Training Schools and Attitudes
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Training Schools and Attitudes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255

    Lightbulb Training Schools and Attitudes

    Some controversy is emerging in the gun community regarding a video posted on Facebook by Chris Henderson from 3 Doors Down. This video is from James Yeager's Tactical Response Fighting Pistol class that includes a wheelchair participant that shoots from behind the firing line. Bob Owens from Bearing Arms wrote an article (hit piece) about this and linked the video for people that do not have a Facebook account.

    My personal opinion: The concept of a firing line is one of many range safety concepts, such as the unload and show clear procedure. They are meant to reduce the risk of injury or death during training and to reduce the risk for the training school. This concept, like so many other range safety concepts, however, has no bearing on real life. There is no firing line when you defend your life. Someone may be shooting at the attacker from behind you. Someone innocent may be in front of you. The 4 rules of firearm safety say nothing about a firing line.

    Training Schools and Attitudes-gunsite-rules-e1472239553738.png

    This is not the first time Tactical Response has come under attack by the gun community for violating their safety rules. Jay Gibson is their famous Downrange Photographer.



    PS: Keep responses civil.

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Republic of Dead Cell Holler, Occupied Territories of AL, former USA
    Posts
    7,763
    I quit taking into consideration just about anything Bob Owens says a couple or three years ago.

    As far as Mr. Gibson being downrange taking pictures during a live-fire session, I have no quarrel at all with his own explanation, albeit about a different session than the video posted by Chris Henderson. Same basic issue, and the explanation applies equally to my way of thinking:

    Caution, Language Warning, probably NSFW and definitely not safe for those afflicted with political correctness syndrome:

    No one has ever heard me say that I "hate" cops, because I don't. This is why I will never trust one again though: You just never know...

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    SC Lowcountry
    Posts
    1,550
    Oh, my! There are safe ways for wheelchair shooters to participate in training but this is not one of them.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    SC Lowcountry
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    . . . Jay Gibson is their famous Downrange Photographer....
    Are you sure he's not the late Jay Gibson?

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Republic of Dead Cell Holler, Occupied Territories of AL, former USA
    Posts
    7,763
    Chris Henderson wrote a reply yesterday to the hubbub surrounding the video and his response(s) to it. It does contradict at least one thing Mr. Gibson said, that he would do such things for and with some people, but not with others, based on his evaluation of their level of training, which he said, he is the provider of, so he's the only one who can validly evaluate them. Henderson says though, that no one in that class had ever met each other or trained there before, so Gibson had no way to evaluate how well or ill-prepared the guy in the wheelchair was to engage that target without hurting or killing someone else.

    Gibson's training techniques could certainly end badly for him, his students and Tactical Response's exposure to huge liability judgments if that is their normal practice. Henderson also says that they were not made aware that that kind of live-fire exercise might take place during their training. Assuming that part is true, if I'd been on the front line, turned around and saw what was happening, I would've hugged the deck and low-crawled away from the behind-the-line fire, then gathered my stuff and split, assuring that I'd live to fight for a refund another day. If they tell their students that that kind of exercise might come up in the normal course of training, then they have nothing to complain about and likely Tactical Response has no liability issues assuming all the releases from liability are specific enough to cover running such an exercise. Informed consent seems to be the key here. Henderson has a valid complaint if informed consent was absent.

    I have no idea who's telling the accurate truth here, if indeed, either of them are. They say you get what you pay for, but if a beginner student shoots one of his classmates in the back during a similar exercise there, I seriously doubt the injured party or his/her surviving family members are going to think that's what he/she paid for.

    Blues
    No one has ever heard me say that I "hate" cops, because I don't. This is why I will never trust one again though: You just never know...

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    3
    I know enough about Tactical Response and James Yeager from Youtube vids to know better then to ever sign up for one of their training sessions. Having said that, if I ever did find myself in a situation like that, with some fool taking photos directly in front of the firing line and/or a wheelchair bound person firing from behind it, I would quickly and quietly leave via the safest method possible and never look back.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Houston, Republic of Texas
    Posts
    199
    The saddest part of this is that so many "non-gun" people will see things like that and assume that these people represent the majority of safe gun handlers in this country.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    There were several reasons why I posted this, bashing James Yeager or Tactical Response wasn't one of them. If you want to do that, feel free to go to James Yeager's Facebook page, getoffthex.com, or talk to him in person at Shot Show or the NRA Annual Meeting.

    Watch this video in its entirety on what this discussion is really about:


  10. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Republic of Dead Cell Holler, Occupied Territories of AL, former USA
    Posts
    7,763
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    There were several reasons why I posted this, bashing James Yeager or Tactical Response wasn't one of them. If you want to do that, feel free to go to James Yeager's Facebook page, getoffthex.com, or talk to him in person at Shot Show or the NRA Annual Meeting.
    This has much less to do with James than with the collective mindset of the NRA, but I'm surprised that the NRA even allows him into any of their meetings.

    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Watch this video in its entirety on what this discussion is really about:

    So just taking the last couple or three lines into consideration, one could surmise that both older videos surfaced again now intentionally to be used in a marketing campaign for the folks who want the imprimatur of legitimacy for thinking of themselves as either the Nine or The One. Novel marketing ploy, gotta give him that.

    I understand the philosophy of training that he espouses before he gets to the marketing punch-line at the end, but the lack of informed consent to what one was buying when they signed up as Henderson claims he lacked, is still a valid complaint if true. It would be more valid I suppose if he didn't wait a year (or more?) to voice it, but not totally invalidated by his delay, or perhaps it was simply indecision, which if it was, James' methods didn't do much to fix that all-too-common-of-a-negative-trait in beginners it would seem.

    I also understand (and practice) training to manage adrenaline dumps, but think that there are safer ways to do it. I didn't say "safe" ways to do it, but simply safer. I would still pack my stuff and leave if that happened at a course when I wasn't informed it might. But then, while I feel no reason to bash James or his business, I'm not a fan boi either. I think it's probable that non-operators who want to be "...one of the Nine, or if you're The One" (James' words, not mine) must've been convinced of being a fan boi somehow. I feel like those who are called to be the Nine or The One most likely heed that call early in life and join the military or the most prestigious law enforcement agency they can qualify for to fulfill that calling. Paying for high-level training is one thing. Paying for the privilege of having bullets whiz past you close enough to feel and clearly hear doesn't seem like "training" most civilians are likely to pay for, so if I'm right about that, I guess I'd be wrong about it being a viable marketing campaign. Oops. I just caught myself being indecisive. I'm dead.

    Blues
    No one has ever heard me say that I "hate" cops, because I don't. This is why I will never trust one again though: You just never know...

  11. #10
    Personally speaking, as an instructor, there is no way in hell I would allow a student to do that (firing with people forward of their position/firing line). I don't train elite military forces, I work with average joe civilians.

    As a student I would have run my ass off laterally if someone was behind me shooting. No way in hell I am letting that happen. I'm not trusting my life to some guy I just met.


    and how about the police their shells?! Holy cow.


    But for me safety and cleanliness aside, I think this video equates that training methods and fighting tactics which work for the able bodied don't necessarily work for the handicapped. As an instructor who has worked with alot of disabled (vets mostly) I have to adjust traditional fundamentals to meet their special needs. Any instructor should adjust their training methods to the skill set of the student.
    -Thomas
    Member, ISRA; NRA Life Member & Instructor; AGI Certified Gunsmith, Illinois Concealed Carry Instructor www.alphakoncepts.com www.gunrights4illinois.com @AlphaKoncepts

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast