AK-47 vs. M16(AK vs. AR), which do you choose? Why?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: AK-47 vs. M16(AK vs. AR), which do you choose? Why?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    An Alternate Reality, I Assure You...
    Posts
    5,115

    AK-47 vs. M16(AK vs. AR), which do you choose? Why?

    Just to get some opinions going, which platform do you prefer? This includes the most modern modifications to both weapons. It includes the 5.45mm AK and the 6.8mm M16s, as well as the AKS-74U and M4 carbines... all of 'em. The one exception is the new "gas piston" M16s... being that the difference in the gas systems is the largest argument betwwen these two.

    Include reasons such as ergonomics, sights, magizines, grips, reliability, weapon toughness, accuracy, price(bang for buck), whatever you think is a deciding factor.

    I, like the AK platform. I prefer the the gas piston system over the direct impingement b/c it keeps the reciever group cleaner and cooler, which helps prevent malfunctions under extreme use. I prefer the ergos of the AK over the M16. I prefer the toughness of the AK, I know the M16 is tough but not as tough... I've had many experiances with the M16, not as forgiving as the AK. And, I love the price of the AK over the M16.

    Now, some may argue that the magizine system of the AK sucks compared to the M16... you can't just shove it in. With practice, a reload with an AK is just as fast as an M16. Some will argue it's not as easy to charge the weapon after reloading(with no bolt release)... again, with practice charging an AK can be very fast and part of one fluid movement of the reload. And, the sights on the AK don't provide a long sight picture(campared to the 20" A2)... this ofcourse becomes null once compared with the M4.

    None of the so called "faults" of the AK platform justify the purchase of an M16 as my go-to rifle. But, the "faults" of the M16 does justify the purchase of the AK.

    IMO.
    Quote Originally Posted by Deanimator View Post
    [*]Don't be afraid to use sarcasm, mockery and humiliation. They don't respect you. There's no need to pretend you respect them.
    Operation Veterans Relief: http://www.opvr.org/home.html

  2.   
  3. In my opinion, it's a matter of whether you're interested in reliability under abuse or precision with adequate reliability. I have both and both are functional but I really prefer the accuracy and adaptability of the AR over the AK. With the tools I have, the AR can be built, rebuilt, adapted, or customized to meet most any situation(including multicaliber capability=5.45x39,223/5.56x45,7.62x39).

  4. Love my Saiga .223
    It was a matter of cost mostly for me.

  5. #4
    The AR is a rifleman's rifle.It's very accurate and reliable if properly maintained. Maintenance in the field is difficult due to the need for tools and skill. The AK is not so accurate, but can be run and maintained by a 12 year old with a can of motor oil and a string. Both platforms have their uses. A thing that I think is revealing about their design philosophies is that on the AR the select switch goes from safe to semi to full. The AK select switch goes from safe to full to semi. Also I'm left handed. The AK platform is right hand only. I own 2 left handed AR's. So it's all AR's for serious shooting and AK's for fun and last ditch efforts.
    War to the Knife, Knife to the hilt.
    If we don't want to live in a trashy area, we all have to be willing to help pick up the trash.

  6. #5
    Oh boy, are you gonna get an earlful ...

    I have an AK and like it. I have no AR so far simply because they are pricier and I have not seen one that I really had to have. I do however have a Kel Tec SU16B which while technically not an AR pretty much works like one. In fact it has a hybrid bolt/piston system using ideas from both the AR and AK.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    1,880
    I have both. As a recreational shooter I wouldn't be able to decide. They're both a lot of fun (but that goes for most guns....bang = fun!). Under my present circumstances (a relatively quiet life in suburbia) if I ever needed an assault rifle, I'd probably grab my AR. It's clean, broken-in, pinpoint accurate, and will function every time I squeeze the trigger. Now if I were out in the sticks with my life depending on my rifle, I'd take a pre-ban, numbers-matching AK any day of the week. The utter simplicity and almost indestructible nature of this weapon makes it hard to say "no" to. Unfortunately the same reliability isn't always available in today's hybrid/mutant/Frankenstein-like hodgepodge AKs that are for sale in this country. We can thank the positively ridiculous USC 922r law for that.
    (Insert random tough-guy quote here)
    "See my gun?? Aren't you impressed?" - Anonymous sheepdog
    The hardware is the same, but the software is vastly different.

  8. For years I only shot my two AR-15s but when the price of 5.56 Ammo. started inching up, I bought my first AK-47 a SGL-20 7.62x39 well now I have two SGL-20s and a SGL-31-74 5.45x39 also my trusty TGI AMD-65 7.62x39.
    I enjoy them all and would not sell any of them.
    I sure can clean my AKs a lot faster then my ARs. ;-)

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Rocky River, Ohio
    Posts
    1,519
    I've shot:
    • Chinese AK-47s
    • Romanian AKMs, AKMSes, and RPKs
    • M16A1s
    • Various AR15s, including Colt, Eagle, etc.


    The Kalashnikov has it over the M16 and AR15 in pure reliability under adverse conditions. This is due largely to the piston operation and looser tolerances.

    The M16/AR15 has it over the Kalashnikov in pure accuracy. This is due largely to tighter tolerances and MUCH better sights.

    At one time I was getting some death threats from neo-Nazis and decided I needed a modern long gun. My choice was between a Kalashnikov and an AR15. I chose to assemble an AR15 using a used Eagle lower and 16" and 20" A2 uppers. I chose the AR15 for the following reasons:
    • greater inherent accuracy
    • best user controls of ANY semi-auto long gun
    • wide availability of parts and accessories
    • easy interchangeability of uppers, barrels and caliber
    • long term availability of ammunition and components


    My use was primarily in an urban/small town environment.

    If I thought that I was going to be in an adverse environment, I would probably pick an Arsenal Kalashnikov (AK-103?) in 5.56x45mm. It's accurate enough, and EXTREMELY reliable.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by Deanimator View Post
    I've shot:
    • Chinese AK-47s
    • Romanian AKMs, AKMSes, and RPKs
    • M16A1s
    • Various AR15s, including Colt, Eagle, etc.


    The Kalashnikov has it over the M16 and AR15 in pure reliability under adverse conditions. This is due largely to the piston operation and looser tolerances.

    The M16/AR15 has it over the Kalashnikov in pure accuracy. This is due largely to tighter tolerances and MUCH better sights.

    At one time I was getting some death threats from neo-Nazis and decided I needed a modern long gun. My choice was between a Kalashnikov and an AR15. I chose to assemble an AR15 using a used Eagle lower and 16" and 20" A2 uppers. I chose the AR15 for the following reasons:
    • greater inherent accuracy
    • best user controls of ANY semi-auto long gun
    • wide availability of parts and accessories
    • easy interchangeability of uppers, barrels and caliber
    • long term availability of ammunition and components


    My use was primarily in an urban/small town environment.

    If I thought that I was going to be in an adverse environment, I would probably pick an Arsenal Kalashnikov (AK-103?) in 5.56x45mm. It's accurate enough, and EXTREMELY reliable.
    I don't find any real problem with accuracy with my AKs against my ARs, but again I am not into .1 MOA type shooting.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Pasco, Washington, United States
    Posts
    6,271
    Quote Originally Posted by rifleshooter474:218976
    Quote Originally Posted by Deanimator View Post
    I've shot:
    • Chinese AK-47s
    • Romanian AKMs, AKMSes, and RPKs
    • M16A1s
    • Various AR15s, including Colt, Eagle, etc.


    The Kalashnikov has it over the M16 and AR15 in pure reliability under adverse conditions. This is due largely to the piston operation and looser tolerances.

    The M16/AR15 has it over the Kalashnikov in pure accuracy. This is due largely to tighter tolerances and MUCH better sights.

    At one time I was getting some death threats from neo-Nazis and decided I needed a modern long gun. My choice was between a Kalashnikov and an AR15. I chose to assemble an AR15 using a used Eagle lower and 16" and 20" A2 uppers. I chose the AR15 for the following reasons:
    • greater inherent accuracy
    • best user controls of ANY semi-auto long gun
    • wide availability of parts and accessories
    • easy interchangeability of uppers, barrels and caliber
    • long term availability of ammunition and components


    My use was primarily in an urban/small town environment.

    If I thought that I was going to be in an adverse environment, I would probably pick an Arsenal Kalashnikov (AK-103?) in 5.56x45mm. It's accurate enough, and EXTREMELY reliable.
    I don't find any real problem with accuracy with my AKs against my ARs, but again I am not into .1 MOA type shooting.
    Yeah, that's my queston. I do not own either yet :-(. I have a friend with an ak in .223 and an ar he built (do not know which manufacturer of each part). His ak seemed accurate enough to me.

    When you guys say the AR is more accurate...is it such a difference that its a main deciding factor? Maybe I'm just not good enough with a rifle to feel the difference.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast