Federal Judge Upholds Gun Ban at Atlanta airport
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Federal Judge Upholds Gun Ban at Atlanta airport

  1. #1

    Angry Federal Judge Upholds Gun Ban at Atlanta airport

    FOXNews.com - Federal Judge Upholds Gun Ban at Atlanta airport - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

    I hope this doens't negate anymore of HB 89....

    ATLANTA A federal judge on Monday upheld a gun ban at the world's busiest airport, dealing a blow to gun rights groups who argued a new Georgia law authorized them to carry weapons in certain parts of the Atlanta airport.

    U.S. District Judge Marvin Shoob expressed concern that allowing guns at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport could cause significant economic damage and could be a "serious threat to public safety and welfare."

    His decision rejected a request by GeorgiaCarry.org that would have temporarily allowed gun owners to carry their weapons in the airport until his final ruling on the gun ban a challenge that could likely last months.

    The legal showdown erupted when the state law that allows people with a concealed weapons permit to carry guns into restaurants, state parks and on public transportation took effect on July 1.

    City officials quickly declared the airport a "gun-free zone" and warned that anyone carrying a gun there would be arrested.

    GeorgiaCarry.org sued the city and the airport, claiming that the airport qualifies as mass transportation under the new state law. Attorney John Monroe told the judge repeatedly that no law makes it a crime for residents with permits to bring their guns into terminals, parking lots and other unsecured areas.

    A U.S. Supreme Court ruling this year clarified that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to own working guns, and struck down a Washington D.C. metro ban on private gun ownership.

    Gov. Sonny Perdue, who signed the bill into law in May, supports the lawsuit. The Republican suggested that his own wife might want to carry a firearm for long walks between the parking lot and the airport's terminal.

    City officials have angrily fired back, arguing that allowing some residents to carry guns at the airport could pose a dire threat to the millions of passengers it serves each year. Even an accidental firearm discharge, they say, could cause mayhem.

    "First, you're going to have a stampede," said Robert Kennedy, the airport's assistant general manager.

    Meanwhile, airport officials are quietly devising a backup plan.

    They have asked the Transportation Security Administration to amend the airport's federal security program so that guns are banned in all areas, including certain parking facilities.

    TSA officials said the agency is reviewing the request, the first such appeal it has ever received.

    Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, has also urged the agency to strengthen its restrictions and warned that Congress could intervene if national regulations are not adopted.

    The judge's ruling was a defeat for GeorgiaCarry.org, a two-year-old group that has won a string of victories reversing city and county firearm restrictions around the state.

    But state Rep. Tim Bearden, a Republican who co-sponsored the law, said it was only a temporary setback.

    "In the long run, the Constitution always prevails," said Bearden, a former police officer who wore a yellow tie imprinted with the document's words. "At least, it's supposed to."

  2.   
  3. #2
    Georgiacarry is still working on this. It's not a done deal yet.

  4. So then how do they expect those of us who have checked out firearms with baggage to get our weapons from baggage claim to our vehicles and vice versa? Does FOPA apply?

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by ToneGrail View Post
    So then how do they expect those of us who have checked out firearms with baggage to get our weapons from baggage claim to our vehicles and vice versa? Does FOPA apply?
    Magic mean anything to you :-)

  6. #5
    Actually all the judge did was to deny GCO's request for a temporary restraining order until the suit is resolved. So Atlanta gets to keep violating Georgia law while the matter is litigated.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    I honestly don't see what business a federal court had even getting involved in this case.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
    I honestly don't see what business a federal court had even getting involved in this case.
    That was a decision by GeorgiaCarry.org to file suit in federal court.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by johnsteele View Post
    That was a decision by GeorgiaCarry.org to file suit in federal court.
    I know that. It just seems to me that this is a matter that federal courts wouldn't have any jurisdiction over.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast