An interesting article by a conservative on the McCain/Palin ticket
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: An interesting article by a conservative on the McCain/Palin ticket

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650

    An interesting article by a conservative on the McCain/Palin ticket

    I'm not sure how many of you have heard of Charles Krauthammer, but he is well-respected in the conservative community (having won a Pullitzer for distinguished commentary in 1987), and I actually found this article surprisingly insightful, and I found myself agreeing with it throughout.

    Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com :: Incumbents for Change?

  2.   
  3. #2
    Would rather have A vet than an a commie in office.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gray Court, SC
    Posts
    2,934
    Quote Originally Posted by kwo51 View Post
    Would rather have A vet than an a commie in office.
    +1 Any time!
    USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Benefactor
    To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cabot, AR
    Posts
    34
    I like Krauthammer a lot (as long as I don't have to look at him), and he seems like a genuinely intelligent person. I tend to agree with most of what he says, including this article. But I think he contradicts himself a bit by saying first that Palin is inexperienced and has not had time to establish solid positions on major issues, then turning around and saying that she appeals to both the Right Wingers and independents equally. He seems to be arguing that all it takes to appease these people is a pretty face and a little charisma. I can't speak for anyone other than myself as usual, but I could care less about Palin's gender or looks. The fact that she is correct when it comes to energy policy and security are great reasons for me to give her my attention. Her charisma and earthy appeal are just icing as far as I'm concerned. It's more important to me that Conservatives have a representative in the Whitehouse above all the other arguments. McCain is iffy in this respect, and Obama/Biden are the Voltron of anti-Conservativeness.

    Another thing, the experience argument is far from over, I don't know why everyone keeps saying that Palin negates this argument against Obama. Obama is running for President and Palin is not. Palin has been a mayor and Governor. Obama has not. As far as I'm concerned, the Obama/Biden ticket is 100% upside-down with regard to experience. It is the Democrats who picked a celebrity to top their ticket, and an actual qualified politician is on the bottom. McCain/Palin has got it right, as far as I'm concerned.

    As for reform, McCain has demonstrated his willingness to vote against the Republicans on issues that he things are important. (Unfortunately, he picked all the wrong issues to disagree with them on!) If he plays up his willingness to fight his own party when they are wrong, and combines that with Palin's ability to do the same, they might just have a chance. The idea being that if they are willing to stand up to their own party when the party is wrong, they will be able to affect a lot of change in DC in general. Time will only tell if that's enough to lure in the voters, and if they will be able to live up to it!
    "Property is the fruit of labor...property is desirable...is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built."
    -Abraham Lincoln, March 21, 1864

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,650
    Quote Originally Posted by MrRezister View Post
    I like Krauthammer a lot (as long as I don't have to look at him), and he seems like a genuinely intelligent person. I tend to agree with most of what he says, including this article. But I think he contradicts himself a bit by saying first that Palin is inexperienced and has not had time to establish solid positions on major issues, then turning around and saying that she appeals to both the Right Wingers and independents equally. He seems to be arguing that all it takes to appease these people is a pretty face and a little charisma. I can't speak for anyone other than myself as usual, but I could care less about Palin's gender or looks. The fact that she is correct when it comes to energy policy and security are great reasons for me to give her my attention. Her charisma and earthy appeal are just icing as far as I'm concerned. It's more important to me that Conservatives have a representative in the Whitehouse above all the other arguments. McCain is iffy in this respect, and Obama/Biden are the Voltron of anti-Conservativeness.

    Another thing, the experience argument is far from over, I don't know why everyone keeps saying that Palin negates this argument against Obama. Obama is running for President and Palin is not. Palin has been a mayor and Governor. Obama has not. As far as I'm concerned, the Obama/Biden ticket is 100% upside-down with regard to experience. It is the Democrats who picked a celebrity to top their ticket, and an actual qualified politician is on the bottom. McCain/Palin has got it right, as far as I'm concerned.

    As for reform, McCain has demonstrated his willingness to vote against the Republicans on issues that he things are important. (Unfortunately, he picked all the wrong issues to disagree with them on!) If he plays up his willingness to fight his own party when they are wrong, and combines that with Palin's ability to do the same, they might just have a chance. The idea being that if they are willing to stand up to their own party when the party is wrong, they will be able to affect a lot of change in DC in general. Time will only tell if that's enough to lure in the voters, and if they will be able to live up to it!

    You don't think that's true? Furthermore, don't you think that this is how Obama has so much appeal among liberals. He's not being contradictory; rather, he's just explaining it the way it is.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cabot, AR
    Posts
    34
    You may be right. Like I said, I can only speak for myself. It's possible that the lack of exerience/exposure for Obama and Palin may actually accentuate their selling points, to the degree that they haven't had enough time in power to take a lot of contradictory stands on major issues.

    In that regard, I suppose a lack of experience can be seen as a plus by some - the fact that these two have not been immersed in the Washington environment for years upon years But I think that Obama and Palin are liked by their respective fans MORE for what they have said and done. The fact that they are not seen as "Insiders" could certainly serve as a secondary selling point, but not the REASON they are so well liked. I might well be very naive about this, but it seems to me that there are too many people who have too limited an idea of what "experience" means. Palin was elected to her city council in '92, so one might say she's had "experience" as an elected official 5 years before Obama got elected to the Illinois Senate. The point I'm trying to make is that "experience" in this case is mostly relative. Neither has ever been President or Vice-President, so it would be false to say that either really has the experience required for the job they are seeking. I think the reason that these two are as popular as they are has been because of their stances on the issues held important by their constituents/fans/supporters/followers/acolytes/whatever.
    "Property is the fruit of labor...property is desirable...is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and hence is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built."
    -Abraham Lincoln, March 21, 1864

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast