"The Firearms Statistics That Gun Control Advocates Donít Want to See" The Blaze
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: "The Firearms Statistics That Gun Control Advocates Donít Want to See" The Blaze

  1. #1
    ezkl2230 Guest

    "The Firearms Statistics That Gun Control Advocates Donít Want to See" The Blaze

    An excellent article published by the Blaze and posted on Yahoo News.

    "According to data from the FBI's uniform crime reports, California had the highest number of gun murders in 2011 with 1,220 -- which makes up 68 percent of all murders in the state that year and equates to 3.25 murders per 100,000 people.

    The irony of such a grisly distinction is evident when you look at which state was named the state with the strongest gun control laws in 2011 by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. You guessed it -- it was California.

    "What is very unusual is that California also has a program by which we can remove guns, recover guns from people who have a gun and then subsequently become prohibited or dangerous," Brady Campaign spokeswoman Amanda Wilcox said at the time."
    Hmmm... They have a program to remove or recover guns. We can see how well THAT'S working, eh Brady?!

    The Firearms Statistics That Gun Control Advocates Don?t Want to See

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Western South Dakota
    Posts
    1,021
    Facts? The gun grabbers don't need no steenkin' facts!
    Never argue with a red-haired witch. It wastes your breath and only delays the inevitable. --the collected sayings of Wiz Zumwalt

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Creswell, Oregon
    Posts
    3,865
    Special interests will only latch onto facts and figures that fit their agenda. That's why it's up to us to research on our own to find the truth. Whether you agree or not, all special interests cherry pick the stats they use.
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  5. #4
    The gun grabbers' strategy: get two people, one politician and one tv talking head and let them lead the gun debate and spew uninformed, illogical, illegal information to the public. You have Joe Biden on one hand who does not have a clue when it comes to self defense and recommends a double barrel shotgun as the best self defense weapon. Yeah, that was an awesome choice 125 years ago but now they have much more modern, tatical solutions. He goes even further to advise that you fire two warning shots in random directions out your door if you think there is someone trying to enter your home unlawfully. Then you have Pierce Morgan who I cannot even look at and take seriously not to mention feeling just a little bit sick to my stomach. The irony is that he is from a country who has outlawed the personal ownership of firearms and the violent crime rate has risen. He tries to spin the facts but we all know that more guns in the hands of law abiding people means less violent crime. The other irony is that the United States fought an "against all odds" war with the same country and we won our independence. We also kept our independence due to the fact that we have a 2nd amendment. These two people do not have their facts straight nor do they understand the meaning of liberty. The ultimate goal of a gun grab is to control the people, not guns. Expose violent "gun" murders and exploite them to pull on the heart strings of the people to hopefully manufacture consent to destroy our rights in hopes that in return we receive more security.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast