Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice in Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice in Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Exclamation Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice in Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law

    This is unconstitutional. Foreign countries have no say in US law. This is part of that International law(global molly coddling) BS that we were warned about. The judge that is allowing this is a judicial activist and should be brought up on charges for what is allowing to happen. Write your congressman and get the ball rolling to remove this judge from his federal appointment ASAP. He clearly does not have the best interests of the United States, it's people or the constitution in mind!!!!!!!!!!!

    Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice in Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law
    FOXNews.com - Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice in Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law
    Published July 01, 2010

    | FoxNews.com

    Mexico gets to have a say in one of the lawsuits challenging Arizona's immigration enforcement law.

    A federal judge on Thursday granted Mexico's request to be allowed to file a legal brief supporting the challenge. That means the judge will consider the brief Mexico submitted previously.

    Mexico says it wants to defend its citizens' rights and that the law would lead to racial profiling and hinder trade and tourism. It also says the law would hinder work against drug trafficking and related violence.

    Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the law on April 23 and changes to it on April 30, has lawyers defending it in court.

    In a statement issued last week, Brewer said she was "very disappointed" to learn of Mexico's filing and reiterated that "Arizona's immigration enforcement laws are both reasonable and constitutional."

    "I believe that Arizona will ultimately prevail and that our laws will be found constitutional," Brewer added.

    Brewer and other supporters of the bill say the law is intended to pressure illegal immigrants to leave the United States. They contend it is a needed response to federal inaction over what they say is a porous border and social problems caused by illegal immigration. They also argue that it has protections against racial profiling.

    The law's provisions include a requirement that police enforcing another law ask people about their immigration status if there's a "reasonable suspicion" they're in the country illegally.

    The law takes effect July 29 unless blocked by a court.

    Until recently, Mexican law made illegal immigration a criminal offense -- anyone arrested for the violation could be fined, imprisoned for up to two years and deported. Mexican lawmakers changed that in 2008 to make illegal immigration a civil violation like it is in the United States, but their law still reads an awful lot like Arizona's.

    Arizona's policy, which President Felipe Calderon derided during a recent U.S. trip as "discriminatory," states police can't randomly stop people and demand papers, and the law prohibits racial profiling.

    Mexican law, however, requires law enforcement officials "to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country before attending to any issues."

    Amnesty International recently issued a report claiming illegal immigrants in Mexico -- typically from Central America -- face abuse, rape and kidnappings, and that Mexican police do little to stop it. When illegal immigration was a criminal offense in Mexico, officials were known to seek bribes from suspects to keep them out of jail.

    But Mexico said it has a legitimate interest in defending its citizens' rights and that Arizona's law would lead to racial profiling, hinder trade and tourism, and strain the countries' work on combating drug trafficking and related violence.
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

  2.   
  3. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by festus View Post
    ... The judge that is allowing this is a judicial activist and should be brought up on charges for what is allowing to happen...
    Impeachment would be an appropriate response to a decision such as this by a judge.
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

  4. #3
    Just one more example among many that the patients are indeed in charge of the asylum.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  5. #4
    We won't know for sure until the final analysis, but this is taking on the appearance of another case of a "judge" trying to
    legislate from the bench. It's not that the judges have too much power, it's the fact that they have been getting away
    with making rulings that they are not allowed to make. They can not change or make the law, they are there to uphold the
    laws that are on the books. This is going to be true in the Supreme Court too in the coming years, especially if Kagan is
    confirmed. Their job is to decide if cases are constitutional, not if they are popular or politically correct or even meet one's
    own individual agenda. Our judicial system needs to be strongly reminded what their function is in our government, and it's
    definitely not legislating from the bench. In all cases, that is up to the legislative branches of Federal and State governments by elected officials who answer to WE THE PEOPLE.
    Kill them all and let God sort them out!

  6. #5
    Not a day goes by without another assault on the Constitution of the United States of America. Now is the time for all good men (and women) to come to the aid of their country!!!
    Conservative Wife & Mom -- I'm a Conservative Christian-American with dual citizenship...the Kingdom of God is my 1st home and the U.S.A. is my 2nd.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    27
    What!

    Is it gonna take another revolution to set things straight again.

    Dang, did I just say that out loud.

  8. #7
    mojo Guest
    Just a blatant violation of the Constitution.........but this is the Boy Kings' administration. bow down!!!
    SICKENING........and yes you did just say that out loud Gun totn......good to hear there are some on the right page!

  9. #8
    But Mexico said it has a legitimate interest in defending its citizens' rights. GOOD IT CAN DEFEND THEM IN MEXICO. Arizona's law would lead to racial profiling. AND THE LAW WOULD FIND OUT WHO WAS IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY. hinder trade and tourism. THE TRADE OF DRUGS AND THE TOUR THROUGH THE DESERT AT NIGHT. and strain the countries' work on combating drug trafficking and related violence. COVER TALK FOR (WE DON'T WANT ANY COMPETITION FROM RIVAL GANGS ALREADY IN THE U.S. AND WE DON'T WANT OUR DRUG RUNNERS TO BE HARASSED DURING THEIR APPOINTED ROUNDS.)

  10. #9
    The illegals from Mexico, whether drug cartel members or not, are funneling millions of our U.S. dollars into their country. It's not hard to figure out why the Mexican government doesn't want that influx OF CASH to stop...it's propping up their economy while our's flounders!
    Conservative Wife & Mom -- I'm a Conservative Christian-American with dual citizenship...the Kingdom of God is my 1st home and the U.S.A. is my 2nd.

  11. #10
    mojo Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Conservative Wife & Mom View Post
    The illegals from Mexico, whether drug cartel members or not, are funneling millions of our U.S. dollars into their country. It's not hard to figure out why the Mexican government doesn't want that influx OF CASH to stop...it's propping up their economy while our's flounders!
    +1...........excellant point CW&M

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The question everyone's whispering about Kagan
    By rocknrod in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 03:45 PM
  2. Mayors Now Want World Court to Take On Evil U.S. Gun Dealers
    By Conservative Wife & Mom in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-11-2010, 11:13 AM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-16-2009, 10:05 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 10:09 AM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-10-2008, 12:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast