This Guy Is An Idiot
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: This Guy Is An Idiot

  1. #1

    This Guy Is An Idiot

    how does this idiot have a show? he acts like such a tool. in regards to this january 26th case... let us all pray for obama.
    by the way does anyone have any info about the pre trial that was supposed to take place on jan 11? I can't find anything about it on google.


    YouTube - Obama Has Court Jan. 26th - Must Prove Eligibility - MSNBC Tries To Block News
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MA, Away from the liberal loonies...
    Posts
    2,658
    That's why the media pisses me off as much as the current president...
    You can give peace a chance alright..

    I'll seek cover in case it goes badly..

  4. #3
    Just goes to show any idiot can get his face on t.v.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Scarecrow View Post
    by the way does anyone have any info about the pre trial that was supposed to take place on jan 11? I can't find anything about it on google.
    If I want to search for info on Obama, Goggle is the LAST search engine that I trust. They're in his pocket. Try http://www.ask.com == bet you'll find what you're looking for!
    Also, check out http://www.obamacitizenshipdebate.org/ Was directed to this website by ask.com
    Conservative Wife & Mom -- I'm a Conservative Christian-American with dual citizenship...the Kingdom of God is my 1st home and the U.S.A. is my 2nd.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gray Court, SC
    Posts
    2,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Scarecrow View Post
    by the way does anyone have any info about the pre trial that was supposed to take place on jan 11? I can't find anything about it on google.
    That's because it never happened. The Judge decided to dismiss the case.

    Judge Carter Dismisses Obama Trail Konfusing Kancer

    IV. DISPOSITION [p.29-30]
    Plaintiffs have expressed frustration with the notion that this case could be dismissed on separation of powers, political question, or standing grounds, asserting that these are mere “technicalities” obstructing Plaintiffs from being able to resolve the case on the merits of President Obama’s birth and constitutional qualifications. As the Supreme Court has stated, “It is indeed a singular misconception of the nature and character of our constitutional system of government to suggest that the settled distinction . . . between judicial authority over justiciable controversies and legislative power as to purely political questions tends to destroy the duty of the judiciary in proper cases to enforce the Constitution.” Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon, 223 U.S. 118, 149-150, 32 S. Ct. 224 (1912). Interpreting the Constitution is a serious and crucial task with which the federal courts of this nation have been entrusted under Article III. However, that very same Constitution puts limits on the reach of the federal courts. One of those limits is that the Constitution defines processes through which the President can be removed from office. The Constitution does not include a role for the Court in that process.
    Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by “We the People”–over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    DATED: October 29, 2009
    USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Benefactor
    To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast