Army Looking To Replace The M4
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Army Looking To Replace The M4

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    2,804

    Army Looking To Replace The M4

    I just read this article about the Army, after 50 years, is now looking to replace the M4. Looks like they are going to pick it after an "industry day" on March 30 when they are going to be doing some testing. Definitely will be interesting to see what they pick.

    The article I read is here.


    Memberships: NRA, GOA, USCCA
    Guns: Glock 26, Ruger LCP, Beretta 90-Two .40, Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact 9MM, Beretta Tomcat, Bushmaster Patrolman M4

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Colorado Rocky Mountain High
    Posts
    3,900
    I'd like to see the Army go to the AR 10 M16 ergonomics, M14 caliber what's not to like?
    See, it's mumbo jumbo like that and skinny little lizards like you thinking they the last dragon that gives Kung Fu a bad name.
    http://www.gunrightsmedia.com/ Internet forum dedicated to second amendment

  4. #3
    Below is the Obama Administration's answer to "Special" forces and the replacement of the M4:




  5. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    2,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.357Sig View Post
    Below is the Obama Administration's answer to "Special" forces and the replacement of the M4:
    I heard it would be something more like this.




    (from Men Who Stare At Goats)


    Memberships: NRA, GOA, USCCA
    Guns: Glock 26, Ruger LCP, Beretta 90-Two .40, Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact 9MM, Beretta Tomcat, Bushmaster Patrolman M4

  6. #5
    Well played, sir. Well played.

  7. #6
    Although, I've heard rumor they'll be replacing the pentagon's GI sidearm as well. Here's a finalist from Nobama:


  8. It is a shame our military does not replace it's weapons by selling them via the surplus market. Would have been something nice to look forward to.

  9. Quote Originally Posted by Gobux View Post
    It is a shame our military does not replace it's weapons by selling them via the surplus market. Would have been something nice to look forward to.
    Not even as a receiver-less kit?

  10. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.357Sig View Post
    Although, I've heard rumor they'll be replacing the pentagon's GI sidearm as well. Here's a finalist from Nobama:



    Right on brother...I hate how CommuBama has re-instituted the Assault Weapons Ban, restricted the sale of standard capacity (I consider 17 rounds "standard") magazines, outlawed ammunition, and banned handguns. I can't wait until this crazed Nazi-socialism-facist lowers my taxes again--I hate when these un-American, Bill of Rights hating moderates do crap like that.

  11. #10

    M4

    Anything but the poorly designed gas tube system they have now.
    Delta Force operators are using the HK416.
    75TH Ranger Regiment is also using the HK416 along with the FN-SCAR. Tried and tested. If they work for the elite forces why not outfit the regular line units with them. It's all about reliability.
    GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS...ESPECIALLY OUR SNIPERS

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast