, bias which is only exacerbated by the claims of a cry of "he's got a gun!", since such a claim stemmed directly from their biases, not from the facts of the night.

    It all comes down to I) they were biased, II) they chose to pick on this man who had nothing to do with the reason they were called, and III) they decided he had to die. That's 2nd degree murger at minimum, not involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter means they bought the arguments that the suspect needed to be tased and that going to the sidearm was a legitimate, if unfortunate, mistake.


    Cathy, I will respect your opinion in this case. However, it's easy to Monday morning quarterback these things. I am assuming you have never been on the side of the law enforcement officers, or you might look at this in a slightly different light. Having been there, I would have to disagree here.

    Having said that, I don't disagree that criminal charges and a civil award are unjustified in this case. ave you read the California penal codes on this? Manslaughter was the right verdict in this case, IMHO.

    As stated earlier, its a sad situation with a bad ending for all invovled.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    993
    Manslaughter is the chickenshit compromise verdict in this case. And yes, I have seen cases where I felt the police were in the right and the general consensus against the police was in the wrong.
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

  7. #6
    he shot a defenseless man in the back. Anyway you look at it that act was the willful disregard for life.
    The Second Amendment is about the right to be able to protect oneself from all who would do us harm including Legislators! I came into this world screaming and covered in someone Else's blood, don't care if I go out the same way

Similar Threads

  1. An Open Letter to Obama
    By HK4U in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2010, 10:19 AM
  2. State Attorneys General Letter, June 11, 2009, to U. S. AG
    By varminter22 in forum Nevada Discussion and Firearm News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-14-2009, 10:00 PM
  3. Effectively Communicating With Your Lawmakers
    By Tea For One in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2009, 11:37 AM
  4. Bay Area Rapid Transit Police Shooting
    By ricbak in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-14-2009, 02:50 PM
  5. Cop harrasing another cop.
    By S&WM&P40 in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-17-2008, 04:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast