Law May Allow Homeowner To Shoot Intruder
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Law May Allow Homeowner To Shoot Intruder

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    2,803

    Law May Allow Homeowner To Shoot Intruder

    LAS VEGAS -- There’s a popular phrase that says "A man's home is his castle." One Valley lawmaker is trying to get a new law passed that goes even further to protect homes and homeowners’ rights.

    It's called the Castle Doctrine, and it's been passed in more than a dozen states, but not without some controversy.

    The law would allow homeowners to use deadly force on a home intruder, with no regard to whether he or she's retreating.

    “I keep a gun in my house. It's close at hand. My children are gone, so it’s ready ... Not cocked, but it's ready,” said assemblyman Harry Mortenson, D-Nev.

    Mortenson said he not only believes in the right to bear arms, but he also thinks homeowners should be able to use that weapon however they feel necessary, if there’s an attacker in their homes.

    “We are having a real spate of break-ins and crimes in this neighborhood, and I'm very disappointed at what's happening lately,” he said.

    According to Metro police crime stats, the southwest area where Mortenson lives has had 34 burglaries and 11 robberies in just the past month.

    “I'm going to protect myself any way I can, and the castle law is part of that,” Mortenson said.

    He is sponsoring the Castle Doctrine bill.

    Most versions of the law now in use allow a homeowner to use deadly force on any attacker -- whether he or she retreats or not.

    “It's presumed that if somebody comes in your house, they intend to hurt you, and you don't have to wait to warn them. You're just going to do whatever is necessary to protect your home and yourself,” said FOX5 legal analyst Bob Massi.

    Critics of the bill said it will encourage vigilantes, but Massi said it makes sense to him, especially since most also include civil immunity, meaning if a criminal is hurt in the process, he can't sue the homeowner.

    “As crazy as it sounds, those kinds of things can, and in some states do, happen,” Massi said.

    The bill draft will now go to a committee, who will decide whether it goes to a vote.

    Source: Fox 5 Vegas


    Memberships: NRA, GOA, USCCA
    Guns: Glock 26, Ruger LCP, Beretta 90-Two .40, Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact 9MM, Beretta Tomcat, Bushmaster Patrolman M4

  2.   
  3. #2
    Every state should have that law. It is just common sense.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  4. #3
    We should be allowed to protect our property also.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Green Valley (Henderson) NV
    Posts
    853

    Hmm

    I e-mailed Assemblyperson Mortensen asking what's the difference is between his bill and the current statutes which are;


    What needs to happen here is a stand your ground statute similar to what FL and MO have. You have no civil suit immunity if you use force in defense outside of your domicile in Nevada. I also know from being in Clark County NV since 1992, LVMPD and HPD do not arrest the lawful owner or occupant of their domicile in a defense of their home.
    Know the law; don't ask, don't tell.
    NRA & UT Certified Instructor; CT, FL, NH, NV, OR, PA & UT CCW Holder
    Happy new 1984; 25 years behind schedule. Send lawyers, guns and money...the SHTF...

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Belleville, MI & Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    87
    When more politicians have been a victim of a violent crime, will they come to their senses and allow using deadly force against a threat, either actual or supposed. Also, strip the criminals of any possibility of legal action against the homeowner in the event they survive.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,675
    Quote Originally Posted by kwo51 View Post
    We should be allowed to protect our property also.
    You're right. Even though the constitution of the state of New Hampshire specifies that RKBA may be employed in the defense of property, the only state where that's true in practice is Texas.

    As for the title of this thread, I think it's ludicrous that a law is even necessary to protect homeowners who employ deadly force against intruders. I don't know how far existing versions of the law go, but I feel that they need to go further and protect renters; in other words, if a renter shoots an intruder, he cannot be evicted , and the landlord cannot refuse to renew his lease on those grounds.

  8. #7
    Thats a good point also we sould be allowed to carry in our cars even when working.Pizza delivery paper route taxi driver.All good targets.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast