You Knew This Was Coming
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: You Knew This Was Coming

  1. #1

    You Knew This Was Coming

    And of course it's not the first time some sleeze ball lawyer has sued the good guy. A store clerk got the jump on a gun-wielding robber and shot him first. Now the bad guy's widow is suing the store clerk for shooting the idiot.

    Armed Robber Shot By Store Clerk Is Being Sued By Robbers Wife // Mr. Conservative

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    2,072
    This is an example of what I was talking about in another thread in reference to how screwed up the legal system is in this country.


    I used to be a government-educated stooge. By the grace of God, I repent. -Robert Burris

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Real World
    Posts
    7,818
    Arizona prohibits such law suits.
    ~ GOD HATES RELIGION ~

  5. #4

    You Knew This Was Coming

    Everyone gun owner in that city needs to go slip on that lawyers front lawn, injure themselves, and sue the living crap out of him. And then punch him in the face.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    South Carolina/Charleston
    Posts
    2,388
    Try it in SC and find out what happens to the lawyer and the miscreant's wife. Good shooting equals civil lawsuit immunity. Hopefully, the person being sued in this thread will turn around and sue the lady AND the lawyer for harassment and unprofessional conduct if the shoot was a good one.

  7. #6
    this would never happen in FLA, as long as it is a justifiable shooting the law protects the shooter from civil suits like this.

  8. #7
    Unfortunately, not every state grants civil immunity when using deadly force in self-defense. Ohio is one such state. No civil immunity here. The good part is civil suits can be tried by jury. I doubt a judge will throw out this case, so get some of this store clerk's peers in the jury box and let them decide whether he owes this criminal's wife any money.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by apvbguy View Post
    this would never happen in FLA, as long as it is a justifiable shooting the law protects the shooter from civil suits like this.
    Unless one shoots a 17yr old thug and all the looney liberals plus media get involved
    Just sayin
    If it doesn't fit, FORCE it! If it breaks then it needed to be replaced anyway.


  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Diealotz View Post
    Unless one shoots a 17yr old thug and all the looney liberals plus media get involved
    Just sayin
    They haven't determined whether Zimmerman's use of deadly force was justified. If they determine it was, civil suit can't be brought against him.

  11. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Diealotz View Post
    Unless one shoots a 17yr old thug and all the looney liberals plus media get involved
    Just sayin
    you are confusing criminal and civil liabilities, one reason the libtards are trying to force criminal convictions is so that they can start the gravy train of civil lawsuits upon a criminal conviction. No conviction means no easy moola

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast