What if obama admin. Isn’t lying about the scandals?
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: What if obama admin. Isn’t lying about the scandals?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sepra Peratus/Arkansas
    Posts
    1,638

    What if obama admin. Isn’t lying about the scandals?

    BECK: WHAT IF OBAMA ADMIN. ISN’T LYING ABOUT THE SCANDALS?

    May. 23, 2013 6:40pm Erica Ritz
    U.S. President Barack Obama speaks at the National Defense University May 23, 2013 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Getty Images)
    On his Thursday night television program, Glenn Beck took a different approach to the scandals currently facing the Obama administration: let’s take our leaders at their word.
    Few on the right believe the administration’s ever-changing stories regarding Benghazi, the IRS targeting conservatives, and the DOJ seizing the phone records of reporters. The struggle has been to elicit more information to fill in the gaps, or determine who was lying and when.
    But Beck said that tonight, for the sake of covering all the bases, we should analyze the ramifications of if the president and his top officials are actually telling the truth.
    Would it make you feel more, or less safe?
    “The mantra of this administration in the face of the scandals has been the same: We don’t know, we just don’t know,” Beck said, playing a montage of the president, Attorney General Eric Holder, and others.
    The only possible explanation if they are telling the truth, Beck said, is that President Obama is “completely disengaged and out of the loop.”
    “That would mean he is not in charge of what is happening in the agencies that answer to him. If that is true, are you comfortable with it?” he asked. “Why is he so uninformed and out of touch? How could he possibly effectively govern if he is that far removed? …If he is not the one being informed and updated and steering the ship, who is? Is there anyone?”
    Beck proceeded to analyze Benghazi, the DOJ seizing the records of reporters, and Operation Fast and Furious.

    “…And the president of the United States had no clue?” Beck said. “None? …If the president is not informed on national security threats like this, what else is he not being informed on? How can he give a speech [on counter-terrorism] like he did today? By his own admission, he’s not being brought into the loop.”
    After covering all the scandals in more detail, Beck summarized: “This is the scenario the administration wants you to believe, it’s just been condensed. It’s a scenario where, through their incompetence and indifference, Americans suffer and then when they find out about it, they vow to get to the bottom of it. But have they gotten to the bottom of any of these yet?”
    “If this is the story they want you to believe, it is so bad it begs one more question,” Beck concluded. “How bad is the truth?”
    <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/23/beck-what-if-obama-admin-isnt-lying-about-the-scandals/">http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...-the-scandals/

    ~Responsible people who understand that their personal protection is up to them, provide themselves with protection. Those that don't have only themselves to blame.~Proud NRA ~SAF~GoA Member~

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Battle Creek Michigan
    Posts
    1,269
    My initial thought was that, while I am convinced they are lying, it would be evern worse if they were, in factd, so stupid they didn't know what's going on.
    Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia...Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sepra Peratus/Arkansas
    Posts
    1,638
    I can't know for sure which is worse.
    ~Responsible people who understand that their personal protection is up to them, provide themselves with protection. Those that don't have only themselves to blame.~Proud NRA ~SAF~GoA Member~

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Creswell, Oregon
    Posts
    3,865
    In my opinion Obama has set the tone and surrounded himself with radicals that believe what he does. These department heads go about doing his bidding. It's not important to them that the president knows everything they are doing. Obama is to continue campaigning and they will go about taking care of business. If like Beck says, Obama is completely blind sided by these scandals, we are in super deep trouble.
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  6. #5
    Just ran across this today. Could be the reason for our problems:
    "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." H. L. Mencken
    Yep, he is there.

  7. #6

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldgrunt View Post
    Just ran across this today. Could be the reason for our problems:
    "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." H. L. Mencken
    Yep, he is there.
    Wish I could hit LIKE more times!!!!!!

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Goosetown in the Pintlers
    Posts
    417
    The United States is not a democracy ergo nothing to be perfected in that direction.
    ...SCOTUS says we're right...You don't like it. I'm sorry you don't like it. I guess that's a problem for you. Some people don't like gays. Some don't like alcohol. Some don't like meat. ~michaelzwilliamson

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,832
    If he truly is "out of the loop" and "uninformed" then we need to define another term: Ineptocracy

    a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
    ~ Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast