No duty to rescue
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: No duty to rescue

  1. #1

    No duty to rescue

    Fox News had on a story about a lady who was raped in a subway station about two years ago while subway employees looked on. The employees did call the police who arrived ten minutes later after the deed was done. She sued and the suit was recently thrown out because NY does not have a duty to rescue. I am outraged!

    First they disarm the people so they can't defend themselves. Then tell others that they have no duty to rescue.

    There is a moral obligation to assist and rescue!!! They did call the police but that's all they did. Could they have done anything else that did not put them in direct jeopardy? In my opinion, yes! How can these subway employees and go home and look theirs or anyone elses daughter in the eyes?

  2.   
  3. #2
    Self defense is an INDIVIDUAL right, that is why the Second Amendment is there.
    "Gun a Month" Club Member

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Central Missouri
    Posts
    124
    To stand by and watch a woman raped is beyond my comprehension. Screw not being able to look at your daughter/wife, etc. I couldn't stand to look at my own mug in the mirror every day, if that had been me. Those weren't men, they were little rodents scurrying around in the gutter, and they should be treated as such
    When it comes to handguns, there are Sig Sauers, then there's everything else.

  5. #4
    While I personally feel that standing by and allowing a woman to be raped is beyond atrocious, and would never do so myself, to permit law suits over failure to rescue would be an atrocity also. Far to many people would abuse the system and sue because someone didn't help them locate Starbucks, or help them when they sprained an ankle. The U.S. is already litigation heavy and adding to that would be wrong. Remember also even the police are not required to "protect" you. This is one more reason we need to continue to fight to protect the 2A.

  6. #5
    A lot of those employees are women, so there possibly were no "men" standing around watching. Personally if I were in that situation I would, in the words of a scene in Pulp Fiction, "go Medieval on his ass."
    The Avatar is my Great-Great Grandaddy, CPL Samuel Francis Bondurant, Co. D, 4th Alabama, Law's Brigade, Benning's Division, 1st Corp, Army of Northern Virginia, shot through right thigh 2 JUL 1863.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick O'Shay View Post
    A lot of those employees are women, so there possibly were no "men" standing around watching. Personally if I were in that situation I would, in the words of a scene in Pulp Fiction, "go Medieval on his ass."
    Gender is no excuse; they could have intervened. Half a dozen or more angry women can overpower an average human male.

    This is a common "onlooker syndrome" that seems to affect large groups of people witnessing an atrocity committed by someone who is not even an authority figure. People don't want to get involved or are simply "frozen to the spot" or whatever. One would think that in this age of media awareness, people would at worst see the opportunity for their 15 minutes of fame.
    Silent Running, by Mike and the Mechanics

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by wingman883 View Post
    Fox News had on a story about a lady who was raped in a subway station about two years ago while subway employees looked on. The employees did call the police who arrived ten minutes later after the deed was done. She sued and the suit was recently thrown out because NY does not have a duty to rescue. I am outraged!

    First they disarm the people so they can't defend themselves. Then tell others that they have no duty to rescue.

    There is a moral obligation to assist and rescue!!! They did call the police but that's all they did. Could they have done anything else that did not put them in direct jeopardy? In my opinion, yes! How can these subway employees and go home and look theirs or anyone elses daughter in the eyes?
    Here's the SCOTUS view on the "obligation" of the government:
    Warren v. District of Columbia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    If you don't protect yourself, nobody else need protect you!
    (I know it's wikipedia--it's an easy link. Post another if you don't like this one)
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast