Obama's latest plan
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Obama's latest plan

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650

    Obama's latest plan

    Obama aide promotes job plan, warns automakers - Yahoo! News

    WASHINGTON President-elect Barack Obama signaled Sunday he will move urgently and aggressively to rescue the plunging economy, demanding swift passage by Congress of a massive two-year spending and tax-cutting recovery program. "We're out with the dithering, we're in with a bang," a top Obama aide said.

    Obama's plans, outlined by his transition team on television talk shows, could put aside his campaign pledge to repeal a Bush tax cut for the wealthy. With the downturn in the economy, those tax cuts may remain in place until they are scheduled to die in 2011, said William M. Daley, an economic adviser. "That looks more likely than not," he said.

    Obama aides called on lawmakers to pass, by the Jan. 20 inauguration, legislation that meets Obama's two-year goal of saving or creating 2.5 million jobs. Democratic congressional leaders said they would get to work when Congress convenes Jan. 6.

    Though Obama aides declined to discuss a total cost, it probably would far exceed the $175 billion he proposed during the campaign. Some economists and lawmakers have argued for a two-year plan as large as $700 billion, equal to the Wall Street bailout Congress approved last month.

    "I don't know what the exact number is, but it's going to be a big number. It has to be," said Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee.

    With the wounded economy worsening, the Obama team's new assertiveness was a recognition he needed to soothe financial markets with signs of leadership. It also foreshadowed a more hands-on role by Obama to influence congressional action during the final weeks of the transition.

    Obama will introduce his economic team on Monday, including Timothy Geithner as treasury secretary and Lawrence Summers as head of the National Economic Council. Obama also has settled on New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson as his commerce secretary.

    "We don't have time to waste here," Obama senior adviser David Axelrod said. "We want to hit the ground running on January 20th." Echoing that, the second-ranking House Democrat, Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, said, "We expect to have during the first couple of weeks of January a package for the president's consideration when he takes office."

    Added Goolsbee: "We're out with the dithering. We're in with a bang."

    Obama's team didn't limit itself to the long-term economic recovery.

    Axelrod warned automakers, seeking billions in government help to stave off collapse, to devise a plan to retool and restructure by next month. Otherwise, he said, "there is very little taxpayers can do to help them."

    Axelrod couldn't resist taking a jab at the Big Three executives, who left Congress empty-handed last week after flying into Washington in corporate jets and pleading for money. "I hope that they will come back to Washington in early December on commercial flights with a plan," he said.

    The emphasis on the economy began Saturday when Obama outlined the framework of a plan to save or create 2.5 million jobs by the end of 2010. The scope of the recovery package is far more ambitious than what Obama had spelled out during his presidential campaign, when he proposed $175 billion of spending and tax-cutting stimulus. The new one will be significantly larger and would incorporate his campaign ideas for new jobs in environmentally friendly technologies the "green economy." It also would include his proposals for tax relief for middle- and lower-income workers.

    But there were no plans to balance the tax cuts with an immediate tax increase on the wealthy. During the campaign, Obama said he would pay for increased tax relief by raising taxes on people making more than $250,000.

    "There won't be any tax increases in the January package," said one Obama aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the details of the Obama package have not been fleshed out.

    Obama could delay any tax increase to 2011, when current Bush administration tax cuts expire.

    House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio urged Obama to make that explicit. "Why wouldn't we have the president-elect say, `I am not going to raise taxes on any American in my first two years in office?'"

    In a sign of where the congressional debate might lead, Boehner called for lowering capital gains and corporate income taxes.

    Some economists have endorsed spending up to $600 billion to revive the economy. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and former labor Secretary Robert Reich, a member of Obama's economic advisory board, both suggested $500 billion to $700 billion.

    "I don't know what the number is going to be, but it's going to be a big number," Goolsbee said. "It has to be. The point is to, kind of, get people back on track and startle the thing into submission."

    While Obama in the weekend Democratic radio address said his plan "will mean 2.5 million more jobs by January of 2011," aides said the figure was a net sum of jobs created and jobs saved that would otherwise disappear without government help.

    The adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity said the plan would likely slow down job losses in 2009, but that new jobs probably would not be evident until 2010.

    Obama's plan is both an economic and a political blueprint. By not including tax increases, he silences one potential Republican objection to his plan. If successful, the scope of his plan would set the stage for his other legislative goals, including expanded health care, permanent changes in tax rates and a comprehensive overhaul of energy policy.

    "This package is designed to be a down payment to get his entire agenda started," the aide said.

    Axelrod appeared on "Fox News Sunday" and ABC's "This Week." Schumer was on ABC, Hoyer and Boehner on Fox and Goolsbee was interviewed on "Face the Nation" on CBS. Reich appeared on "Late Edition" on CNN.
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

  2.   
  3. already waffling

    Remember that major pledge to increase taxes on those making over 250K. Most of thos are small businesses with several employees who would probably go belly up if he raised their taxes.And you have to remember the two idiots running running congress...pelosi and reid...who don't have enough brains or moxy between them to pound sand in a rathole.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Although noble, Obama's plan to save jobs, in addition to his health care plan, are putting this country on the fast track to socialism.
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,437
    So...true to his way, Obama has gone back on his promises to his own followers to increase taxes on the wealthy - but he still plans to spend "$500 - 700 billion" to supposedly revive the economy, and will also cut taxes for the lower classes. That sounds like a recipe for intense deficit spending. That's some awfully hilarious "change" there. GWB did the exact same thing.
    Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics

  6. #5
    got ourselves a true politician here... can't say I am surprised.. I thought he was an idiot since day 1.. don't see that opinion "changing" anytime soon.
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  7. #6
    The only question is how big a disaster he will be. I am betting one of mammoth proportions.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    The only question is how big a disaster he will be. I am betting one of mammoth proportions.
    Well, there is talk of him letting the Bush tax cuts lapse instead of passing legislation to repeal them immediately. Hopefully, the promises he goes back on are promises like those. I hope he keeps up that pattern.
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast