American Military Unit Set to Impose Order in American Towns in Time for November Ele
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: American Military Unit Set to Impose Order in American Towns in Time for November Ele

  1. #1

    Exclamation American Military Unit Set to Impose Order in American Towns in Time for November Ele

    American Military Unit Set to Impose Order in American Towns in Time for November Elections

    Wake up sheeple it is later than you think. Pay close attention to the quotes at the end of the article by our founding fathers.

    American Military Unit Set to Impose Order in American Towns in Time for November Elections | Print | E-mail
    Written by Joe Wolverton, II
    Monday, 26 April 2010 15:20

    Within one month of the November midterm elections, a specially tasked unit of the United States Army will be on alert and ready to deploy within the borders of the United States to quell “civil unrest” that some fear may afflict the nation in the summer months prior to the elections.

    Predictably, advocates of the unlawful deployment of our military use fear to foment support this action. They call to mind the summer of 1968 when riots and demonstrations decrying the country’s prolonged conflict with Viet Nam plagued some of America’s large cities. The summer of 2010, they advert, could be “our long, hot summer of discontent.” In order to prevent that eerie specter from becoming reality, proponents encourage Americans to welcome the calming presence of armed American troops patrolling potential hotspots.

    The subordination of such an outfit, known as the Consequence Management Response Force (CCMRF), under the command of US Army Northern Command (NORTHCOM) was documented last year by this writer in The New American. Lest any suppose that such an overt act of tyranny be the product of our current President’s fertile fascist imagination, that account related how President Barack Obama was simply carrying out the historic reassignment implemented by President George W. Bush, who in 2008 claimed that as commander-in-chief, the President was authorized by the Constitution to use the armed forces as he saw fit, congressional opposition notwithstanding.

    In response to the Bush administration’s pronouncement, the Cato Institute published a warning of the dangers of using a brigade of the United States Army as a domestic police force. The Cato Institute article reported that the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team would be brought home from Iraq and combined with 15,000–20,000 other soldiers to form the new unit. NORTHCOM’s website claimed the size of the unit composed of servicemen from all branches of the military would not exceed 4,700 personnel.

    Typically, that estimate falls far below the actual number of regular army troops assigned to the force. According to reports, the CCMRF is composed of 80,000 troops and has been drilling at Fort Stewart, Georgia (home of the Army’s 3rd Infantry Division) since being redeployed from Iraq.

    The duration of the CCMRF’s domestic policing assignment is open ended. Army Colonel Louis Vogler, the chief of NORTHCOM future operations, told the Army Times, “Right now, the reponse force requirement will be an enduring mission. How the [Defense Department] chooses to source that and whether or not they continue to assign them to NORTHCOM, that could change in the future. Now, the plan is to assign a force every year.”

    Every year, year after year in perpetuity, the United States Army will place one of its brigades at the command of NORTHCOM, and by extension of the President, with the power to patrol and quell any flare ups of civil unrest, including “crowd control … or chaos.” With such vague marching orders, there is little wonder that many fear that such a force could be used to support a coup or enforce the executive branch’s will on any gathering deemed “unruly,” “dangerous,” or disruptive of the peace.

    In a frightening description of the unit’s training and mission directives, Colonel Roger Cloutier, commander of the 1st Brigade Combat Team, practically crows about the arsenal of tactical weapons that will be placed at the unit’s disposal. Colonel Cloutier asserts that his troops are training to use “the first ever nonlethal package” of weapons that will be used to “subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.”

    The “package” referred to by Cloutier includes spike strips to slow or stop traffic, bean bag bullets, tasers, shields, and batons.

    In apparent ignorance of the Posse Comitatus Act, which expressly forbids the armed deployment of federal troops within the borders of the United States, Colonel Cloutier muses that he “can’t think of a more noble mission than this. We’ve been all over the world during this time of conflict, but now our mission is to take care of citizens at home … and depending on where an event occurred, you’re going home to take care of your home town, your loved ones.”

    He continues in the same lofty spirit, “I don’t know what America’s overall plan is — I just know that 24 hours a day, seven days a week, there are soldiers, airmen and Marines that are standing by to come and help if they are called. It makes me feel good as an American to know that my country has a dedicated force to come in and help the people at home.”

    It is the very acme of irony that an active duty commander in the United States Army would use such language to exult in the absolutely illegal deployment of his unit as a police force endowed with lethal law-enforcement power within the “home towns” of America. The United States already has a force dedicated to help the American people; as a matter of fact it has thousands of such forces. They are known as the police and they are already lawfully and loyally serving the public good in every small town and sprawling metropolis from coast to coast and border to border.

    Finally, the citizens of this Republic, the palladium of liberty, must understand the staunch, unwavering opposition of our Founding Fathers to the use of the national armed forces in response to domestic civil unrest. Their words and warnings could be no clearer. From Sir William Blackstone (whose Commentaries on the Laws of England were of unparalleled influence on the Framers) to Thomas Jefferson; from Patrick Henry to James Madison; our learned forbears were unanimously aligned against any use of “standing armies” inside the borders of this nation.

    Here is but a sampling of their statements, which should serve as testimony against the deployment of any unit of any branch of the United States Armed Forces with the ostensible mission of imposing order in the towns and cities of this nation.

    Henry St. George Tucker in Blackstone’s Commentaries: “Wherever standing armies are kept up, and when the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.”

    Patrick Henry of Virginia: “A standing army we shall have, also, to execute the execrable commands of tyranny; and how are you to punish them? Will you order them to be punished? Who shall obey these orders? Will your mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined regiment?”

    The Virginia Ratifying Convention of 1788: “That standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, and therefore ought to be avoided, as far as the circumstances and protection of the community will admit; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power."

    The Pennsylvania Ratifying Convention: “As standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military shall be kept under strict subordination to and be governed by the civil power.”

    North Carolina’s Declaration of Rights of 1776: “That the people have a Right to bear Arms for the Defence of the State, and as Standing Armies in Time of Peace are dangerous to Liberty, they ought not to be kept up, and that the military should be kept under strict Subordination to, and governed by the Civil Power.”
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  2.   
  3. #2
    IMO, Obama, as the current Commander-in-Chief, would NOT hesitate to ignore the Posse Comitatus Act...he's pretty much ignored everything else that our Founders put into place when they established our Constitutional Republic. I believe that he wants absolute power and will do anything to get it!

    Buckle "down", Patriots. It's going to be a bumpy ride!
    Conservative Wife & Mom -- I'm a Conservative Christian-American with dual citizenship...the Kingdom of God is my 1st home and the U.S.A. is my 2nd.

  4. #3
    Not only would he not hesitate to use it, I believe he would relish in doing so as part of his plan to do as much damage to America as possible before he is either voted out of office or removed by other means. This man is dangerous and needs to
    be taken extremely seriously. As we've already seen, the Constitution means nothing to him so I think that it is prudent to
    assume the worse possible decision for America would be the one(s) he would choose.
    Setting aside the colonel's remarks and apparent attitude, I still have faith in our military and it's mission to protect America
    and Americans. They may be our last best hope for salvaging our country. Keep the faith!
    Kill them all and let God sort them out!

  5. #4
    mojo Guest
    IMO he is stetting the stage, not waiting for it to just happen. Just recently he made a very racist comment that the msm seems to not be able to report. as President he should be reminding all Americans to go to the poles, vote, let your voices be heard......instead, this man says, I want all blacks and latinos to go to the polls and stop their (republicans) allys from stopping us from changing America. seems he left out whites, asians, american indians.........hmmmmm

  6. Friends, I've been reading stories like this for a couple weeks now. Somewhere, someone got their information wrong and the misinformation has been spreading far and wide.

    It's true that 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division was the initial brigade to serve in the year-long Joint Task Force Civil Support mission under NORTHCOM, but they have long since passed that mission on to someone else. If you are using the Army Times article by Gina Cavallero as your source, that article was written over a year ago. 1/3 ID gave up that mission in OCT 2009 so they could prepare for their current deployment to Iraq, where they are today--and where they will remain throughout the year. They will not be returning to the US for any "pre-elections" mission.

    I appreciate your vigilant overwatch of our liberties, but in this case I believe your efforts are focused in the wrong direction. Please research your sources fully to ensure we are sharing the most accurate information on this, and other blog sites.

    Respectfully, MAJ Jeff Allen, 3rd Inf. Div, Public Affairs Officer

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The High Country
    Posts
    1,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Dogface View Post
    I appreciate your vigilant overwatch of our liberties, but in this case I believe your efforts are focused in the wrong direction. Please research your sources fully to ensure we are sharing the most accurate information on this, and other blog sites.

    Respectfully, MAJ Jeff Allen, 3rd Inf. Div, Public Affairs Officer
    Unfortunately Major, that approach does not support the FUD approach to political pot stirring.

    But speaking for myself and many more moderate members of this site I'm sure, I do thank you sir, for offering facts to shed light on these often deliberately clouded issues.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    1,225
    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative Wife & Mom View Post
    IMO, Obama, as the current Commander-in-Chief, would NOT hesitate to ignore the Posse Comitatus Act...he's pretty much ignored everything else that our Founders put into place when they established our Constitutional Republic. I believe that he wants absolute power and will do anything to get it!

    Buckle "down", Patriots. It's going to be a bumpy ride!
    +1!! Evidence of this can be found in the passage of the so called "obamacare" health care reform. It has less to do with health care and more to do with control! This is the biggest power grap by the most tryrannical administration in US history!! The winds of war are blowing!!



    You are ALL my children now.... BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Dogface View Post
    Friends, I've been reading stories like this for a couple weeks now. Somewhere, someone got their information wrong and the misinformation has been spreading far and wide.

    It's true that 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division was the initial brigade to serve in the year-long Joint Task Force Civil Support mission under NORTHCOM, but they have long since passed that mission on to someone else. If you are using the Army Times article by Gina Cavallero as your source, that article was written over a year ago. 1/3 ID gave up that mission in OCT 2009 so they could prepare for their current deployment to Iraq, where they are today--and where they will remain throughout the year. They will not be returning to the US for any "pre-elections" mission.

    I appreciate your vigilant overwatch of our liberties, but in this case I believe your efforts are focused in the wrong direction. Please research your sources fully to ensure we are sharing the most accurate information on this, and other blog sites.

    Respectfully, MAJ Jeff Allen, 3rd Inf. Div, Public Affairs Officer
    So, who picked up their mission?

    Consequence Management Reaction Force (CCMRF) sound familiar?

    How about the Patriot Act?

    What continued efforts does the Army (Or Obama & Company) have planned for the future?...

    The CCMRF sourcing in FY10 presents a different challenge. The global demand for Army Brigade Combat Teams, and the shift of forces to Operation Enduring Freedom, has driven the Army to a more tailored sourcing plan for the CCMRFs in FY10. The Army will establish maneuver enhanced brigades (MEBs) from the Active Component and the Army National Guard to provide the robust command and control capabilities in the CCMRFs. The CCMRF fits this organization's mission well, and using MEBs helps restore both strategic depth and balance to the Army...
    An opportunity for violation(s)/Repeal of Posse Comitatus waiting to happen...
    2009 U.S. Army Posture Statement

    Whether you are actually MAJ Jeff Allen (with numerous apparently politically motivated posts all over the internet...) or not then you are being intellectually dishonest by only mentioning that the 1st BCT is no longer performing that mission (since they were the first publicly acknowledged unit to perform that exercise/duty on a rotation basis)...
    When in fact said mission is a current MOS
    http://www.army.mil/publications/sol...utureForce.pdf

    Notwithstanding, current implementation of Operation Garden Plot, Yard Farming, et.al.

    http://www.usacarry.com/forums/polit...civil-war.html

    Illinois Violates Posse Comitatus Act - National Guard Headed To Chicago...
    FOXNews.com - Chicago Lawmakers: Call In the National Guard

    "The people never give up their liberties, but under some delusion." - Edmund Burke

Similar Threads

  1. Obama Orders 1 Million US Troops to Prepare for Civil War
    By Bohemian in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 148
    Last Post: 04-21-2010, 10:09 AM
  2. Bush Weighed Using Military in Arrests
    By HK4U in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 02:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast