Castle Doctrine or not?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Castle Doctrine or not?

  1. #1

    Question Castle Doctrine or not?

    I have heard both ways, that NC is and is not a castle doctrine state. I have also heard Deputy Sheriffs say that even without the castle doctrine that NC residents do not "have a duty to retreat" . Does anyone no what the real deal is?
    Jeff
    NRA GOLDEN EAGLES / LIFE MEMBER
    "They can have my guns, one round at a time . . ."

  2.   
  3. call the pistol permits department. thy should have that info.

  4. #3
    NC Deadly Force Law...no duty to retreat:

    14 51.1. Use of deadly physical force against an intruder.
    (a) A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence is justified in using any degree of force that the occupant reasonably believes is necessary, including deadly force, against an intruder to prevent a forcible entry into the home or residence or to terminate the intruder's unlawful entry (i) if the occupant reasonably apprehends that the intruder may kill or inflict serious bodily harm to the occupant or others in the home or residence, or (ii) if the occupant reasonably believes that the intruder intends to commit a felony in the home or residence.
    (b) A lawful occupant within a home or other place of residence does not have a duty to retreat from an intruder in the circumstances described in this section.
    (c) This section is not intended to repeal, expand, or limit any other defense that may exist under the common law. (1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 673, s. 1.)

    I'm still confused if the Castle Doctrine has been passed or not? There is a petition and more discussion HERE

  5. #4
    I would like to know the results of this because I am in Concord for a couple of weeks.
    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin

  6. #5
    NC Statue 14-51.1

    Looks like a Castle Doctrine to me...if not actually called such....

  7. #6
    I agree 100%. Looks like to me too.
    Jeff
    NRA GOLDEN EAGLES / LIFE MEMBER
    "They can have my guns, one round at a time . . ."

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Moore County, NC
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by mrjam2jab View Post
    NC Statue 14-51.1

    Looks like a Castle Doctrine to me...if not actually called such....

    The problem is in the definition of "Castle Doctrine." In public we do not have the right to stand our ground. In our residence the question comes in where the BG is located. If you read the statute carefully, you can stop someone attempting to break in, but once they are in you better kill them and not wound them.

    An official Castle Doctrine, like that in Florida, is stalled in congress.

    Reap the Vision...
    ...Mike

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC USA
    Posts
    108
    Quote Originally Posted by mbass View Post
    If you read the statute carefully, you can stop someone attempting to break in, but once they are in you better kill them and not wound them.

    An official Castle Doctrine, like that in Florida, is stalled in congress.

    I disagree. According to the statute a homeowner may use "any degree of force that the occupant reasonably believes is necessary" That might mean anything from slapping him to shooting him.

    Furthermore, the statute permits a homeowner to use that force to" Prevent" OR "terminate".
    This is an "or" statute and not an "and" statute. I may, according to the law, use any amount of force to PREVENT unlawful entry. After he has already entered, I may also "any amount" of force to TERMINATE his unlawful entry.

    Nowhere in the statute does it require me to kill an intruder. Suppose someone is climbing in thru my window in the middle of the night and while were both standing in the middle of the living room floor I say "hey you, you have to leave" and he does, then he still has committed a felony burglary, but I am not required to kill him.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Moore County, NC
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by NCjones View Post
    I disagree. According to the statute a homeowner may use "any degree of force that the occupant reasonably believes is necessary" That might mean anything from slapping him to shooting him.

    Furthermore, the statute permits a homeowner to use that force to" Prevent" OR "terminate".
    This is an "or" statute and not an "and" statute. I may, according to the law, use any amount of force to PREVENT unlawful entry. After he has already entered, I may also "any amount" of force to TERMINATE his unlawful entry.

    Nowhere in the statute does it require me to kill an intruder. Suppose someone is climbing in thru my window in the middle of the night and while were both standing in the middle of the living room floor I say "hey you, you have to leave" and he does, then he still has committed a felony burglary, but I am not required to kill him.

    You're missing my point:
    In the state of NC, you may stop someone attempting to B&E, including the use of deadly force. But once they are in, according to the way the law is written, they must be threatening your life in order for you to use deadly force against them.

    So, my point was, you had better kill him if you shoot him, because it is your word against his (as far as the threat). If he is stealing my TV, I will shoot him and claim he was going to smash it over my head! It is my word against his, and he ain't talking!!

    Reap the Vision...
    ...Mike

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC USA
    Posts
    108
    I guess a dead burglar is better than a shot burglar who is going to sue you in civil court any day!
    But I understand the statute to read that one may use any amount of force to 1) stop an intruder whom the homeowner believes is there to A) kill him, or B) inflict serious bodily harm. One doesn't have to believe the intruder is going to kill him, one could believe the intruder is there to seriously harm him. What "serious bodily harm" is would depend on the situation.

    The statute also clearly states that any amount of force (including lethal) is justified if the homeowner reasonably believes the intruder is there to commit a felony. So, your life need not even be in danger if you believe the intruder is there to commit a felony. In North Carolina breaking into an occupied home at night is a felony. Since he's already committed one felony, it wouldn't be far fetched for one to believe he is going to commit another.

    Someone I know just got out of jail because he shot a person who came into his yard and threatened him. The guy got out of the car with a baseball bat. One to the chest and the guy died. No charges were filed, but my friend had to spend a few days in jail until it was all sorted out.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast