Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary’s Emails
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary’s Emails

  1. #1

    Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary’s Emails

    Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary’s Emails
    .
    Hillary Clinton sending government emails from her private server will look like small potatoes when Americans finally get a look at what was in those emails, as a conservative watchdog group has shown.
    .
    In a move that will shake even the most ardent Hillary supporter, Judicial Watch has published 296 pages of State Department records from Clinton’s time there, including 44 email exchanges that were never turned over. This in direct contradiction to Clinton’s repeated claim that she turned over all relevant materials to investigators, and brings the total number of new emails to 171.
    .
    But the obvious attempt to conceal the newfound emails pales to what is actually described in them. As conservatives have long suspected, the materials prove that Hillary used her position as Secretary of State to grant favors to big-time Clinton Foundation donors as well as campaign loyalists, engaging in political favoritism at a level rarely seen in the modern era.
    .
    From giving special access to campaign insiders to chastising employees for not covering up their tracks, the emails show that the State Department was embedded in corruption from head to toe under Hillary Clinton’s regime.
    .
    The most disturbing revelation, however, is the extent to which individuals seeking to advance particular foreign policy positions sought – and received – an audience with Clinton and her minions:
    .
    “Included in the new document production is a 2009 email in which Band, directs Abedin and Mills to put Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire and Clinton Foundation donor Gilbert Chagoury in touch with the State Department’s ‘substance person’ on Lebanon. Band notes that Chagoury is ‘key guy there [Lebanon] and to us,’ and insists that Abedin call Amb. Jeffrey Feltman to connect him to Chagoury.
    .
    Chagoury is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton and a top donor to the Clinton Foundation. He has appeared near the top of the Foundation’s donor list as a $1 million to $5 million contributor, according to foundation documents. He also pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative. According to a 2010 investigation by PBS Frontline, Chagoury was convicted in 2000 in Switzerland for laundering money from Nigeria, but agreed to a plea deal and repaid $66 million to the Nigerian government.
    .
    Clinton’s top aides’ favors for and interactions with the Clinton Foundation seem in violation of the ethics agreements that Hillary Clinton agreed to in order to be appointed and confirmed as Secretary of State. For example, Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton on January 5, 2009, in a letter to State Department Designated Agency Ethics Official James H. Thessin:
    .
    ‘For the duration of my appointment as Secretary if I am confirmed, I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which The William J. Clinton Foundation (or the Clinton Global Initiative) is a party or represents a party….’
    .
    As preparation for Hillary’s upcoming visit to Asia, Stephen Roach, chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, on Feb. 11, 2009, sends Hillary a copy of his upcoming testimony before Congress in which he would condemn any U.S. efforts to criticize Chinese monetary policy or enact trade barriers. Several days later, Hillary asked Abedin about Roach possibly ‘connecting’ with her while she was in Beijing: ‘I forwarded you my email to him about connecting in Beijing. Can he come to the embassy or other event?’ Morgan Stanley is a long-time financial supporter of the Clintons.”
    .
    Read More:
    Judicial Watch Uncovers 44 More Lies in Hillary's Emails - Truth And Action
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    But didn’t Hillary swear under oath to congress that there wasn’t anything in the 33,000 E-mails she deleted that was work related? Guess not.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #2
    This was released like 2 weeks ago. Yawn.

  4. #3
    So what, it's still going to bite her in the a$$.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  5. #4
    No it won't, simply because Trump has alienated everyone else who might have voted for him except for old white racists, plus his current "pivot" is going to alienate them too.

  6. #5
    I guess we'll see what happens, sure looks like everyday were seeing more of those 33,000 emails that she said was only about her yoga and baby shower coming out showing that she has been lying for a long time and it's coming back to bite her in the a$$.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  7. #6
    It was just reported that the FBI found 15,000 new E-mails from Hillary that she thought she destroyed and said they were not State Dept. related. it's going to come to the point that the DOJ can't keep covering up for her and do their damned job, no matter what Barack want's.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  8. I heard today that emails turned in to a select group of congress was redacted so much no sense could be made of some of them.
    Stuff so secret that the select group was not cleared to see although her lawyers could read them before being deleted.

    Maybe some of them was about hil=LIARy doing her Yoga classes naked. ( an awful picture to see)

  9. #8
    Not only were they redacted so much, they couldn't see them unless they went to a special room where they couldn't have any cell phones, note books or anything which they could take notes on what they saw. Now aren't these the same E-mails that Hillary said weren't work related and didn't need to be turned over to the State Dept. and were unclassified to boot. Sorry all of you Hillary supporters you can't have it both ways.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  10. #9
    I, for the life of me , can't understand anybody on this site being a Hillary Clinton supporter. Let's say you get her elected. Then, she stacks the SCOTUS with Liberal Left Wing judges for life. With a Senate loaded with Lefty's. They get together and do away with the 2nd Amendment and the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. Then the send out the US Military to search your homes and property and seize ALL guns. Notice I said ALL? That is her goal. Then you would not have any sites such as this (USA CARRY) an no where to set and bloviate your troll like blather.
    You've got no guns, no place to *****, and no one to listed to your crap. What will you do? What Will You Do?

    Go ahead and vote for Hillary, and while you are at it, you just as well cut off you....................

  11. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by SR9 View Post
    I, for the life of me , can't understand anybody on this site being a Hillary Clinton supporter. Let's say you get her elected. Then, she stacks the SCOTUS with Liberal Left Wing judges for life. With a Senate loaded with Lefty's. They get together and do away with the 2nd Amendment and the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. Then the send out the US Military to search your homes and property and seize ALL guns. Notice I said ALL? That is her goal. Then you would not have any sites such as this (USA CARRY) an no where to set and bloviate your troll like blather.
    You've got no guns, no place to *****, and no one to listed to your crap. What will you do? What Will You Do?

    Go ahead and vote for Hillary, and while you are at it, you just as well cut off you....................
    You have no IDEA what the Bill of Rights contains do you? As far as you're concerned the 2nd amendment means "we get guns." The 1st amendment means, I have whatever rights they tell me it has. Can you tell me, what do the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, & 14th amendments even say? Can you tell me how Hillary suspending the 1st amendment will legally entitle her boys to storm into your house and take your guns? Can you tell me which of those other amendments she might violate in your presumed narrative of her actions? Can you even fathom why she would have to shred, and rewrite the entire Constitution in order to deploy the military on American soil, and why your scenario is so bizarrely stupid?

    Your post above exemplifies (that means it's the perfect example, just in case you don't understand big words) the mentality of every Trump supporter out there. It displays a lack of even a basic understanding of what rights the Bill of Rights and the Constitution actually confers, and how it limits our government. It displays rank ignorance of the grossest kind, and is why no one on this board besides Opsspec1991 respects anything you say.

    In short, your whole post makes you look like an even bigger idiot than usual.

    Looks like another timeout.

    Calvin
    Last edited by calvin; 08-24-2016 at 09:05 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast