D.C. Council Allows Residents to Begin Applying for Handgun Permits
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: D.C. Council Allows Residents to Begin Applying for Handgun Permits

  1. #1

    D.C. Council Allows Residents to Begin Applying for Handgun Permits

    This was on the Fox news site.

    FOXNews.com - D.C. Council Allows Residents to Begin Applying for Handgun Permits - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

    D.C. Council Allows Residents to Begin Applying for Handgun Permits
    Tuesday, July 15, 2008

    E-Mail Print Share:

    WASHINGTON The District of Columbia Council approved new firearms legislation Tuesday that will allow residents to begin applying for handgun permits this week.

    The council's unanimous vote comes as officials try to comply with last month's U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down the city's 32-year-old ban on handguns.

    The emergency legislation will allow handguns to be kept in the home if they are used only for self-defense and carry fewer than 12 rounds of ammunition.

    Handguns, as well as other legal firearms such as rifles and shotguns, also must be kept unloaded and disassembled, or equipped with trigger locks unless there is a "reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm" in the home.

    "This is not perfect legislation," said D.C. Council member Phil Mendelson, who worked with the mayor's office on the bill. "The first step is what we have before us today so that we maintain important provisions in our gun registration law while we continue look at how we can further refine our gun registration law."

    Gun rights groups, including the National Rifle Association, said at least some of the new regulations will likely be challenged.

    The emergency legislation will remain in effect for 90 days, and the council expects to begin work in September on permanent legislation.

    Though residents can begin applying for handgun permits this week, city officials have said the entire process could take weeks or months.

    "It depends on what your situation is whether you owned the gun before or purchased it outside the District of Columbia," police Chief Cathy Lanier said.

    The process involves a written exam, proof of residency and good vision. Successful applicants must pay a registration fee and agree to fingerprinting and a criminal background check before obtaining a weapon.

    Even with Tuesday's vote, Washington's gun regulations will remain among the strictest in the country, said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

    He said Chicago, where it is illegal to possess or sell handguns, now has the toughest ordinance, though the city is facing a legal challenge following the Supreme Court ruling.

    It remains to be seen how much of the district's new regulations will withstand constitutional challenges, Helmke said, adding that it could take years for the courts to sort it all out.

    The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision June 26 that affirmed the right to have guns for self-defense "raised more questions than it's probably answered," Helmke said. "They haven't explained where you draw the line."
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,675
    Nobody believed me when I first posted in the immediate aftermath of the Heller decision saying that D.C. would continue to have America's worst gun laws, and as this action by the D.C. council shows, I was right. Yes, the ruling was a victory (sort of) for law abiding D.C. residents, but I still don't see myself moving there voluntarily any time in the near (or distant, for that matter) future.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by tattedupboy View Post
    Nobody believed me when I first posted in the immediate aftermath of the Heller decision saying that D.C. would continue to have America's worst gun laws, and as this action by the D.C. council shows, I was right. Yes, the ruling was a victory (sort of) for law abiding D.C. residents, but I still don't see myself moving there voluntarily any time in the near (or distant, for that matter) future.
    I, for one, totally believed they'd kick, scream, drag their feet and do everything they could to avoid complying. What I'm looking forward to is a major smackdown on DC by the courts charged with enforcing the decision. Maybe, if DC plays their cards right, we can have incorporation, removal of buying out of state restrictions, and right to carry all defined before other cases can even be heard.

    Yeah, I know, I'm dreaming; but, for at least we now have real hope...
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast