Rant Rant.. This woman's attitude really pissed me off!!! - Page 7
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 68 of 68

Thread: Rant Rant.. This woman's attitude really pissed me off!!!

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Treo View Post
    Just so we're clear I am gainfully employed and have never been on the dole.

    When you won't support yourself, and you depend on society to take care of you, you lose some of your privacy rights

    I must not have gotten the memo on that, it's certainly nowhere in the Constitution. How far are we planning to take this? If I'm on welfare but I'm in my own house do I still lose my fourth amendment rights? What if I , out of the goodness of my heart, buy a pack of smokes and give it to a welfare case and it's found in their home? How ,exactly, does the state prove the cigarettes were purcahed W/ welfare funds? What is the punishment? Arrest for welfare fraud? Are you sure you want to OK random searches of people's homes by the State?
    Where did this cigarette thing come from? What the hell does that have to do with the discussion?

  2.   
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Colorado Rocky Mountain High
    Posts
    3,900
    Quote Originally Posted by GOV5 View Post
    Where did this cigarette thing come from? What the hell does that have to do with the discussion?
    The OP posited that lottery tickets , alcohol , and tobacco products shouldn't be purchased w/ welfare money and that welfare reciepents should submit to randon searches of their homes to ensure that they weren't buying such
    See, it's mumbo jumbo like that and skinny little lizards like you thinking they the last dragon that gives Kung Fu a bad name.
    http://www.gunrightsmedia.com/ Internet forum dedicated to second amendment

  4. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Treo View Post
    The OP posited that lottery tickets , alcohol , and tobacco products shouldn't be purchased w/ welfare money and that welfare reciepents should submit to randon searches of their homes to ensure that they weren't buying such
    Well, I'm not for that! First of all, let them buy a lottery ticket. Heck, they might win and we don't have to support them any longer. LOL! As for smokes, I don't see a problem with that either. A BEER OR TWO NEVER HURT ANYBODY either.

    Now, coming in to check on the kids, and the condition of the house? Hell YES!!

  5. #64
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Colorado Rocky Mountain High
    Posts
    3,900
    Quote Originally Posted by GOV5 View Post
    Now, coming in to check on the kids, and the condition of the house? Hell YES!!
    So, you're OK w/ random warantless searches w/ out PC ? Are you sure you want to go down that road?
    See, it's mumbo jumbo like that and skinny little lizards like you thinking they the last dragon that gives Kung Fu a bad name.
    http://www.gunrightsmedia.com/ Internet forum dedicated to second amendment

  6. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by HootmonSccy View Post
    I know this is a Gun Forum..
    But there is plenty of Political stuff and in this case it shows how "the system" has created as bad an attitude as I've ever witnessed..

    This is my 1st real Rant on this forum and it has NOTHING to do with guns..

    Watch this video...
    It's not the situation that necessarily makes me rant, it's the attitude of the woman..

    Listen to what the mother says... WTF??

    Mom with the WRONG Attitude


    Somebody's got to pay for all her kids and her suffering???

    She chooses to have 12 kids and "Somebody" has to pay????

    The "System" did NOT fail.. The Mother FAILED
    Excuse me.. I thought it was HER responsibility to take care of her 12 kids...
    IF she is suffering, then MAYBE she shouldn't of had 12 kids!!!!

    I think children are a blessing of the Lord and each one is very special.. But I chose not to have more than one kid. There is nothing wrong with having 2 or 4 or 8 kids if you want, but they are YOUR responsibility.

    Can you spell "Condom"?? How about "The Pill"??

    On a side note.. I'm Assuming she is already getting Welfare for each of the 12 kids and food stamps and Section 8.. So where did all that $$$ go each month???
    Down the Tubes???
    NO, I think down the PIPE or down the CRACK might be a more accurate statement - I Don't know, Maybe I'm wrong, but I suspect???


    This in not the place or the forum for this kind of trash to be displayed. Like you said, this has nothing to do with the topics of this website. If this is going to be allowed in the future you can pencil me in as GONE!!

  7. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by hangman View Post
    This in not the place or the forum for this kind of trash to be displayed. Like you said, this has nothing to do with the topics of this website. If this is going to be allowed in the future you can pencil me in as GONE!!
    Hello..
    I believe this was entered into the "Off-Topic" category..
    I believe this is "Off-Topic" and thus put in the correct location..
    I would also believe that the "Off-Topic" category was created for items such as this, which are "Off-Topic"..
    If you are only interested in Gun topics, then you should probably not look through the "Off-Topic" category..

    The Posting has been read more than 2,500 times and has had more than 60 posts, SO, it must be of interest to others as well as myself.. I'm sorry the topic is NOT to your liking..

    I'm not sure WHY you think this is Trash.. It is based on a News story that was carried locally in my area.. They seemed to think it was news worthy, and they review many stories that never make it "on the air".

    So, as to your threat... If everyone does not adhere to YOUR standards of posting topics, you are going to pack up and leave..
    Let me save you some frustration..
    There are many varied opinions and personalities on this forum, so I'm sure I won't be the last person to post a topic not your standards

    You should probably leave now..
    Just so that you are not further disgusted with topics that are of interest to other people..

    Gulf Coast, Floriduh
    Sccy is the limit

  8. #67
    For the record I do not work for any drug company and have no financial interest in providing contrceptive technology to people on wellfare beyond that of the average tax payer who has to foot the bill. That being said I do have extensive knowledge of the Norpant contrceptive implant from having done research papers on it for two different classes. (I killed two birds with one slug of 50AE. ) One of the issues brought up in the Catholic Church's Anti-Norplant crusade was the safety of the device and the chemicals it introduced. The Norplant contraceptive implant consists of six sylastic rods that contain the contraceptive chemicals and release them over a 5 1/2 year period providing an effectiveness of 99.6% durring the first five years. The active ingredient, Levonorgestel a synthetic progesterone-like hormone acts in three ways to prevent pregnancy. The active ingredient is also aproved for a handful of other contrceptive aplications, including Capronor (Basically a 6 month norplant), Depo Provera (a monthly injecteable contraceptive), and most recently Plan-B (the emergency contrceptive pill), in addition it is aproved for some hormone therapy programs. If the chemicals in the device are that dangerous, why would the FDA have approved the main active ingredient for several other applications? Another issue brought up was possible increases in rates of Hepatitis-B transmitiion among users of the device. Also a logical deadend as the physician installing the device is supposed to test for liver diseases, there is also a Hep-B vaccine that for some reason is not administered more widespreadly. Clearly the Catholic Church had no medical reason for objecting to the program, they just wanted to push their religious worldview onto others.

    For the record I have a serious problem with a Church that was setup by Nazis, condones sexual assault on children, and allows holocaust denyers to be Bishops to tell me how the welfare system in this country should not be reformed.

  9. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by Treo View Post
    So, you're OK w/ random warantless searches w/ out PC ? Are you sure you want to go down that road?
    For folks on welfare with multiple kids? YEAH, I'm OK with it. In fact, I'm past OK. I'd like to mandate that it happen if I had the power. BUt WHAT are you going in to search for? THAT is the BIG question. I wouldn't be in favor of going in to ransack the place. That's not right either. But a simple walk-thru to make sure the kids are OK, and the place is in order and not trashed, YEAH, I'm for that.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast