46 Senators voted to give our gun rights over to the UN
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 46 Senators voted to give our gun rights over to the UN

  1. #1

    46 Senators voted to give our gun rights over to the UN

    Recently we came four votes away from the United States Senate giving our Constitutional gun rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms, and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo. Astonishingly, 46 of our United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power. Here are the 46 senators that voted to give your rights to the U.N.

    Baldwin (D-WI)
    Baucus (D-MT)
    Bennet (D-CO)
    Blumenthal (D-CT)
    Boxer (D-CA)
    Brown (D-OH)
    Cantwell (D-WA)
    Cardin (D-MD)
    Carper (D-DE)
    Casey (D-PA)
    Coons (D-DE)
    Cowan (D-MA)
    Durbin (D-IL)
    Feinstein (D-CA)
    Franken (D-MN)
    Gillibrand (D-NY)
    Harkin (D-IA)
    Hirono (D-HI)
    Johnson (D-SD)
    Kaine (D-VA)
    King (I-ME)
    Klobuchar (D-MN)
    Landrieu (D-LA)
    Leahy (D-VT)
    Levin (D-MI)
    McCaskill (D-MO)
    Menendez (D-NJ)
    Merkley (D-OR)
    Mikulski (D-MD)
    Murphy (D-CT)
    Murray (D-WA)
    Nelson (D-FL)
    Reed (D-RI)
    Reid (D-NV)
    Rockefeller (D-WV)
    Sanders (I-VT)
    Schatz (D-HI)
    Schumer (D-NY)
    Shaheen (D-NH)
    Stabenow (D-MI)
    Udall (D-CO)
    Udall (D-NM)
    Warner (D-VA)
    Warren (D-MA)
    Whitehouse (D-RI)
    Wyden (D-OR

    This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take our guns. They need to lose the next election. We have been betrayed. 46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

    President Barack Obama is determined to turn over the guns of American citizens to the United Nations and their minions. But we must ACT right this moment to send a clear-cut message to our Congress—to NOT sign this socialistic treaty!

    President Barack Obama is using emotions and lies to take advantage of FAMILIES AND CHILDERN of horrific and violent events of mentally disturbed people to SELL America that they must forfeit their guns to be safe. Taking away rights and guns from law-abiding citizens will not stop criminals and terrorists from using them!

    He has exploited tragedy after tragedy to bring his anti-gun agenda to the very forefront of American dialogue.

    Many United States Senators have already let their voice be known that they do NOT support this forced gun-grab! However, we must be sure that the majority of senators are in agreement.


    Tell Congress that they must keep the United Nations treaty from our guns! Urge Congress NOT to ratify the UN “Arms Trade Treaty”!

    Demand IT! It is a United States Constitutional right to own a gun according to the Second Amendment! Only days remain to the self-imposed deadline that President Obama gave to himself.

    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  3. #2
    Same senators that have voted on pretty much everything else that is bad for our country. Yet they keep getting re elected.
    Certified NRA Firearms Instructor
    Oklahoma SDA Instructor
    Utah CCW Instructor

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Creswell, Oregon
    What a surprise they are all democrats. The party that loves to take our freedoms away. Yes they will more then likely be re-elected.
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  5. #4
    Baldwin (D-WI) Sorry, she is one of mine. She is a Pelosi wantabe. She is up for reelection in 2016, but there are a lot of liberal progressive Democrats in Madison (madtown), Milwaukee, Green Bay, Racine, Kenosha, Janesville, and every city in the state. I`ll do what I can.
    Even though I walk through the valley of the Shadow of Death, I will fear no Evil, for YOU are with me; Remington 44 Mag:

  6. #5
    Not sure what the vote was for but it takes 67 votes (2/3) in the senate for approval of a treaty so it does not seem anyone's rights were in jeopardy here. Not that those listed are not idiots.
    Si vis pacem para bellum

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    The Constitution (Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2) demands that 2/3rds majority in The Senate approve any treaty.

    Knowing full well there is no way that could happen, this becomes a political vote. Those voting for approval would do so strictly to say they voted with the party. Since the voting wouldn't even be close to meeting constitutional requirements, everybody will have voted on party lines for political cover.

    If only 51 votes were required, I think you would see a very different result with a lot more Democrats voting against.

    By the way...near as I can tell, the president has not submitted this to the Senate yet, and if he has, it has not been voted on.

    Another aside; as I understand the law, even if Senate does not approve the treaty, future senates can take it up until a president withdraws it from consideration. Food for thought.

  8. #7
    "Pork Queen" Murray & Cantwell of WA both signed off on this. No big surprise. Both have consistently voted for giving this country away. All of these traitors swore an oath to defend the constitution. Seems to me, this vote alone should be sufficient evidence to charge every one of these bastards with treason & failure to uphold their oath. How soon can the trials begin?
    What else are they willing to give away?
    The UN is already trying to make any derogatory statements or remarks about Islam illegal. Seens the 4th can't be far behind.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Who realized that this vote was 6 months ago? This vote was done in March of this year. At the time, it did go viral. People I knew did trounce the senator from our state that voted for it, the lying, piece of $h1t liberal shill.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
    ~ Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

  10. The operative words are "Quo Warranto" Latin for, well I don't know latin but I do know that if Quo Warranto charges are brought up on an elected official then the ONLY penalty if they are found guilty [which they should if one looks at their voting record] is removal from office.
    Learn how to bring Quo Warranto charges against your aaaa..... undesirable elected official.
    Be part of the solution, not an ostrich!

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Hog Jaw, Arkansas

    More trolling and lies from Navy Seal.

    This vote, held on March 23, 2013, was about a budget bill not arms control. The UN arms control was added as a rider and everyone knew in advance that it would not pass and was voted on along party lines.

    Kind of like the House voting almost 40 times to repeal AHA, aka ObamaCare, it looks good to your People back home, especially at election time, but it doesn't really amount to anything.

    Like others have posted, since this bill had a treaty item as a rider it had to have 2/3s of the votes "Yea" to pass which everyone knew it would never get.

    Now all the Senators that voted "Yea" or "Nay" can get up on their soapbox during reelection time and proudly claim to their voters that "I voted "X" for a bill that would ___________ ( fill in the blank ).

    Some people, like Navy Seal, are so simple minded that they are very easy to fool.

    I'm so Liberal that I work at the Bill and Hillary Clinton Regional Airport!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts