95% recoil reduction???
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 95% recoil reduction???

  1. #1

    95% recoil reduction???

    I find this a little hard to swallow, but if true , I think I would go for it.

    Stealth IR - Recoil Reduction

    There is a demo if you click on the HERE button and more info if you click on the PRICE button.
    There are more demo movies if you click on TOP GUN at the top of the page.

    So, what are your thoughts and comments? If it is all it is cracked up to be, I would think the military and police would be already using it. (Then again, maybe they are.)
    The more I practice, the 'luckier' I get!

  2.   
  3. #2
    I checked with Ignatius Piazza of FrontSight today and he said "They work but adversely affect the reliability of the weapon" so , to me, it is a definite 'No Go' item.
    Last edited by gordo; 10-17-2008 at 12:06 AM.
    The more I practice, the 'luckier' I get!

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,675
    I don't put much stock in the photos. The weapon in the left hand is probably showing more felt recoil because the person is right handed. I'm pretty sure that any weapon being shot by my left hand would do that too, with or without the recoil reduction insert.

  5. It's called a compensator. Models are made for most all firearms. Cmon man

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Terminal Lance View Post
    It's called a compensator. Models are made for most all firearms. Cmon man
    Why are we digging up all of these old dead threads?

  7. Quote Originally Posted by G50AE View Post
    Why are we digging up all of these old dead threads?
    I joined this forum less than two months ago...i dig up nothing. lol

  8. #7
    After two and a half years, I'd say the discusion is basically dead.

  9. #8

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by G50AE View Post
    After two and a half years, I'd say the discusion is basically dead.
    G: The man said he just joined this forum less than two months ago, consequently, it is relatively new to him. If you consider it dead, why did you read it?

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldgrunt View Post
    G: The man said he just joined this forum less than two months ago, consequently, it is relatively new to him. If you consider it dead, why did you read it?
    Because it popped up it's ugly head...Like a zombie.
    We're supposed to shoot zombies until they're dead again right?

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    St. Louis County, MO
    Posts
    3,445
    Quote Originally Posted by Booga View Post
    Because it popped up it's ugly head...Like a zombie.
    We're supposed to shoot zombies until they're dead again right?
    You'd be wasting your bullets...save it for something more exciting and useful. Leave him alone. This topic is new to me too as I was absent when this subject was brought up.
    "Don't let the door hit ya where the dawg shudda bit ya!"
    G'day and Glock
    GATEWAY SWIFT WING ST. LOUIS

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast