DC v Heller
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: DC v Heller

  1. #1

    DC v Heller

    Here is a great site to read up on the Supreme Court case that will be heard in Feb. or March and can be a strong force in deciding our next election.
    http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncateg...#comment-12997

  2.   
  3. #2

    Wow!

    Great site. I tracked some of the quotes mentioned throughout the blogginf and found a dozen new ones that will come in handy both for teaching and my 2A points!
    Reality, DEAL with IT!

  4. #3

    DC Fires their Gun Case Lawyer

    I guess they know they are in trouble;

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...010201116.html

    Go to the link and read the sad story. :D


    Tarzan
    1 Timothy 5:8

    "But if any aprovide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel."

  5. #4
    Tarzan,

    That was certainlysome good news. Now DC will try to postpone the hearing of the case because the new team will not have the necessary time to prepare for their arguements.

  6. #5
    Thanks for posting. Lets pray this goes our way.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  7. #6
    Here is the brief in PDF foremat filed by the D.C. legal team. Their only conclusion is that one has to be a member of a "state organized millitia" to possess a firearm. It recognizes no right to self defense except with a dismantled or triggerlocked long gun.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...rief010408.pdf

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chandler
    Posts
    220
    Although I am not a Jew, here is a link to a post on a Jewish pro-gun site that is very pertinent to the pending Supreme Court Case:
    http://www.jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/six-about-2nd.htm
    I only mentioned that I am not a Jew because I am not taking any religious stand on this issue which I feel is a correct stance. Anyway, I think that this is a good article if you look at the whole thing. It even shows some opinions from the Federalist Papers which are also referenced in the D.C. Brief.

    I think that the "preamble" argument of their 4th premise is particularly compelling. The introductory clause "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, " is, indeed, typical of the preambles used in the writing style of the period. Clearly the salient point is: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".
    Last edited by gvaldeg1; 01-11-2008 at 02:57 PM.
    MOLON LABE

  9. #8
    I am not a Jew either. I think JPFO is doing a better job than the NRA protecting our rights.

  10. #9

    Keeping up with District of Columbia v. Heller

    If you haven't been keeping up with District of Columbia v. Heller you really, really need to. Contact erveryone you know. Here is what were up against.

    http://www.abanet.org/publiced/previ...glishProfs.pdf

    Here is the link to review all the briefs that have been filed thus far.

    http://www.abanet.org/publiced/previ...scheduled.html

    then scroll down and find

    District of Columbia v. Heller, Docket No. 07-290

    Please take the time to read all briefs.

    Jim
    Jim
    "Americans have the will to resist because you have weapons. If you don't have a gun, freedom of speech has no power."
    Yoshimi Ishikawa

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast