Family: New Jersey man serving 7 years for guns he owned legally
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Family: New Jersey man serving 7 years for guns he owned legally

  1. Family: New Jersey man serving 7 years for guns he owned legally

    Posted on Tue, Nov. 30, 2010

    Family: New Jersey man serving 7 years for guns he owned legally

    By JASON NARK
    Philadelphia Daily News

    [email protected] 856-779-3231

    EVERYTHING Brian Aitken was or had worked for was wiped away one winter afternoon after his mother called the police on him.

    Separated from his wife, the entrepreneur and media consultant, now 27, had moved back home to New Jersey from Colorado toward the end of 2008 to be closer to their young son.

    In between jobs, his well-oiled life was running ragged, and on Jan. 2, 2009, when his ex canceled his visit with their son, he became distraught, muttered something to his mother, and left his parents' home in Mount Laurel, N.J.

    "He said something that scared her, things that a guy will only say to his mom, like . . . 'Life's not worth living anymore,' " said Larry Aitken, Brian's father.

    Sue Aitken, a trained social worker, decided to play it safe and called police, but she hung up before the 9-1-1 dispatcher could answer. Police traced the call and showed up anyway, and found two handguns in the trunk of Brian's car. And now Brian, her middle child, a graduate student with no prior criminal record, is serving a seven-year prison sentence for weapons charges.

    No one blames Sue Aitken for Brian's arrest, except herself maybe, but his father and attorney claim that the Burlington County Prosecutor's Office and the former Superior Court judge who tried the case ignored evidence that proved Brian had the guns legally. The family has asked New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for clemency and has garnered a great deal of support on a "Free Brian Aitken" Facebook page and among gun-rights advocates.

    Aitken and his supporters believe that he had a legal exemption to have the handguns in his car because he was moving from his parents' home to a residence in Hoboken.

    "This case is the perfect storm of injustice," said Aitken's attorney, Evan Nappen, of Eatontown, Monmouth County, who specializes in gun laws.

    The Burlington County Prosecutor's Office and former Superior Court Judge James Morley said Aitken and his legal team tried during closing arguments to raise an issue related to Aitken's moving that wasn't presented during the trial, but Morley wouldn't consider it. Aitken remains in prison pending his appeal.

    A few weeks after Aitken's trial over the summer, Morley learned that Christie was not going to reappoint him, due in part to a 2009 case in which he dismissed animal-cruelty charges against a Moorestown cop accused of sticking his ***** into the mouths of five calves. Morley said there was no way of knowing whether the calves had been "puzzled" or "tormented" by the officer's actions.

    Nappen thinks the animal-cruelty case exemplifies poor decision-making by Morley.

    "Brian didn't receive oral sex from calves; he only lawfully possessed firearms," Nappen said.

    A spokesman for Christie acknowledged that his office had received clemency requests for Aitken, but declined to comment further.
    Handguns in a duffel bag

    When Mount Laurel police arrived at the Aitkens' home on Jan. 2, 2009, they called Brian - who was driving to Hoboken - and asked him to return to his parents' home because they were worried. When he arrived, the cops checked his Honda Civic and, inside the trunk, in a box stuffed into a duffel bag with clothes, they found two handguns, both locked and unloaded as New Jersey law requires.

    Aitken had passed an FBI background check to buy them in Colorado when he lived there, his father said, and had contacted New Jersey State Police and discussed the proper way to transport them.

    "He bought them at Bass Pro Shops, for God's sake, not some guy named Tony on the street corner," his father said.

    New Jersey and Colorado are on opposite ends of the gun-control spectrum. In Colorado, all he needed was the background check to own the guns.

    In the Garden State, Aitken was required to have a purchaser's permit from New Jersey to own the guns and a carry permit to have them in his car.

    He also was charged with having "large capacity" magazines and hollow-point bullets, which one state gun-control advocate found troubling.

    "What little I can glean about the transportation issue leaves me puzzled, but a person with common sense would not be moving illegal products from one place to another by car," said Bryan Miller, executive director of CeaseFire NJ, an organization devoted to reducing gun violence.

    "If Mr. Aitken did the research he said he did, he would not have hollow-point bullets and large-capacity magazines in the vehicle," Miller said. "They are illegal, period."

    New Jersey allows exemptions for gun owners to transport weapons for hunting or if they are moving from one residence to another. During the trial, Aitken's mother testified that her son was moving things out, and his friend in Hoboken testified he was moving things in. A Mount Laurel officer, according to Larry Aitken, testified that he saw boxes of dishes and clothes in the Honda Civic on the day of the arrest.

    The exemption statute, according to the prosecutor's office, specifies that legal guns can be transported "while moving." Despite testimony about his moving to Hoboken, a spokesman for the prosecutor said the evidence suggested that Aitken had moved months earlier, from Colorado to Mount Laurel. "Again, there was no evidence that he was then presently moving," spokesman Joel Bewley said.

    After Nappen raised the moving-exemption issue, he said, the jury asked Judge Morley for the exemption statute several times and he refused to hand it over to them. Morley, in a phone interview, echoed the sentiments of the prosecutor's office.

    "My recollection of the case is that I ruled he had not presented evidence sufficient to justify giving the jury the charge on the affirmative offense that he was in the process of moving," Morley said.

    Morley declined to comment further.

    Aitken, who did not testify, was convicted and in August sentenced to prison. His father said that his son was involved in an "incident" after arriving in prison but that he doesn't discuss it.

    "This is the most normal, everyday, All-American regular kid, and for this to happen to him is a disgrace," Larry Aitken said. "It's a disgrace of society."

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SE FL and SE OH
    Posts
    5,668
    As someone who has sat on juries, just the fact the judge refused to allow the statute to be seen means that he would have walked if I'd been on that jury. It's like if the state won't introduce whether there is a restraining order in a case. That is one thing that was discussed with the jury and all the others involved in one case I sat on. The judge understood why we voted the way we did and so did the defendant.

  4. #3
    What is not discussed in this case, or by Constitutional 'experts' or NRA or anyone else for that matter is that Brian's Constitutional rights under Art. lV Sec.1 'Full Faith and Credit' were trampled, it is because of this section that we do not need fifty drivers licenses to travel around the U.S. It reads Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.
    Simply put , we are also issued a gun permit in our resident state just as we are a drivers license, it must be recognized as a legal document under this act and must be recognized by every other state. Our citizenship does not end at our state line, we also pay FEDERAL taxes that should point to the free use of OUR country and all rights therein for its citizens through the Constitution.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658
    I just added this same story and a commentary written about it to the thread "Unabridged 2nd Amendment"...

    This is what compromise and the liberal interpretation of the Bill of Rights has gotten the people of the United States...
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  6. #5
    Just another reason to avoid New Jersey like the plague it is. Why assumeably educated reasonably intellegent people voice ignorant opinions and wonder why everyone doesn't agree is beyond my understanding. I believe wholeheartedly, as cliche as it has become, we can not trust a government who does not trust its people with a gun, local or federal.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658
    Quote Originally Posted by mshean View Post
    What is not discussed in this case, or by Constitutional 'experts' or NRA or anyone else for that matter is that Brian's Constitutional rights under Art. lV Sec.1 'Full Faith and Credit' were trampled, it is because of this section that we do not need fifty drivers licenses to travel around the U.S. It reads Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.
    Simply put , we are also issued a gun permit in our resident state just as we are a drivers license, it must be recognized as a legal document under this act. Our citizenship does not end at our state line, we also pay FEDERAL taxes that should point to the free use of OUR country and all rights therein for its citizens through the Constitution.
    +1 Amen...
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  8. #7
    Thanks Mom.....

    Really say no to Jersey!!!!

  9. #8

    Boycott

    As Americans we have the means to send a powerful message to New Jersey or any other state that is 'constitutionally disfunctional'. Contact that states Chamber of Commerce and in no uncertain terms explain why you will not spend even one penny of your money in their state, boycott the states that have decided to boycott our gun rights. Then contact their statehouse and leave that message for the exaulted governor also!

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by mshean View Post
    As Americans we have the means to send a powerful message to New Jersey or any other state that is 'constitutionally disfunctional'. Contact that states Chamber of Commerce and in no uncertain terms explain why you will not spend even one penny of your money in their state, boycott the states that have decided to boycott our gun rights. Then contact their statehouse and leave that message for the exaulted governor also!
    FWIW, when I travel to Connecticut from South Carolina, I do not stop in New Jersey, EVER! I make sure I have a full tank of gas when I leave Delaware, have my required compliment of chips and soda, and will not need to make any pit stops. New Jersey does not exsist to me except as a highway between Philly/Delaware and New York.

  11. #10

    Bingo!!!

    Good job! Now follow up with a call to their Chamber of Commerce and State House. EVERYONE should!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. New Jersey Man Serving 7 Years for Guns He Owned Legally
    By Bohemian in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-23-2010, 08:13 AM
  2. The old man! Semper fi !!!
    By ralphtwo in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-02-2010, 07:59 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-07-2008, 01:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast