Florida CCW - Page 2
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: Florida CCW

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Republic of Dead Cell Holler, Occupied Territories of AL, former USA
    Posts
    7,759
    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Boff, we all could probably do our own research to avoid gettin' jumped on but what would make the point of the message board?? Everything we want to know about guns or laws, we could have just as easier not even made an account here and relied on other sources of info.

    In a way I get your point but dam man, you don't have to be snide about it. S&M645 gave good input and that was it, just as the OP was asking and didn't spout off "due diligence" nonsense basically telling the OP to find his own info all by himself.
    S&M?
    No one has ever heard me say that I "hate" cops, because I don't. This is why I will never trust one again though: You just never know...

  2.   
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Boff, we all could probably do our own research to avoid gettin' jumped on but what would make the point of the message board?? Everything we want to know about guns or laws, we could have just as easier not even made an account here and relied on other sources of info.

    In a way I get your point but dam man, you don't have to be snide about it. S&M645 gave good input and that was it, just as the OP was asking and didn't spout off "due diligence" nonsense basically telling the OP to find his own info all by himself.
    Since you insist in continuing this topic, lets dissect the OP, shall we:

    Quote Originally Posted by sitki1 View Post
    I am trying to find in the Statutes where it says a student must fire a weapon to qualify to apply for a CCW in Florida and how many rounds. Does any know where to find that information?
    To which my response was:

    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    There is no law in Florida that states the answer to your question. If you would have done your own due diligence and actually visited the Florida Concealed Weapons License Web page, you would know what Acceptable Training Documentation is needed and what the applicable statutes are.
    Hmm, let's see. Wouldn't anyone seeking to acquire a Florida Concealed Weapons License go to the official Florida Concealed Weapons License Web page of the state of Florida in the first place? That is what due diligence would be about, but the OP replied with:

    Quote Originally Posted by sitki1 View Post
    i did my due diligence, thank you, and didn't see the answer to my question thus the question you jerk!
    To which I replied:

    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sitki1 View Post
    i did my due diligence, thank you, and didn't see the answer to my question thus the question you jerk!
    Take it easy. Such language can you easily get banned from the forum. And no, you did not do your due diligence. The main Florida Concealed Weapons License Web page has the link to the 2016 Florida Statute Section 790.06 in its very first sentence. S&W645 already pointed out the content of 790.06 (2)(h)7.:

    ... certifying that he or she observed the student safely handle and discharge the firearm in his or her physical presence and that the discharge of the firearm included live fire using a firearm and ammunition as defined in s. 790.001;
    S&W645 correctly pointed out that the minimum is one, as live fire is required. The type of firearm is not specified. According to 790.001 (6), it can be even a starter gun. There is no actual number of shots specified in the law. It can be one.

    I guess not reading the applicable law counts as due diligence these days. SMH
    Could my original reply be more polite? Sure, but then the OP could have also just simply done his due diligence.

    I provided the OP with the information requested, even though it was easy to find and he should have been able to find it without any assistance. I merely suggested that the OP was asking forum members to do his own homework: do a Google search for "Florida Concealed Weapons License", click on the first link and start reading. In response, I was called a jerk.

    The OP simply didn't like to be called out for not
    doing his own homework, so he resulted to an insult. SMH

  4. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by BluesStringer View Post
    S&M?
    Really?? You're gonna post over a typo? So, so sorry I typed an M instead of a W. What a way to nitpick.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Since you insist in continuing this topic, lets dissect the OP, shall we:



    To which my response was:



    Hmm, let's see. Wouldn't anyone seeking to acquire a Florida Concealed Weapons License go to the official Florida Concealed Weapons License Web page of the state of Florida in the first place? That is what due diligence would be about, but the OP replied with:



    To which I replied:



    Could my original reply be more polite? Sure, but then the OP could have also just simply done his due diligence.

    I provided the OP with the information requested, even though it was easy to find and he should have been able to find it without any assistance. I merely suggested that the OP was asking forum members to do his own homework: do a Google search for "Florida Concealed Weapons License", click on the first link and start reading. In response, I was called a jerk.

    The OP simply didn't like to be called out for not
    doing his own homework, so he resulted to an insult. SMH
    Coulda been a little nicer about it, that's all I was sayin'. You're actin' like it's such a serious crime that he didn't make a harder effort to find his info on his own first before posting here. Isn't that what we're here for??

    I ain't tellin' you what to post or how to post it, just sayin that bein' a smart ass ain't necessary.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Coulda been a little nicer about it, that's all I was sayin'. You're actin' like it's such a serious crime that he didn't make a harder effort to find his info on his own first before posting here. Isn't that what we're here for??

    I ain't tellin' you what to post or how to post it, just sayin that bein' a smart ass ain't necessary.
    Well, I am not here for the lazy guy who thinks he is entitled to be delivered everything he asks for on a silver plate. I am also not acting like this is a serious crime, otherwise I would have asked to ban the OP as soon as he called me a jerk. I used my language (asking for due diligence) and he used his language (calling me a jerk). Judge for yourself.

  7. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Well, I am not here for the lazy guy who thinks he is entitled to be delivered everything he asks for on a silver plate.
    So now he's lazy and asking for everything on a silver platter... wow. Lol. If that's how you feel why didn't you even bother posting?

    I am also not acting like this is a serious crime......
    Sure kinda sounds that way.
    .....otherwise I would have asked to ban the OP as soon as he called me a jerk. I used my language (asking for due diligence) and he used his language (calling me a jerk). Judge for yourself.
    Yeah, it was kinda harsh but you did kinda try to make the guy out to look like an idiot with your post.

    You judge for yourself on that one.

    It ain't that hard to pass up a thread and just leave it be if you can't just answer the person's question and be done with it.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Well, I am not here for the lazy guy who thinks he is entitled to be delivered everything he asks for on a silver plate.
    So now he's lazy and asking for everything on a silver platter... wow. Lol. If that's how you feel why didn't you even bother posting?
    I responded with the correct information, especially since other forum members often don't get it right. Yes, that means for example you in that air travel thread. The point of my response was to make the OP aware of the fact that the correct information is readily available if he is willing to do a simple Google search. The alternative, asking random people on an Internet gun forum, can lead to the wrong information.

    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    I am also not acting like this is a serious crime, ...
    Sure kinda sounds that way.
    The only one acting here is you. Is it such a crime to tell someone to do his own due diligence? According to you it seems. Otherwise, why are you continuing with this off-topic discussion. I let it go after Blueshell's post, but you had to pile on.

    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    ... otherwise I would have asked to ban the OP as soon as he called me a jerk. I used my language (asking for due diligence) and he used his language (calling me a jerk). Judge for yourself.
    Yeah, it was kinda harsh but you did kinda try to make the guy out to look like an idiot with your post.

    You judge for yourself on that one.

    It ain't that hard to pass up a thread and just leave it be if you can't just answer the person's question and be done with it.
    Many forum members look like idiots once in a while, some every single day. I call them out when I see it. Get over it. This isn't a microagression-free safe space.

  9. #18

    Florida CCW

    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    I responded with the correct information, especially since other forum members often don't get it right.
    Good.
    Yes, that means for example you in that air travel thread.
    Hardly the same thing pal. I posted what I said more as a misguided and uneducated question. It's not my fault you and one other took what I said as I was saying it as my opinion when I wasn't. Keep beatin' THAT dead horse to an even more bloody pulp.

    The point of my response was to make the OP aware of the fact that the correct information is readily available if he is willing to do a simple Google search. The alternative, asking random people on an Internet gun forum, can lead to the wrong information.
    Again, good.
    The only one acting here is you. Is it such a crime to tell someone to do his own due diligence? According to you it seems.
    No, it's not. Just sayin people who respond don't need to be a snide about it.
    Many forum members look like idiots once in a while, some every single day. I call them out when I see it. Get over it.
    Yeah, I agree. I just didn't think this person deserved the same treatment but whatever.
    This isn't a microagression-free safe space.
    Then don't get all defensive when someone calls you a jerk over it.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Hardly the same thing pal. I posted what I said more as a misguided and uneducated question. It's not my fault you and one other took it as I said what I said as I was saying it as my opinion. Keep beatin' the dead horse to an even more bloody pulp.
    Sometimes, people with zero knowledge about the topic will respond and send the OP in the completely wrong direction. That's why one should go for the original source of information when it is easily available. This one was easily available, hence my "due diligence" reply.

    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    No, it's not. Just sayin people who respond don't need to be a snide about it.
    So, telling someone to do his own due diligence is now being snide. Got it, Mr. Sensitive.

    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Yeah, I agree. I just didn't think this person deserved the same treatment but whatever.
    The OP can speak for himself and did. You do understand that you made it worse by continuing this farce, right?

    Quote Originally Posted by corneileous View Post
    Then don't get all defensive when someone calls you a jerk over it.
    I didn't! You apparently didn't read my post #6. I let the jerk statement slide. I politely stated why the OP did not do his due diligence.

  11. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    So, telling someone to do his own due diligence is now being snide.
    Lol, it wasn't what you said, it was the way you said it.
    Got it, Mr. Sensitive.
    Sensitivity ain't got a darn thing to do with it. If I was that thin-skinned or that sensitive I would never joined up.

    Nice assumption though.

    The OP can speak for himself and did. You do understand that you made it worse by continuing this farce, right?
    How did I make it worse? I just simply said you coulda been a little nicer and not try to make people out to sound like a dumbass for asking a question here.

    Didn't he say he looked before hand and said he came up empty??

    I didn't! You apparently didn't read my post #6. I let the jerk statement slide. I politely stated why the OP did not do his due diligence.
    Again, it was how you came off. Why can't you accept that?

    But whatever, there's no sense arguing any further.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast