George W's War
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: George W's War

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Painesville, Ohio
    Posts
    68

    George W's War

    Found this on another forum---thought it was interesting....

    By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
    Posted Friday, June 20, 2008 4:20 PM PT

    No one likes war. War is a horrific affair, bloody and expensive. Sending our men and women into battle to perhaps die or be maimed is an unconscionable thought.

    Yet some wars need to be waged, and someone needs to lead. The citizenry and Congress are often ambivalent or largely opposed to any given war. It's up to our leader to convince them. That's why we call the leader "Commander in Chief."

    George W.'s war was no different. There was lots of resistance to it. Many in Congress were vehemently against the idea. The Commander in Chief had to lobby for legislative approval.

    Along with supporters, George W. used the force of his convictions, the power of his title and every ounce of moral suasion he could muster to rally support. He had to assure Congress and the public that the war was morally justified, winnable and affordable.

    Congress eventually came around and voted overwhelmingly to wage war.

    George W. then lobbied foreign governments for support. But in the end, only one European nation helped us. The rest of the world sat on its hands and watched.

    After a few quick victories, things started to go bad. There were many dark days when all the news was discouraging. Casualties began to mount. It became obvious that our forces were too small. Congress began to drag its feet about funding the effort.

    Many who had voted to support the war just a few years earlier were beginning to speak against it and accuse the Commander in Chief of misleading them. Many critics began to call him incompetent, an idiot and even a liar. Journalists joined the negative chorus with a vengeance.

    As the war entered its fourth year, the public began to grow weary of the conflict and the casualties. George W.'s popularity plummeted. Yet through it all, he stood firm, supporting the troops and endorsing the struggle.

    Without his unwavering support, the war would have surely ended, then and there, in overwhelming and total defeat.

    At this darkest of times, he began to make some changes. More troops were added and trained. Some advisers were shuffled, and new generals installed.

    Then, unexpectedly and gradually, things began to improve. Now it was the enemy that appeared to be growing weary of the lengthy conflict and losing support. Victories began to come, and hope returned.

    Many critics in Congress and the press said the improvements were just George W.'s good luck. The progress, they said, would be temporary. He knew, however, that in warfare good fortune counts.

    Then, in the unlikeliest of circumstances and perhaps the most historic example of military luck, the enemy blundered and was resoundingly defeated. After six long years of war, the Commander in Chief basked in a most hard-fought victory.

    So on that historic day, Oct. 19, 1781, in a place called Yorktown , a satisfied George Washington sat upon his beautiful white horse and accepted the surrender of Lord Cornwallis, effectively ending the Revolutionary War.
    __________________
    "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't
    pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for,
    protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend
    our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it
    was once like in the United States where men were free." -- Ronald Reagan

    "We The People"

    "The Pro Gun Blog"

  2.   
  3. #2
    I just sold my horse. I have a pitcure on General Wasington kneeling beside his horse in prayer. History will repeat itself if we don't learn from it. Where are we now?

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Everything in this story is absolutely true. I'm just wondering if this story is intended to make readers believe that the current George W. is in any way comparable to the father of our country, because he is not, never has been and never will be. The reason there is a United States today is because of George Washington. Today's war on terror, which without a doubt is an existential issue comparable to the birth of this nation, would have been handled much better by General Washington than by President Bush.

  5. #4
    My Daddy got to have a war, and I want one too.
    The more I practice, the 'luckier' I get!

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by gordo View Post
    My Daddy got to have a war, and I want one too.
    Close.... My Daddy didn't finish what he started, so I have to.
    New York State Consolidated Laws, Civil Rights, Article 2-Bill of Rights, Section 4

    S 4. Right to keep and bear arms. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed.

  7. #6
    His Daddy stated that the goal was to drive them out of Kuwait and back to their own country. That is how he got backing from so many nations, including the Middle East. Once that goal was achieved, he had no choise but to cease hostilities.
    The more I practice, the 'luckier' I get!

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    My observation: We haven't been attacked in the Homeland since we put the terrorist on the run.....FACT.
    agree 100%

    that fact may indeed change if we get a surrender monkey in the white house this november.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast