Gitmo prisoners may resist transfer to Illinois
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Gitmo prisoners may resist transfer to Illinois

  1. #1

    Gitmo prisoners may resist transfer to Illinois

    Hot Air Blog Archive Gitmo prisoners may resist transfer to Illinois

    January 7, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
    What’s worse — living in a secure facility in the tropics where some reasonable social interaction exists, or living in a Supermax facility in icy weather under almost-constant constant lockdown? Mark Hemingway notices a key tidbit in a report on Gitmo from Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff that suggests the Gitmo detainees may sue to stay right where they’re at:
    But the final irony is that many of the detainees may not even want to be transferred to Thomson and could conceivably even raise their own legal roadblocks to allow them to stay at Gitmo.
    Falkoff notes that many of his clients, while they clearly want to go home, are at least being held under Geneva Convention conditions in Guantánamo. At Thomson, he notes, the plans call for them to be thrown into the equivalent of a “supermax” security prison under near-lockdown conditions.
    “As far as our clients are concerned, it’s probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo,” he says.
    Um, aren’t conditions at Gitmo supposed to be a national embarrassment? Aren’t they so bad that it serves as a recruiting tool for al-Qaeda, which apparently really rankles our Chief Executive? Think maybe that’s overblown just a tad?
    The strident left-wing critiques of the Guantanamo facility have all centered around the fact that detainees there are horribly mistreated and conditions unbearable. But when push comes to shove, it would seem concerns about Guantanamo are overblown, and the prisoners there know that being held under the Geneva conventions outside the U.S. is much preferable to a maximum security prison in the U.S.
    Would it be the height of irony if the courts blocked a transfer of inmates from Gitmo on the grounds that the new facility violates Geneva Convention standards — and that Gitmo and the military commissions systems meet them? Indeed it would, if the administration ever tries to make the transfer at all. The prison won’t be ready until 2011, and by that time, a new Congress will be much less likely to allow the transfer, as Isikoff points out in his blog post.
    Let’s root for irony, shall we?
    Conservative Wife & Mom -- I'm a Conservative Christian-American with dual citizenship...the Kingdom of God is my 1st home and the U.S.A. is my 2nd.

  2.   
  3. #2
    ~ “As far as our clients are concerned, it’s probably preferable for them to remain at Guantánamo,” he says.
    Oh Good Grief, These War Criminals are alaready sounding like a prison inmate, Demanding a country club...
    Semper Fi

  4. #3
    They should be housed in D.C. with the rest of the criminals.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    They should be housed in D.C. with the rest of the criminals.
    I think it's hilarious! B. O. can't get anything right and/or make anyone happy. Could be why he's so desperate to get healthcare reform passed...he has to have SOMETHING/ANYTHING for his non-Presidential "legacy".
    Conservative Wife & Mom -- I'm a Conservative Christian-American with dual citizenship...the Kingdom of God is my 1st home and the U.S.A. is my 2nd.

  6. #5
    I am hearing that if health care is passed and it is mandatory that everyone gets coverage or face penalties that there are legal groups ready to challenge the legality in court.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    I am hearing that if health care is passed and it is mandatory that everyone gets coverage or face penalties that there are legal groups ready to challenge the legality in court.
    well now wouldn't that be awesome? they would get my support for sure!
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    I am hearing that if health care is passed and it is mandatory that everyone gets coverage or face penalties that there are legal groups ready to challenge the legality in court.
    I have expected that and am glad to see it. The Constitution makes NO provision for Congress mandating that you have to buy ANYTHING just to be a citizen of this country. I have already decided that I personally will not purchase anything that this Congress requires and damn the consequences. It all starts now. Take a stand.

  9. #8
    Club Gitmo aint so bad after all!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast