12 reasons Hillary’s a crook - Page 5
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 57

Thread: 12 reasons Hillary’s a crook

  1. #41
    The Clinton’s Donated $18 Million Dollars to Themselves.
    .
    By Amy Moreno
    .
    The Clinton’s are arguably the most corrupt scam artists in politics.
    .
    Hillary Clinton, who is running for president, is now under her SECOND FBI investigation of the campaign.
    .
    That’s got to be a world record.
    .
    Now, it’s been revealed that the Clinton’s donated $18 million dollars to themselves.
    .
    See below: Milo Yiannopolous ✘ on Twitter: "Between 2007 and 2015 99% of Hillary Clintons Charitable Deductions Went To... Herself? 🤔 https://t.co/b1s4aAWGic https://t.co/9doSk6c7p6"
    .
    Gee, how “charitable” of them.
    .
    It’s interesting to note that the latest FBI probe is involving the Clinton Foundation, or as it’s also known, The Clinton Slush Fund.
    .
    Read More: BOMBSHELL : The Clinton’s Donated $18 Million Dollars to Themselves. – TruthFeed
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #42
    Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
    .
    By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIREAPRIL
    .
    The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”
    .
    The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
    .
    But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.
    .
    At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
    .
    Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
    .
    As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
    .
    And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
    .
    Frank Giustra, right, a mining financier, has donated $31.3 million to the foundation run by former President Bill Clinton, left. Credit Joaquin Sarmiento/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
    .
    At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.
    .
    The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.
    .
    Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.
    .
    In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.
    .
    American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States. In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president, the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s, barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives. That policy stops short of a more stringent agreement between Mrs. Clinton and the Obama administration that was in effect while she was secretary of state.
    .
    Either way, the Uranium One deal highlights the limits of such prohibitions. The foundation will continue to accept contributions from foreign sources whose interests, like Uranium One’s, may overlap with those of foreign governments, some of which may be at odds with the United States.
    .
    When the Uranium One deal was approved, the geopolitical backdrop was far different from today’s. The Obama administration was seeking to “reset” strained relations with Russia. The deal was strategically important to Mr. Putin, who shortly after the Americans gave their blessing sat down for a staged interview with Rosatom’s chief executive, Sergei Kiriyenko. “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20 percent of U.S. reserves,” Mr. Kiriyenko told Mr. Putin.
    .
    Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...=fb-share&_r=0
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    Let’s see, the Clinton’s received all of this money and just by coincidence the State Dept. sign’s off on this deal, which they should have refused to sign off on along with every other government agency that approved of this deal.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  4. #43
    MSNBC: Appointment of Clinton Foundation Donor to Sensitive Intel Board ‘Over the Line.
    .
    MSNBC’s Morning Joe lambasted Hillary Clinton on Monday for one of her senior aides appointing a Clinton Foundation donor to a sensitive intelligence board in the State Department that handles classified material, while Clinton was the secretary of state.
    .
    The donor, Rajiv Fernando, was a stock trader and reportedly had no experience or qualifications in national security affairs. Fernando was put on the International Security Advisory Board by Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills. He had donated extensively to various Democratic candidates and the Clinton Foundation.
    .
    “The Clinton campaign told ABC that Fernando was appointed to the board to reflect a balance of backgrounds and points of view, like, for instance, people that know absolutely nothing about intel. People that know absolutely nothing about nuclear security,” co-host Joe Scarborough said.
    .
    “By the way, rich people who were completely ignorant about this,” he continued. “It was shocking to the people that actually were on that board.”
    .
    “You want to balance qualified with unqualified to get a range of skills,” Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin joked.
    .
    Halperin then discussed how it is normal for high level campaign donors to be appointmented to some positions, especially ambassadorships to less important countries.
    .
    “The Clinton people will say, ‘This is business as usual. Every administration does favors for its donors.’ But this one went over the line,” Halperin said.
    .
    New York Times reporter Nicholas Confessore was also highly critical of the appointment.
    .
    “Why would you put him on this board of all boards?” Confessore said after discussing other positions that donors are often appointed to.
    .
    Video:
    .
    Read More: Appointment of Clinton Foundation Donor to Board ‘Over the Line’
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    This is a perfect example of pay for play with Hillary’s state department. I can’t wait for Sten to say this isn’t a creditable news source.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  5. #44
    -111u.jpg
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  6. #45
    Was that a typo? Didn't you mean 1,200 reasons Hillary is a CROOK?

  7. #46
    -111w.jpg
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  8. #47
    Everything that Hillary has touched has gone to sh!t, Russia, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, Iran and the list goes on. Name me one major bill she got passed while she was a senator for 8 years. Do you consider her having an unauthorized unsecured server in her house having hundreds of above Top Secret items on it, which one of them caused the outing of an Iran nuclear scientist to be hanged because she had it on that unsecured server? Yea she’s done a lot, just ask the men who were killed in Benghazi, Oh yea you can’t can you.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  9. #48
    Wait a minute. Weren't you crying about the "American SPY" being hanged?
    Now, he's an "Iran Scientist".
    He was hanged because we caught him and he cooperated, then ran back to Iran.
    All of which happened before any email that DIDN'T HAVE HIS NAME IN IT.

    Maybe you should drop that irrelevant tidbit from your tireless tirade.
    One piece of misinformation makes it all seem suspect (though it's gonna' be tough to go all the way back to your days as Charles Schumucker and gain credibility).

  10. #49
    I suspect that by the summer of 2017, if you don't own an AR, you never will.
    “Religion is an insult to human dignity. Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.
    But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.” ― Steven Weinberg

  11. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Robgmn View Post
    Wait a minute. Weren't you crying about the "American SPY" being hanged?
    Now, he's an "Iran Scientist".
    He was hanged because we caught him and he cooperated, then ran back to Iran.
    All of which happened before any email that DIDN'T HAVE HIS NAME IN IT.

    Maybe you should drop that irrelevant tidbit from your tireless tirade.
    One piece of misinformation makes it all seem suspect (though it's gonna' be tough to go all the way back to your days as Charles Schumucker and gain credibility).
    He was both, Iran Scientist & American spy that gave info of the inner workings of the Iran nuclear program to the CIA.. The only reason he went back to Iran was they were holding his family and foolishly he went back when they told him that nothing would happen to him if he came back. By Hillary's E-mail referring to him in a E-mail as a friend to the US, sealed his fate, which was done prior to him being hanged. What about the hundreds of other people that were named on those Special Access Programs which were far above Top Secret that were working for the CIA overseas, wouldn't you say there lives have been put in jeopardy because they were on her unauthorized unsecured server that was in her basement.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast