Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary’s Emails - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary’s Emails

  1. #11
    Julian Asange was on Fox & Friends via video com this morning and promised a "October Surprise" against Hillary Clinton. They asked him to give them a little clue as to what it will be. He said absolutely not. He said it would be a big bombshell to Clinton and may end her run.

  2.   
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by SR9 View Post
    Julian Asange was on Fox & Friends via video com this morning and promised a "October Surprise" against Hillary Clinton. They asked him to give them a little clue as to what it will be. He said absolutely not. He said it would be a big bombshell to Clinton and may end her run.
    Let's see how Donald Trump screws this opportunity by annoying yet another voter group. At the moment, Trump seems to target his most loyal voter group by doing a 180 on immigration policy, handing him retaliation threats from Sarah Palin. After all, Donald Trump is running to make sure Hillary wins. An October surprise on the Hilary e-mails will be a difficult task for Trump.

  4. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by GryHounnd View Post
    Your post above exemplifies (that means it's the perfect example, just in case you don't understand big words) the mentality of every Trump supporter out there. It displays a lack of even a basic understanding of what rights the Bill of Rights and the Constitution actually confers, and how it limits our government. It displays rank ignorance of the grossest kind, and is why no one on this board besides Opsspec1991 respects anything you say.
    I am disturbed that anyone in this country somehow finds any reason to defend either of the candidates. I cannot and will not vote for either of these train wrecks.

    But your statement about how government is limited by the constitution is also naive to say the least. The constitution is a tough wall to breach, but it can be breached. All Hillary has to do is load the SCOTUS with people with differing views of what the constitution and BOR actually mean, and much of it can be 're-interpreted'.

    Have your doubts, look at the impact that many of the past close 4-5 or 5-4 decisions have gone, and the impact on the rights of people. Hell they have even elected a president, and look what that did for us. Perhaps this is the butterfly flapping its wings that ultimately gave birth to ISIS. Don't know what a Gore presidency would have meant, but surely not the cluster fork of Iraq, and the mess in the ME.

    With the court currently split 4-4, one appointment is going to have an impact on how the court views our rights. With 4 years in a term the next president will possibly have the opportunity to load to court to lean 3-6 or 6-3 on protecting our rights. (I can't envision either of these people being re-elected after the disaster of their first term)
    “Religion is an insult to human dignity. Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.
    But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.” ― Steven Weinberg

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast