South Carolina Hang Your Heads In Shame - RINO Lindsey Graham Sells You Out Again !!!
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: South Carolina Hang Your Heads In Shame - RINO Lindsey Graham Sells You Out Again !!!

  1. #1

    South Carolina Hang Your Heads In Shame - RINO Lindsey Graham Sells You Out Again !!!




    Fresh Ink: S.C. GOP, Hang your heads in shame!
    As the only Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee to support the nomination of Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, liberal Sen. Lindsay Graham has earned himself a new position in the annals of RINO history. I don't know how much you can take of this video but try to watch if, especially if you are from South Carolina.

    Read more at GOPUSA...


    YouTube - Lindsay Graham on Kagan

    http://www.usacarry.com/forums/polit...ham-again.html

    "The people never give up their liberties, but under some delusion." - Edmund Burke

  2.   
  3. Isnt Lindsay a.... oh nevermind

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gray Court, SC
    Posts
    2,934
    Bohemian, tell us something we didn't know! GOPUSA needs to get their facts right. We would have gotten rid of him two years ago if someone had run against him in the Primary! He ended up running against Bob Conley (D) in the 2008 General Election. Someone better run against him in 2012. I'm tired of this idiot!
    USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Benefactor
    To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Hat View Post
    Bohemian, tell us something we didn't know! GOPUSA needs to get their facts right. We would have gotten rid of him two years ago if someone had run against him in the Primary! He ended up running against Bob Conley (D) in the 2008 General Election. Someone better run against him in 2012. I'm tired of this idiot!
    I just want to make sure nobody forgets come 2012, the next opportunity you guys have to bag him...

    Two Lindsey Graham quotes that just bug the living stuffing out of me...

    "I want a Republican that can attract Democrats." and ...
    (The) Tea Party will "Die Out"
    Lindsey Graham: Tea Party will "Die Out" - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

    "The people never give up their liberties, but under some delusion." - Edmund Burke

  6. #5
    Kagan Sails Through Senate Judiciary Hearings
    -- Contact your Senators before the full Senate votes

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://gunowners.org


    Tuesday, July 20, 2010


    The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to send the nomination of Elena Kagan to the full Senate floor today.

    The 13-6 vote was not a surprise. Democrats outnumber Republicans 12-7 on the committee, and their ranks include the anti-gun extreme wing of their party, such as Charles Schumer, Dianne Feinstein and **** Durbin.

    Six Republicans opposed Kagan, with only turncoat (RINO) Lindsey Graham of South Carolina voting to confirm the anti-gunner.

    As this important battle moves to the Senate floor, it is important to keep the heat on all Senators -- especially Democrats coming from rural states who claim to support the Second Amendment.

    If a handful of these Senators vote NO on Kagan, her confirmation could be defeated.

    While Kagan does not have a record of judicial opinions, her views on the Second Amendment are no mystery. Some things that have come to light since her nomination include:

    * While serving in the Clinton administration, Kagan drafted an executive order to ban certain semi-automatic firearms;

    * As a law clerk, she advised against the Supreme Court considering Sandidge v. United States in a case that questioned the constitutionality of the D.C. gun ban, writing that she was "not sympathetic" to the gun owner's Second Amendment claims; and

    * Kagan was also part of the Clinton team that pushed the firearms industry to include gun locks with all gun purchases and was in the Clinton administration when the President pushed legislation that would close down gun shows.

    During her hearings, Kagan ducked and dodged questions about the Second Amendment, and she refused to declare whether she believes the Second Amendment protects an individual right.

    Kagan insisted that the Supreme Court decisions in Heller and McDonald are precedent and "settled law," but this in no way precludes her from ruling that almost any gun law -- including gun owner registration, purchasing limits, waiting periods, private sale background checks, and more -- are consistent with the Constitution.

    Recall the confirmation hearings of Sonia Sotomayor, the newest Supreme Court Justice. Sotomayor assured the Senate, and the American people, that she accepted the Court's ruling in Heller that the Second Amendment protects an individual right.

    Yet, in the McDonald case, Sotomayor joined the dissent in writing that "I can find nothing in the Second Amendment's text, history, or underlying rationale that could warrant characterizing it as 'fundamental' insofar as it seeks to protect the keeping and bearing of arms for private self-defense purposes."

    Now Kagan has made the same promises to the Senate, but the available evidence portrays her as a forceful advocate of restrictive gun laws and driven by political considerations rather than the rule of law.

    As GOA attorney William J. Olson, who testified at the hearings, noted: "If [Kagan] were to go on the Court, with what we know about her now, she could be the most anti-gun justice on that Court."

    There is NO WAY any Senator who claims to support the Second Amendment could vote to confirm anti-gun radical Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court of the United States!

    ACTION: Please urge your two Senators to oppose the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the pre-written e-mail message below.

    ----- Pre-written letter -----

    Dear Senator:

    I stand with Gun Owners of America in opposing the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    While Kagan does not have a record of judicial opinions, her views on the Second Amendment are no mystery. Some things that have come to light since her nomination include:

    * While serving in the Clinton administration, Kagan drafted an executive order to ban certain semi-automatic firearms;

    * As a law clerk, she advised against the Supreme Court considering Sandidge v. United States in a case that questioned the constitutionality of the D.C. gun ban, writing that she was "not sympathetic" to the gun owner's Second Amendment claims; and

    * Kagan was also part of the Clinton team that pushed the firearms industry to include gun locks with all gun purchases and was in the Clinton administration when the President pushed legislation that would close down gun shows.

    During her hearings, Kagan ducked and dodged questions about the Second Amendment, and she refused to declare whether she believes the Second Amendment protects an individual right.

    Kagan insisted that the Supreme Court decisions in Heller and McDonald are precedent and "settled law," but this in no way precludes her from ruling that almost any gun law -- including gun owner registration, purchasing limits, waiting periods, private sale background checks, and more -- are consistent with the Constitution.

    There is NO WAY any Senator who claims to support the Second Amendment could vote to confirm anti-gun radical Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court of the United States!

    Please vote NO on the nominee's confirmation.

    Sincerely,
    your name here

    "The people never give up their liberties, but under some delusion." - Edmund Burke

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bonneau & Goose Creek, SC
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by Red Hat View Post
    Bohemian, tell us something we didn't know! GOPUSA needs to get their facts right. We would have gotten rid of him two years ago if someone had run against him in the Primary! He ended up running against Bob Conley (D) in the 2008 General Election. Someone better run against him in 2012. I'm tired of this idiot!
    I don't think that will be a problem...There will be a lot of people vying for that spot.

  8. #7
    mojo Guest
    what the hell is wrong with this guy.........the liberals must be slipping the kool-aide into his morning coffee. I pray he gets ousted in 2012, too bad it isnt this year.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bonneau & Goose Creek, SC
    Posts
    441
    Can we impeach US Senators for failing to represent our state, dereliction of duty?

  10. #9
    Both parties have traitors in them. Sometimes it is hard to tell the parties apart.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  11. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by melloyello View Post
    Can we impeach US Senators for failing to represent our state, dereliction of duty?
    U.S.C. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 § 1001.
    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, WHOEVER, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
    (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by ANY trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
    (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
    (3) makes or USES any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
    (b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party's counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
    (c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
    (1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
    (2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.

    "The people never give up their liberties, but under some delusion." - Edmund Burke

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Criminologist: Kagan a Threat to 2nd Amendment
    By festus in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-06-2010, 02:07 PM
  2. Gun Rights in South Africa
    By utimmer43 in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-21-2010, 08:44 PM
  3. RINO Senator Lindsey Graham Is At It Again...
    By Bohemian in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-26-2010, 06:26 PM
  4. Sen. Lindsey Graham censured, again
    By Red Hat in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-09-2010, 09:01 AM
  5. Lindsey Graham announces support for anti-gun Sotomayor
    By Red Hat in forum Politics and News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-25-2009, 02:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast