Ricin attack puts spotlight BACK on Bloomberg's gun control push - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Ricin attack puts spotlight BACK on Bloomberg's gun control push

  1. Quote Originally Posted by JohnD13 View Post
    A very "special" delivery isn't it? Given Bloomberg's past history, like sending "investigators" to other states to attempt straw purchases from gun shops, it's not to large a stretch of the imagination to see someone in the "MAIG" sending these sort of letters.
    That was the first thing I thought when I saw the story, what better way to portray gun owners as nuts.
    An informed gun owner is an anti-gunners worst nightmare, stay informed at the American Gun Owners Alliance

  2.   
  3. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by ianschrd View Post
    I heard on NPR that the first time the letter was tested it was negative for ricin. Why would they need to test it again?
    Hello, they didn't get the results they wanted to benefit their cause.
    ~
    Sooooo, you keep testing until you can get it right or at least make it look like it.
    ~
    Sooooo, you keep testing until you can get it right or al least make it look like it.
    ~
    Got it right now.
    I'd rather be a Conservative Nutjob. Than a Liberal with NO Nuts & NO Job

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Louisville Ky.
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by fuhr52 View Post
    You guys are so cynical. Obama promised the most transparent administration in American history. It's the republicans and Rush Limbaugh, along with Fox News, that keep making up things to make his administration look bad. This stuff wouldn't happen if he could just get the things he wants implemented. If we would all get our news only from the administration lap dog main stream media, Obama could finally save us all from ourselves.
    Yeah, what's wrong with us? If we would just do as Daddy O and Uncle Joe tells us we would be much better off! (yeah, sure)

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Elma NY
    Posts
    1,638
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior1256 View Post
    Yeah, what's wrong with us? If we would just do as Daddy O and Uncle Joe tells us we would be much better off! (yeah, sure)
    I know that we are whako right wing gun toting nut jobs, but I am willing to make a bet.

    I will bet a sack of White Castles that if some reporter had the balls and had access to the data he or she would be able to prove the following:

    The people targeted by the IRS and harassed because of their political beliefs were mostly in the so called red states. States like mine (the Unionized Soviet Socialist State of New York) had a lower amount of targeted harassment because we are a solid Obama state.
    States in play like PA Ohio etc had a higher amount of targets.
    WHY and HOW? The IRS Head that visited the White House 147 times was verbally receiving the target info. No Email, No Memo, NO TRACE!

    From Whom was he receiving info from?

    We are talking about a sack of White Castle sliders here baby.
    Any Takers?
    Tolerance of the intolerant leads to the destruction of tolerance. “You are also reminded that any inappropriate remarks or jokes concerning security may result in your arrest,” in the land of the free.

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    7,733
    Quote Originally Posted by golocx4 View Post
    I know that we are whako right wing gun toting nut jobs, but I am willing to make a bet.

    I will bet a sack of White Castles that if some reporter had the balls and had access to the data he or she would be able to prove the following:

    The people targeted by the IRS and harassed because of their political beliefs were mostly in the so called red states. States like mine (the Unionized Soviet Socialist State of New York) had a lower amount of targeted harassment because we are a solid Obama state.
    States in play like PA Ohio etc had a higher amount of targets.
    WHY and HOW? The IRS Head that visited the White House 147 times was verbally receiving the target info. No Email, No Memo, NO TRACE!

    From Whom was he receiving info from?

    We are talking about a sack of White Castle sliders here baby.
    Any Takers?
    Apparently this thing went all the way to Washington. Pro-Israel groups were referred to the Washington bureau for special review because their non-profit business could funnel $$ to terrorists. That was actually the directive as Mike Huckabee's guests uncovered last night. The kicker was that there was a directive to investigate anything that was not in-line with the presidents plans/direction. THAT, is where the crime is committed. Lois Lerner should be indicted.
    GOD, GUNS and GUITARS

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Louisville Ky.
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by golocx4 View Post
    I know that we are whako right wing gun toting nut jobs, but I am willing to make a bet.

    I will bet a sack of White Castles that if some reporter had the balls and had access to the data he or she would be able to prove the following:

    The people targeted by the IRS and harassed because of their political beliefs were mostly in the so called red states. States like mine (the Unionized Soviet Socialist State of New York) had a lower amount of targeted harassment because we are a solid Obama state.
    States in play like PA Ohio etc had a higher amount of targets.
    WHY and HOW? The IRS Head that visited the White House 147 times was verbally receiving the target info. No Email, No Memo, NO TRACE!

    From Whom was he receiving info from?

    We are talking about a sack of White Castle sliders here baby.
    Any Takers?
    No bet. I figure groups in my state were hit HARD.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast