A Test of Police Allegiance
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: A Test of Police Allegiance

  1. #1

    Angry A Test of Police Allegiance

    A Test of Police Allegiance

    Whom will you serve when the federal authority comes to town?
    Even local cops begin to question federal encroachment into their territory


    By Chuck Klein, May 30th, 2013

    Article Origin

    Here's a new twist on an old line: Two, fully decked-out SWAT members -- a local police officer and a federal agent -- are standing guard at a terrorist bombing site. As blue strobes probe, sirens yelp and armored vehicles rumble, one LEO says to the other, "Everyone in the world is the enemy, except you and me ... and sometimes I'm not so sure about you."

    America is made up of city, village, township, county "local" cops in addition to state troopers and investigators. Added to this protective guard is a growing mix of federal alphabet soupers, e.g., FBI, ATF, IRS, DHS, TSA, DEA, et al.

    Recently the Department of Homeland Security has been encroaching (is there a better word?) into local police jurisdictions. This was noted recently by the Western Center for Journalism that said: The DHS, plans to use their camera equipped drones for state-side activities beyond terrorism to something it calls public safety.

    Prior to the proliferation of civilian concealed carry, it used to be "us vs. them" meant carriers of the shield against all civilians. Obviously the shoot-a-cop-at-every-stop never happened. Now, it might not be as clear exactly who "them" is. A significant number of these decent, law-abiding citizens have become "prepers"-- not so much because they fear the end-of-times, but more that they fear their own government. In other words, if chaos reigns, they aren't sure who they can trust -- the military and federal agents or the cop on the beat.

    In the event of a real (or rogue government generated) catastrophic terrorist attack/communications gridlock, where will you be standing? Will you continue to serve and protect the citizens regardless of political, federal LE or military pressure?

    Many visionary county sheriffs have taken a very gutsy position of drawing a line-in-the-sand over unconstitutional gun controls. They realize national schemes to register firearms, under the guise of background checks and restricted small arms, is an acceleration of that proverbial slide down the slippery slope. All LEOs might do well to reflect upon with whom they will link arms if the descent continues -- or escalates.

    We, the local law enforcement community, must resolve to never surrender our intrinsic duty to protect our fellow Americans from all enemies -- foreign AND domestic. We owe a duty to our neighbors (the parents of the kids your kids go to school with) to reassure them of our commitment to serve and protect them from each and every adversary.
    Today, we're approaching a point of no return. When the military moves in, the commander won't be asking: "Chief/Sheriff/Superintendent, where do you want my troops?" He/she will mandate, "Turn in your firearms and go home, we're in charge." Are we, the city kitties and county mounties, to forsake our sworn and moral duties and become subservient?


    Suggestion
    : Create a board comprised of sergeant-and-below ranking representatives of local, state, federal and military LEOs plus civilian organizations such as NRA and Oath Keepers, to address issues from the perspective of the parents of the kids our kids go to school with.


    Chuck Klein is the author of INSTINCT COMBAT SHOOTING, Defensive Handgunning for Police and other books. He may be reached through his web site.

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arnoldsville, Ga
    Posts
    463
    Homeland security cops should not have any legal authority as they are an arm of the democratic party. I think if a case went to the supreme court it would be found they would be unconstitutional. Hitlers brown shirts comes to mind, then comes the gestapo.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    2,072
    Quote Originally Posted by foxytwo View Post
    Homeland security cops should not have any legal authority as they are an arm of the democratic party. I think if a case went to the supreme court it would be found they would be unconstitutional. Hitlers brown shirts comes to mind, then comes the gestapo.
    Don't bet on it. They allowed Obamacare.


    I used to be a government-educated stooge. By the grace of God, I repent. -Robert Burris

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SE FL and SE OH
    Posts
    5,667
    One day it will be an "us vs the gov't" situation. It won't go well for either side but I can only hope that the "us" side wins. The 2nd Amendment was written with that in mind.
    NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
    NRA Certified RSO
    Normal is an illusion. What is normal to the spider is chaos to the fly.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Louisville Ky.
    Posts
    1,043
    Quote Originally Posted by S&W645 View Post
    One day it will be an "us vs the gov't" situation. It won't go well for either side but I can only hope that the "us" side wins. The 2nd Amendment was written with that in mind.
    What he said. Sad but true. We all have to prepare to pick sides. I'm getting old and have had a great life. My kids are grown and on their own. My wife would be O.K. financially without me. My choice would be simple.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast