About this U.N. small arms treaty - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: About this U.N. small arms treaty

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,556
    works for me!

  2.   
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by ronwill View Post
    Again what has to be remembered here is that SCOTUS has made several decisions stating no international treaty could be made that would limit or remove Constitutionally protected rights on American soil. Another thing to remember is that the treaty must be ratified by a 2/3 vote of the Senate. Even now the chance of that is slim to none.
    Let me remind you one more time there will be two justice sitting on the bench of the highest court in the land One has been recorded by saying the courts are a way of making new legislation. The other one has no exprince in being a judge what so ever. They are mirror images of obama they will not rule against the man who place them in their seat. And who will stop them from ruling for obama?

  4. #13
    Hopefully these voices of Constitutional conservatism will be heard and seen in November!

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by father-of-three View Post
    Hopefully these voices of Constitutional conservatism will be heard and seen in November!
    I don't think it will matter in November with a liberal high court in control of what is and isn't Constitutional. They will judge by their liberal interpetation

  6. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by bigrebnc1861 View Post
    I don't think it will matter in November with a liberal high court in control of what is and isn't Constitutional. They will judge by their liberal interpetation
    I was taking the mindset that you fight the battles that you are able to fight. Short of some smoking gun information, Kagan will be the next Justice. Recent votes and elections have set that in motion.
    November is the opportunity for the Senate NOT to get a two-thirds majority, to then prevent the approval of things like an international small arms treaty with vague emotional language. The word "Illicit" may get my vote for the most ambiguous word of the decade.

    We will have to see how outraged people still are in November when a certain bill was passed by a simple majority, when promises were previously made to do otherwise.

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by father-of-three View Post
    I was taking the mindset that you fight the battles that you are able to fight. Short of some smoking gun information, Kagan will be the next Justice. Recent votes and elections have set that in motion.
    November is the opportunity for the Senate NOT to get a two-thirds majority, to then prevent the approval of things like an international small arms treaty with vague emotional language. The word "Illicit" may get my vote for the most ambiguous word of the decade.

    We will have to see how outraged people still are in November when a certain bill was passed by a simple majority, when promises were previously made to do otherwise.
    I have no doubt that kagan will be approved that subject isn't up for debate in my book. But who do you go to when SCOTUS ruling that you know is un-Constitutional? The U.N.?

  8. #17
    In that circumstance, nobody. That is a depressing outcome I hope never comes to pass.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Posts
    1,088
    Quote Originally Posted by father-of-three View Post
    In that circumstance, nobody. That is a depressing outcome I hope never comes to pass.
    I agree but with all that has happen since obama election I would not be surprised.

  10. #19
    It seems like you are arguing down every comment I made. I'm not sure why, but I will find a thread topic elsewhere to read and possibly comment on.
    Have a nice day.

  11. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Safety Harbor, Florida since 2006 Waterloo, New York before 2006.
    Posts
    58

    Liberals at it again.................

    - while you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.



    OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT

    AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR


    On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a

    Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States


    On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.


    Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!

    THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.

    As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here


    Click on the link below for further acknowledgement…..

    U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade | Reuters





Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Sample Letter for Senators Regarding UN Small Arms Treaty of 2012
    By Tea For One in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-12-2010, 09:12 PM
  2. Firearms Refresher
    By Retired Grunt in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2010, 06:27 PM
  3. U.S./H. Clinton Agree to Timetable for U.N. Gun Ban?
    By Tea For One in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-17-2010, 11:28 PM
  4. Obama/ Clinton Agree To U.N. International Small Arms Ban
    By ronwill in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-18-2009, 08:43 AM
  5. Boxer Seeks to Ratify U.N. Treaty
    By HK4U in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 02:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast