Is Our Military Being Refashioned For Other Purposes?
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Is Our Military Being Refashioned For Other Purposes?

  1. #1

    Is Our Military Being Refashioned For Other Purposes?

    Is Our Military Being Refashioned For Other Purposes?
    by: Allison Martinez
    Is our military being refashioned for some other purpose? How is it that an administration that has failed to fire anyone for the Internal Revenue Scandal, Benghazi, and Fast and Furious seems to be suddenly firing upper military brass left and right?

    While I am not sanctioning misbehavior on the part of top brass, the high crime of fake poker chips does not seem to rise to the same level letting guns walk across the Mexican border. Indeed, it seems that this administration is sending a signal that it is acceptable to spy and harass the American people, sell guns to Mexican drug cartels and leave the border unprotected, allow our diplomatic personnel to be killed, and hire hookers. Lord help you if you believe in patrolling the U.S. border, fire on the Taliban in enemy territory, use a swear word, or attempt to even the odds at a local casino. For these crimes, you can lose your job and spend years in prison.

    Firing on the enemy in hostile territory is not ok, but arming drug cartels to fire on American LEOs is ok? Swearing is not ok, but ignoring the pleas for help from an ambassador is ok?

    Is President Obama planning things that the top brass of the military would not approve? It is well-known that President Obama doesnít believe in missile systems. Of course, this video clip is still in the minds of many Americans.
    In a report filed by Diane Sawyer, the recent firings of upper brass are detailed. Two Star General Michael Carey for personal misbehavior on a business trip. He was the commander of the 20th Air Force and oversaw 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) housed in the United States.

    This comes days after President Obama fired the U.S. Navy Vice Admiral for using fake poker chips at an Iowa casino.
    What is the real reason for these firings? Does President Obama plan to dismantle our nuclear defense capabilities? Does he plan to turn over the United States to global interests rather than sovereign ones? Does he plan on using the U.S. Military for some other purpose? why are there so many foreign troops on U.S. soil? What do all these people share that President Obama hates so much?

    How much worse must it be for our troops? If the President is treating the top brass this way, how much worse must it be for the ranks and file of the military?

    I certainly donít sleep better at night. There is something more behind these firings, and clearly there is some other agenda.

    What is the real reason for these firings? Does President Obama plan to dismantle our nuclear defense capabilities? Does he plan to turn over the United States to global interests rather than sovereign ones? Does he plan on using the U.S. Military for some other purpose? Why are there so many foreign troops on U.S. soil? What do all these people share that President Obama hates so much?

    How much worse must it be for our troops? If the President is treating the top brass this way, how much worse must it be for the ranks and file of the military?

    I certainly donít sleep better at night. There is something more behind these firings, and clearly there is some other agenda.

    Is Our Military Being Refashioned For Other Purposes? - The Free Patriot
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #2
    Naturally there's speculation that these generals and admirals are ones who would have a problem firing on Americans. Most of the reasons given for firing them have been trivial at best. I'm not sure how many there's been now, but I'm guessing upwards of half a dozen at least.
    Do Not Meddle In The Affairs Of Dragons ~ For You Are Crunchy And Good With Ketchup

  4. #3
    Navy Seal Claims Top Brass Asked if They Will Disarm Americans [Video]
    by: Michelle Wright
    Former Navy SEAL Ben Smith warns that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. citizens, a litmus test that includes gauging whether they would be prepared to order troops to fire on Americans.

    Smith provoked headlines last week when he appeared on Fox News to assert that the federal government was trying to provoke veterans into violence as an excuse to implement martial law.

    Speaking exclusively to the Alex Jones Show, Smith stated, “Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side and the questioning….where it was pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens,” adding that this was one of the many “funny things” occurring within the military.

    When Smith was asked by radio host Alex Jones if this line of questioning included a litmus test whereby military officers were asked if they would fire on U.S. citizens, he responded in the affirmative.

    Smith said the litmus test was related to the recent firing of top military commanders Navy Vice Adm. Tim Giardina and Maj. Gen. Michael Carey.

    Smith linked the premise to former Obama advisor Van Jones, who was forced to resign in September 2009 after his links with a Marxist organization were revealed.

    “You drop the radical pose for the radical ends,” said Smith, paraphrasing Van Jones.

    The idea of U.S. soldiers being asked if they will fire on American citizens during a crisis or mass disarmament program has emerged from several different sources over the last two decades.

    In January, 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow claimed he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.

    Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in May 1994 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”

    The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.
    Video:
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast