Obama's Mistress - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Obama's Mistress

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by NDS View Post
    Another insightful and informative post--it sucks being number 2, doesn't it.
    Repeat after me: "Post Count, Post Count, Post Count..."

    This I believe. Facts are of no importance to his supporters. Many perceive a vote for BHO as a retroactive vote against Bush. Others just want to believe...

    This amazes me; I have always believed the MSM is all about revenue. But in this case they seem to truly support him--to the point of distortion or mendacity.

    That is, of course, opinion--but just because it's opinion does not make it wrong. Unfortunately, it cannot be repeated enough that all politicians fit your description. I can only hope there are some exceptions to the rule ready to take office--somewhere...
    Say what you will, but the fact is the only reason we're seeing or hearing about this, and you're believing it, is that it's an election year, period.

  2.   
  3. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
    Say what you will, but the fact is the only reason we're seeing or hearing about this, and you're believing it, is that it's an election year, period.
    I will say you appear to find it difficult to read for content. I specifically used the phrase 'if this is true' in my original post. Notice BHO supporters have already posted the 'so what--your guy is dishonest too' statements. My point was that the media use 'distortion and mendacity' in their reporting.

    As for my opinion--McCain's lack of moral character was brought up earlier in this campaign---glass houses have nothing to do with old news. McCain has admitted he has no moral character--nobody on the side of BHO would ever do so about TheOne!

    Until you folks wise up and realize that the problem is electing Democrats and Republicans things will continue to worsen.

    You're going to be like those who complain that they never believed Bush would be so bad--or those who complain that they had no idea Clinton was amoral. After BHO has had his turn to trash the country for a while his supporters will make excuses.

    Here's a candidate both parties can support:
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by NDS View Post
    I will say you appear to find it difficult to read for content. I specifically used the phrase 'if this is true' in my original post. Notice BHO supporters have already posted the 'so what--your guy is dishonest too' statements. My point was that the media use 'distortion and mendacity' in their reporting.

    As for my opinion--McCain's lack of moral character was brought up earlier in this campaign---glass houses have nothing to do with old news. McCain has admitted he has no moral character--nobody on the side of BHO would ever do so about TheOne!

    Until you folks wise up and realize that the problem is electing Democrats and Republicans things will continue to worsen.

    You're going to be like those who complain that they never believed Bush would be so bad--or those who complain that they had no idea Clinton was amoral. After BHO has had his turn to trash the country for a while his supporters will make excuses.

    Here's a candidate both parties can support:


    I read every single word. However, if it will make you feel better, I'll bold those parts to which you refer in your responses. Just because I didn't bold it doesn't mean I didn't read it, and it doesn't mean I'm trying to boost my post count, ok?

  5. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
    I read every single word. However, if it will make you feel better, I'll bold those parts to which you refer in your responses. Just because I didn't bold it doesn't mean I didn't read it, and it doesn't mean I'm trying to boost my post count, ok?
    OK.

    My remark about post count was because there was no response by you to the link itself. I did, however, get the feeling that you wished to imply that Hussein was being treated worse than Sidney in this election. While I can never bring myself to support either of these--people--I do believe the Democratic candidate is treated substantially better by media than the Republican. I'll attribute that to the media lacking any pretense of impartiality despite their claim otherwise. That a lot on this board have had more than a sip of the McCain Kool-Aid is a given, and you seem to resent that. It's a gun forum--BHO's historical hostility to gun owners is well documented. That neither candidate will be good for the country is apparent--and while Sidney is no friend of gunowners, Hussein has always been openly hostile to private firearms ownership and appears to have his own unique view of the 2nd amendment which he refuses to define in any detail.


    I guess it boils down to my belief that the next administration is going to be awful. A BHO administration will be more hostile to the 2nd amendment than that of JSM. Beyond that, pay your money and take your choice. Just don't ask me to cast a favorable glance either way.
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by NDS View Post
    OK.

    My remark about post count was because there was no response by you to the link itself. I did, however, get the feeling that you wished to imply that Hussein was being treated worse than Sidney in this election. While I can never bring myself to support either of these--people--I do believe the Democratic candidate is treated substantially better by media than the Republican. I'll attribute that to the media lacking any pretense of impartiality despite their claim otherwise. That a lot on this board have had more than a sip of the McCain Kool-Aid is a given, and you seem to resent that. It's a gun forum--BHO's historical hostility to gun owners is well documented. That neither candidate will be good for the country is apparent--and while Sidney is no friend of gunowners, Hussein has always been openly hostile to private firearms ownership and appears to have his own unique view of the 2nd amendment which he refuses to define in any detail.


    I guess it boils down to my belief that the next administration is going to be awful. A BHO administration will be more hostile to the 2nd amendment than that of JSM. Beyond that, pay your money and take your choice. Just don't ask me to cast a favorable glance either way.
    Here's where I agree with you. With the exception of Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, it is ABSOLUTELY true that the mainstream media heavily favors Obama and the Democratic Party. How anyone can't see that is truly amazing to me. My hometown newspaper, the Post Tribune, is so pro Obama they might as well be campaigning for him.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast