Castle Doctrine in North Carolina? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Castle Doctrine in North Carolina?

  1. #11
    Looks like SB34 has cleared the Senate and is on its way to the House.

    No Lawyers - Only Guns and Money: S. 34 - The Castle Doctrine - Passes NC Senate

    I've been following this one closely and this bill looks damn good to pass, folks. Call. Your. Legislators.

  2.   
  3. I didn't call them but I did email over 130 State Senators, Congressman and Represetatives over the past week concerning SB 34, HB 52, HB 74, HB 111, and HB 63 and National House of Reps HB 822. There's much work going on in both Raleigh and Wash DC in an effort to support our rights...but you have to let them know you need them to continue to support and co-sponsor these bills.
    S&W M&P 40

  4. #13

    Castle Doctrine

    Does anyone have any updates to this? Did it get out of the House unscathed?

  5. #14
    Excellent! About bloody time!

    GG
    Fanatics of any sort are dangerous! -GG-
    Which part of "... shall NOT be infringed..." confuses you?
    Well now, aren't WE a pair, Raggedy Man? (Thunderdome)

  6. Quote Originally Posted by BearArmsLLC View Post
    Does anyone have any updates to this? Did it get out of the House unscathed?
    Not exactly unscathed...Rep Ross, Faison and Hall would like to see it go away...but this year that's not happening. A concession was made for Ross that allows bartenders to ask whether you are carrying when ordering a beer....but that should be thrown out and the pro-2nd amendment lobbyist are seeing to it.

    Here is an update from John Richardson's Blog


    No Lawyers - Only Guns and Money: HB 111 - Concealed Carry In Restaurants And Parks Passes Out Of Committee
    S&W M&P 40

  7. #16
    I have been pretty active in this fight via GRNC. This and the Restaurants & Parks carry bill are the biggest items on our plate right now. Stay informed and keep up the pressure on our elected servants!

  8. #17
    Ross has been a persistant anti-gun fanatic since forever. She was the one who pigeonholed the "Castle Doctrine" in her committee after it passed overwhelmingly in the other chamber. (When still under Dem control, pre '10 election, no less.)

    In short, a one person wrecking crew versus the will of the people.

    Now that her committee is NOT under her control any longer, she can obfuscate, delay, whine, preach and generally show her butt..... but the handwriting is on the wall for passage of some realistic gun rights laws.

    NOT that this is in any way going to deter her from making every effort to introduce other BS Bills to offset or counter any pro-gun gains made.

    She is, simply, a "fanatic". One HAS to wonder about the mind set of a constituency that keeps a fanatic in office!

    Fanatic: Will not change their mind. Cannot chance the subject. Tedious at best.

    GG
    Fanatics of any sort are dangerous! -GG-
    Which part of "... shall NOT be infringed..." confuses you?
    Well now, aren't WE a pair, Raggedy Man? (Thunderdome)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast