The President's New Plan - Page 7
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 82

Thread: The President's New Plan

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Debray View Post
    WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama is vowing to use "whatever power this office holds" to safeguard the nation's children, raising the prospect that he will pursue policy changes to stem gun violence in the wake of an elementary school massacre.

    "Because what choice do we have?" a somber Obama said at a Sunday evening vigil in the grieving community of Newtown, Conn. "We can't accept events like this as routine. Are we really prepared to say that we're powerless in the face of such carnage? That the politics are too hard?"

    The newly re-elected president offered few specifics about how he planned to proceed, saying only that he will engage with law enforcement, mental health professionals, parents and educators in the coming weeks. Just days after the shooting at an elementary school, Obama is already facing pressure from fellow Democrats and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to tackle gun control legislation, a contentious issue he avoided as he sought a second term.

    I really don't think this is his plan do you?


    Attachment 8126
    Obama has finally showed his true colors. He is an opportunist shallow photo-op seeking SOB. His agenda has always been gun control as has Clinton's. They will use the current rash of whack jobs to say it's not the lunatics it's the guns. How 'bout it's the proximity to 12/21/12 and the tinfoil hat crowd is losing it? There is nowhere to put the mentally ill anymore, the bulk of the mental hospitals have been closed to "save money". What did they think would happen? Treat the cause not the symptom.
    _________________

  2.   
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    Smart meters, Gun control, Health care, Sharia, and Freedom From Religion?

    In our area of Ohio there is an army of American Electric Power Co. contractors from all over the country replacing our electric meters with smart meters.

    Some are resisting this is a string of e-mails from one of our Steubenville For Liberty members and myself.

    What are your thought on the issue?



    Well Everyone,

    Today is the day, between 9am and noon that the AEP/ Ohio is bringing "law enforcement"
    (I presume the sheriff), to force us against our civil rights, against a signed medical waiver, to force us by more coercion, and install a "Smart Meter" on our home. When we again refuse to allow it because it violates our rights due to documented health reasons, and violation of our First Amendment, they threatened to turn off our power to our home.
    We have a three year baby with bronchitis getting breathing treatments, it's a few days before Christmas , but that's what they will do . Since we have a very large credit on our AEP account, we have been chosen for a special AMI Smart Meter which collects all the personal mined data from houses in our neighborhood, increasing the radiation amount which will penetrate our walls.
    I have called Governor Kasich,State Senator Lou Gentile,Rep.Bill Johnson, the PUCO (multiple calls),News 9 all Refuse to help in any way.
    If you do not know about the Smart Meters role in the UN Agenda 21 so called. "Sustainable Development " please google it.
    Marxism is Marching on, this is Obamas new world order- this is tyranny!
    Resist At Every Turn, at all cost.


    Stay Well,
    Toni
    ***************

    Toni,

    I'm sorry I didn't get to read your e-mail until this morning is there an update?

    Is there anything we can do?

    Have you contacted the Herald Star?

    Chuck

    ****************
    Hi Chuck,


    Yes, they came yesterday at 9am, where ready to install a smart meter, we had our video cam, and little Jimmy with his face smashed up against the window, and they backed down! For now. I told them as soon as they came on our porch that if they were going to disconnect our electric because of my refusal of the Smart Meter, to go ahead and do that and please leave, because our health and Constitutional Rights are not negotiable.
    They said that they would be sent back at some point. Thank You St. Michael!
    Thanks for asking.
    Merry Christmas, stay safe!


    Toni

    ************

    Good Morning Toni,

    For now that is good news.

    The Government will soon have complete control of our health, our wealth, our reproduction, our energy, our religion, and little by little our 2nd. Amendment ability to protect ourselves.

    Soon we can be turned on or off at the will of Government in more ways than one.

    Maybe the Amish had the right idea when they tried to distance themselves from Electric and the Government. Of course that didn't stop the Government from putting them in prison for cutting hair. Only to prove the power of Government under the new politically correct "hate crime" legislation has no boundaries.

    On the other hand our Government under the leadership of Barack Hussein Obama didn't hesitate to uphold Sharia law when they arrested Nakoula Basseley for insulting Muhammad.

    While we are still able to say it, "May God Bless and Merry Christmas" to You, Charlie, and little Jimmy.

    Chuck
    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

  4. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    Debt Ceiling Here we go again

    Here we go again.

    On March 27, congressional approval will be needed to keep the government running.

    The Republicans will figure a way kick the can and Obama will lead them by the nose.

    Obama already said he's willing to consider spending cuts separately but won't bargain over the government's borrowing authority, in other words forget your deals Boys just give some more money to waste.

    Obama also said "One thing I will not compromise over is whether or not Congress should pay the tab for a bill they've already racked up,"

    Where does he get this " they've " stuff?

    The Obama Socialist administration has all it's ducks in a row.

    Nancy Pelosi had the same talking points Sunday in insisting the two issues - raising the debt ceiling and reducing spending - shouldn't be coupled.



    She said, "Right now we have to pay the bills that have been incurred," just like we had to pass the health care bill to see what is in it. "And if you want to say cut spending for what we do next, fine, but don't tie it to the debt ceiling."

    **** Durbin said, We haven't taxed enough " Trust me, there are plenty of things within that tax code - these loopholes where people can park their money in some island offshore and not pay taxes. These are things that need to be closed. We can do that and use the money to reduce the deficit,"

    Ya right I'll trust him along with the rest of them.

    When are they going to understand they have already stolen over 60% to 70% of Job Makers Income with Income Tax, Property Tax, Sales Tax, State Tax, City Tax, License Fees, OSHA fines, EPA Regulations, Union Benefits, and only God knows how many other ways.

    Now the new fiscal cliff bill has raised the Income tax to 39.6% for all the Job Makers and the money they have left and by the way (and have already paid income tax on) if they place it in stocks or other investments they get to hand the Government another 20% of any gains.

    After they work all their life when they die instead of the estate going to their children and grandchildren the Federal Government will now take 40% and don't forget the State will get their cut.

    We are to the point there is no difference between the two parties.

    How many people have just given up, because there is difference between the two parties, it's time for a third party.

    The American Constitution Party is an option.

    Home

    Chuck

    And by the way

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President. (H.J.Res. 15) - GovTrack.us


    H.J.Res. 15: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, ...
    thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
    Introduced:
    Jan 04, 2013 (113th Congress, 2013–2015)
    Sponsor:
    Rep. José Serrano [D-NY15]
    Status:
    Referred to Committee
    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

  5. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    We went through this before in 1776

    Our VP Wizard Biden said, the Socialist Administration President is weighing executive action in addition to recommending legislation by Congress.


    IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

    The unanimous Declaration of the United States of America

    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —

    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —

    That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

    It's Time

    American Constitution Party

    Home
    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    We are from the Government and we can do what we want

    Good Morning,

    And we thought it couldn't happen in America.



    Remember Barack Obama is a thug. In case you really don’t know what a "Community Organizer" is, at least as far as Democrats / Progessives go, they are mob enforcers. Groups like ACORN, where Obama used to work, and the purple shirted SEIU union leg breakers, are nothing more than thugs for hire. Now Obama has un-limited control of all the Thugs including Eric Holder's Non Justice Department, Homeland Security, The IRS, and the EPA and we pay the bills.
    What possibly could go wrong?

    Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure.12/15/1791.

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    He has already trashed the 1st. and 2nd.

    This makes 3 Out of 27 and counting.

    Bob Connors had a very good Letter to the Editor in the Herald Star Sunday Morning if you missed it here it is. Elected officials should stand tall - Steubenville, Wintersville, Toronto, Mingo, Weirton, Jefferson County | News, Sports, Jobs, HeraldStarOnline.com
    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    Obama put the Right guy in charge

    It has to right if Joe said it.

    "30 or 40 clips in a magazine is a lot"

    If you need 150 rounds and there is only 10 rounds in a magazine you will have to change that magazine 30 or 25 times.


    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

  8. #67
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SE FL and SE OH
    Posts
    5,668
    Quote Originally Posted by Debray View Post
    It has to right if Joe said it.

    "30 or 40 clips in a magazine is a lot"

    If you need 150 rounds and there is only 10 rounds in a magazine you will have to change that magazine 30 or 25 times.


    Good old uncle Joe. He should report to a FEMA camp for reeducation. Needs a refresher course in math.
    NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
    NRA Certified RSO
    Normal is an illusion. What is normal to the spider is chaos to the fly.

  9. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    The President Intends to Inflict Pain on the People

    I'm passing this on because we all ask ourselves what can we do.
    We all know this President has one plan, To turn America into a Socialist, Marxist, Communist Country.
    In order to complete his plan all he needs is control of Senate, Congress, and the Supreme Court.
    It is true, this president intends to use the pain of the American People to complete his political goals.
    He has been offered a way out and to foil his plan all we need to do is "Shout it from the Roof tops.
    2014 is a very important election.
    Just like the Benghazi attack this president don't hesitate to parade his lying subordinates in front of the American People
    and as Tom says below we need Congress to call their hand.

    Take Care
    Chuck

    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Tom Zawistowski
    To: Chuck White
    Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:05 PM
    Subject: Call to Action on Sequestration - PLEASE FORWARD ALL OVER THE COUNTRY


    Dear Chuck,


    I am writing about a most serious matter that all conservatives must act upon, starting Friday. As you may or may not know, today the Republicans in the Senate put forward a bill, a copy of which you will find below, that Amended the Sequestration Agreement to allow the President to be able to move money WITHIN Agencies. This would allow the President, through his Agency Heads, to make "intelligent cuts" as opposed to the "Across-the-Board Cuts" that the President and his lying subordinates have been screaming about for a month. Before the bill was up for a vote in the Senate, the President made it clear that he would veto the bill if it passed. Why? Because the President wants the Sequestration and wants the American people to suffer because of it, particularly in Republican House Districts. You see, the President is fighting the 2014 Election right now. By creating pain for citizens in Republican House Districts, he hopes to force vulnerable Republicans to retreat from Sequestration and agree to more tax cuts to stop the pain. This would give the left all the sound bites and headlines they would need to unseat these Republican House members in order to take over the House in 2014. This President intends to use the pain of the American people as a weapon to achieve his political goals.


    Obviously, we can not allow this to happen and the actions of the President and the Democratic Senate today provides the tools we can use to keep it from happening and even turning the tables on him. First, we all need to make an effort to call into talk radio stations and write Letters to the Editor starting Friday and continuing for the next two weeks at least. The message is simple. If anyone is getting hurt by these minor cuts in Federal spending, it is the fault of the President who was given the opportunity to make "intelligent cuts" but instead chose to make cuts that un-necessarily hurt people. Call the White House and tell the President that if he can not manage a 2% cut in spending then he needs to resign. Do NOT allow anyone to write into your paper or call a radio station and try to blame the Republicans without them being challenged.


    Second, please call all of our Congressmen and DEMAND that they start holding hearings NEXT week demanding to know why Eric Holder, Transportation Secretary LaHood, Education Secretary Arne Duncan and all the rest who were paraded out to knowingly lie to the American people about cuts in Sequestration and scare people about their safety. This is outrageous behavior and can not be allowed to go unchallenged. If any CEO in the private sector knowingly lied about the finances of their company on Television, they would be fired. Why would a civil society allow supposed "leaders" in our government to knowingly lie without demanding their resignations? These scare tactics they have employed are tantamount to yelling "FIRE" in a theater! Our national defense will be compromised, benefits will be cut, police and fire and teachers will be laid off, air traffic safety will be reduced, on and on and on. DEMAND hearings and make them defend their statements. This is the best way to make sure that the American people support the cuts in sequestration and hopefully the reform of Social Security and Medicare which must follow.


    Third, there are 20 Democratic Senators who are up for re-election in 2014 or that have open seats. (See list below) Many of them are in Red States and many of them are in states that Romney won by 5% or more. We need to make sure that voters in those states understand that these "do nothing" Senators have not passed a budget in five years, and having been given the chance today to vote to allow the President to make "intelligent cuts" under Sequestration, they did nothing again. They have done nothing to defend their constituents and any pain that is inflicted on the American people is their fault. We need to make sure our fellow citizens know where the blame really lies and if we do, we have a real chance of taking the Senate in 2014. Our goal is to get these Red State Democratic Senators to turn away from the President and denounce the un-necessary cuts that hurt people. If we can hold the House and win the Senate in 2014 our chance in 2016 go up dramatically and this long national nightmare may finally come to an end!


    Thank you for passing this on. This is the best opportunity for the Conservative Movement since 2010 and we need to make the most of it. These Sequestration "decreases in increased spending" are not good enough. We must have entitlement reform to get our Federal Spending under control. Let us seize the day and do everything we can to stop this President's socialist agenda right now!


    Best Regards,


    Tom Zawistowski
    Executive Director
    Portage County TEA Party


    DEMOCRATS
    Max Baucus (Montana)
    Mark Begich (Alaska)
    Chris Coons (Delaware)
    Richard Durbin (Illinois)
    Al Franken (Minnesota)
    Kay Hagan (North Carolina)
    Tom Harkin (Iowa)*
    Tim Johnson (South Dakota)
    John Kerry (Massachusetts)
    Mary Landrieu (Louisiana)
    Frank Lautenberg (New Jersey)
    Carl Levin (Michigan)
    Jeff Merkley (Oregon)
    Mark Pryor (Arkansas)
    Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
    John Rockefeller (West Virginia)*
    Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire)
    Mark Udall (Colorado)
    Tom Udall (New Mexico)
    Mark Warner (Virginia)




    S.16 -- To provide for a sequester replacement. (Placed on Calendar Senate - PCS)


    S 16 PCS


    Calendar No. 19

    113th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    S. 16
    To provide for a sequester replacement.


    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

    February 27, 2013
    Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar pursuant to the order of February 14, 2013, as modified on February 26, 2013


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    A BILL
    To provide for a sequester replacement.


    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SEQUESTER REPLACEMENT.

    (a) Definitions- In this section--

    (1) the terms `account', `budgetary resources', `discretionary appropriations', `direct spending' and related terms have the meaning given such terms in section 250 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985;

    (2) the term `joint resolution' means only a joint resolution the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: `That Congress disapproves the cancellation of budgetary resources identified in the qualifying sequester replacement plan submitted by the President onXXXXXX.' (the blank space being appropriately filled in); and

    (3) the term `qualifying sequester replacement plan' means a plan submitted by the President--

    (A) not later than March 15, 2013; and

    (B) that proposes to permanently cancel $85,333,000,000 of budgetary resources available for fiscal year 2013 from any discretionary appropriations or direct spending account, provided--

    (i) no more than $42,666,500,000 of budgetary resources shall be cancelled from defense spending (budget function 050);

    (ii) any cancellation of budgetary resources from budget function 050 shall be in compliance with the policies under and consistent with amounts authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239);

    (iii) the cancellation of budgetary resources may not be implemented through changes to programs or activities contained in the Internal Revenue Code, or increase governmental receipts, offsetting collections, or offsetting receipts;

    (iv) any cancellation of budgetary resources in an account that is not defense spending may not be offset against an increase in another such account; and

    (v) the proposed cancellation of budgetary resources shall reduce outlays by not less than $82,500,000,000 by the end of fiscal year 2018.

    (b) Proposal- Not later than March 15, 2013, the President shall submit to Congress a qualifying sequester replacement plan.

    (c) Joint Resolution of Disapproval-

    (1) NO REFERRAL- A joint resolution shall not be referred to a committee in either House of Congress and shall immediately be placed on the calendar.

    (2) MOTION TO PROCEED- A motion to proceed to a joint resolution is highly privileged in the House of Representatives and is privileged in the Senate and is not debatable. The motion is not subject to a motion to postpone and all points of order against the motion are waived. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of a joint resolution is agreed to, the joint resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the respective House until disposed of.

    (3) EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES- In the House of Representatives, a joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against a joint resolution and against its consideration are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to its passage without intervening motion except 2 hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent. A motion to reconsider the vote on passage of the joint resolution shall not be in order.

    (4) EXPEDITED PROCEDURE IN SENATE-

    (A) CONSIDERATION- In the Senate, consideration of a joint resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 10 hours, which shall be divided equally between the majority and minority leaders or their designees. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. An amendment to, or a motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the joint resolution is not in order.

    (B) VOTE ON PASSAGE- If the Senate has proceeded to a joint resolution, the vote on passage of the joint resolution shall occur immediately following the conclusion of consideration of the joint resolution, and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the Senate.

    (C) RULINGS OF THE CHAIR ON PROCEDURE- Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate to the procedure relating to a joint resolution shall be decided without debate.

    (5) AMENDMENT NOT IN ORDER- A joint resolution considered under this subsection shall not be subject to amendment in either the House of Representatives or the Senate.

    (6) COORDINATION WITH ACTION BY OTHER HOUSE- If, before passing a joint resolution, one House receives from the other House a joint resolution--

    (A) the joint resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee; and

    (B) the procedure in the receiving House shall be the same as if no joint resolution had been received from the other House, except that the vote on final passage shall be on the joint resolution of the other House.

    (7) PERIOD- Subject to subsection (d)(1), Congress may not consider a joint resolution under this subsection after the date that is 7 calendar days after March 15, 2013.

    (8) RULES OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE- This subsection is enacted by Congress--

    (A) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively, and as such it is deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, but applicable only with respect to the procedure to be followed in that House in the case of a joint resolution, and it supersedes other rules only to the extent that it is inconsistent with such rules; and

    (B) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.

    (d) Consideration After Passage-

    (1) COMPUTATION OF DAYS- If Congress passes a joint resolution, the period beginning on the date the President is presented with the joint resolution and ending on the date the President signs, allows to become law without his signature, or vetoes and returns the joint resolution (but excluding days when either House is not in session) shall be disregarded in computing the calendar day period described in subsection (c)(7).

    (2) VETO OVERRIDE- Debate on a veto message in the House of Representatives and the Senate relating to a joint resolution shall be 1 hour equally divided between the majority and minority leaders or their designees.

    (e) Disapproval- If a joint resolution is enacted under this section--

    (1) the President may not carrying out the proposed cancellation of budgetary resources in the qualifying sequester replacement plan submitted under subsection (b); and

    (2) sequestration shall continue in accordance with the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.).

    (f) Failure to Enact Disapproval- Effective on the day after the end of the calendar day period under subsection (c)(7) (as determined in accordance with subsection (d)(1)), if the President has submitted a qualifying sequester replacement plan in accordance with subsection (b) and a joint resolution of disapproval has not been enacted under this section, the President shall--

    (1) cancel any sequestration order issued under section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a); and

    (2) cancel budgetary resources in accordance with the qualifying sequester replacement plan submitted under subsection (b).

    SEC. 2. TRANSFER AUTHORITY FOR FUNDING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNDER CONTINUING RESOLUTION AND SEQUESTER CONSISTENT WITH AMOUNTS AUTHORIZED BY NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013.

    (a) In General- For fiscal year 2013, in implementing sequestration under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the Secretary of Defense may transfer amounts appropriated for the Department of Defense by the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013 (Public Law 112-175) among accounts of the Department of Defense.

    (b) Transfers Consistent With Amounts Authorized by PL 112-239- In the event of any transfers under subsection (a), the total amount in any account of the Department of Defense that is available for obligation and expenditure in fiscal year 2013 shall be consistent with, and may not exceed, the amount authorized to be appropriated for that account for that fiscal year by applicable provisions of division A of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239).

    (c) Notice to Congress- Not later than 15 after any transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a description of the transfer, including the amount of the transfer and the accounts from and to which the funds will be transferred.

    (d) Transfer Authority- The transfer authority provided by subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided by law.

    (e) Definition- In this section, the term `congressional defense committees' has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
    Calendar No. 19


    113th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    S. 16

    A BILL
    To provide for a sequester replacement.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    February 27, 2013

    Read twice and placed on the calendar pursuant to the order of February 14, 2013, as modified on February 26, 2013
    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

  10. #69
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,348
    Blog Entries
    2
    To enact a socialist government, he would first have to do away with all religion. Not possible in the melting pot.

  11. #70
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ohio
    Posts
    766
    Blog Entries
    10

    Is the Plan comming together?

    According to former FBI agent Larry Grathwohl, who was assigned to infiltrate the Weather Underground’s Central Committee, the organization run by Bill Ayers carried out bombings targeting the Pentagon, the State Department, as well as police stations and federal buildings, in an attempt to cause the collapse of the United States and to open the door for foreign troops to occupy the country. (United Nations)

    Grathwohl stated that Ayers and his group planned to deal with Americans who would try to resist this takeover by “establishing re-education centers in the south-west”. Asked what he would do with those who still refused to convert to communism, Ayers said that they would have to be “eliminated,” as in 25 million Americans would be killed in concentration camps.

    Now Bill Ayers, the prominent domestic terrorist and Obama Mentor-turned educator of America’s youth, is back in the news speaking at New York University “Change the Stakes” meeting back in December. There, among other things, he said the left ( or is it the Communist) must utilize its “absolute access” to America’s schools to further its “movement.”

    I just received this from a friend, Maybe the plan is coming together?


    “Every step we take towards making the State our Caretaker of our lives, by that much we move toward making the State our Master.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast