This is where Donald Trump stands on gun control - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: This is where Donald Trump stands on gun control

  1. #11
    Trump has lost this campaign all by himself. Period.

  2.   
  3. #12
    Just out today. It has been found that 96% of all US news media employees vote Democrat and have contributed to the DNC and Hillary Clinton. Now, with that being said, tell me the press isn't in the tank for Hillary?

  4. #13
    Just look at the percentage of Trump articles verse Hillary's E-mail & WikiLeaks articles and you'll see the media is in the tank for Hillary.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by SR9 View Post
    Just out today. It has been found that 96% of all US news media employees vote Democrat and have contributed to the DNC and Hillary Clinton. Now, with that being said, tell me the press isn't in the tank for Hillary?
    Any actual source for that, or is this just a figment of your imagination?

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by opsspec1991 View Post
    Just look at the percentage of Trump articles verse Hillary's E-mail & WikiLeaks articles and you'll see the media is in the tank for Hillary.
    And whose fault is that? Trump's campaign was based from the beginning on the concept of feee media using outrageous remarks and hyperboles. Well, this clown act has worn off now and he is not getting the free media anymore, unless he says something even more stupid than before.

    An actual presidential candidate would run TV ads, social media campaigns, and press conferences with meaningful (and complete) sentences, explaining in detail what his positions are. Trump is incapable of doing that. Instead, we get meaningless tweets. Apparently it will be everyone else's fault when Trump loses, just not Trump's.

    Let's face it, the Republicans wanted a wildcard to run as their Presidential candidate. Now they have to live with the fact that this wildcard turned out to be a dud. Any other Republican Presidential candidate would have wiped the floor with Hillary by now. Trump, though his own actions, managed to make Hillary a viable candidate for many Americans.

    For those that blame the Republican party, please be reminded that the majority of Republicans voted for different candidates. It was up to Trump to unite the party behind him. Instead, his first action after the RNC was to blast fellow Republicans, calling McCain not a hero for being captured in Vietnam, saying Cruz's father was somehow involved in the Kennedy assassination, etc. Trump is the only one to blame when fellow Republicans finally had enough of him and abandon him.

  7. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Any actual source for that, or is this just a figment of your imagination?
    I heard it on Fox & Friends but this is the source. I'm sure you will try to discredit anything you don't agree with.

    96% Of Journalists' Donations To Presidential Campaigns In 2016 Went To Hillary Clinton - Hidden Americans

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    ARIZONA-a short distance from the sun
    Posts
    8,894
    Who is America's greatest threat? Is it the Democratic Party? Socialism? Marxism? ISIS? Obama? Hillary? Trump? The ACLU? Republicans? Immigration? Our 20 TRILLION national debt? Obama Care? Hollywood? The music industry? College institutions? The clueless idiot mobs of 99 percent-ers? Al-Qaeda? Islam? China? Terrorism? The national debt? All of these are looming threats but there is one demonic organization who exceeds all and is the engine behind all of these threats and has the EXPONENTIAL power to alter reality, change perception, mass market deception, slander and half-truths, use demonic euphemisms, scare, frighten, slander and destroy at will globally and nationally 24/7/365. It is none other than the American Main Stream Secular Media!

    The American Mainstream Media and the majority of Washington D.C. are dominated today by a demonic, relativistic, leftist, secular and godless mindset; and it is from this insane asylum that they seek to rule and lead. The ideology and philosophy of the American Leftist Media is based in the basest (lowest) form of thought and rationale. They use partial truths and follow their unbridled passions (lusts) and emotions. They're narcissistic in their heart and subjective to the core. Their moral compass is all out-of-whack because of their complete and total rejection of absolutes (i.e., right and wrong). Since they also reject absolutes they hold themselves to no standard. They have no regard at all for morality, laws (natural/spiritual), personal accountability and responsibility. In every way they are Machiavellian (i.e., believing that the end justifies the means), they promote smut and try to take attention off of the real issues threatening to expose their ever moving liberal progressive NWO agenda.

    ~ RAPTURE...Separation Of Church & State ~
    ~ God Hates Religion ~
    But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    ARIZONA-a short distance from the sun
    Posts
    8,894
    Quote Originally Posted by SR9 View Post
    Just out today. It has been found that 96% of all US news media employees vote Democrat and have contributed to the DNC and Hillary Clinton. Now, with that being said, tell me the press isn't in the tank for Hillary?
    The truth behind positive media for Clinton


    The Center for Public Integrity's mission is "To serve democracy by revealing abuses of power, corruption and betrayal of public trust by powerful public and private institutions, using the tools of investigative journalism." It prides itself as being one of the nations oldest and largest nonpartisan, non-profit Pulitzer Prize winning investigative news organizations. So when it reveals that the vast majority of journalists contributing to the presidential election are supporting Democrat Hillary Clinton, one has to look at the gravity of what is being reported. The Center reports some 430 people who work in journalism have donated about $382,000 to Clinton-that's 96% of all the money donated to both candidates from journalists.

    The results are as would be expected. One example, reported by the Center says, "New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking presidential nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an "ugly and xenophobic campaign." What Nussbaum didn't disclose in her dispatches: she contributed $250 to Democrat Hillary Clinton in April." While $250 doesn't sound like much, it is a statement of tremendous import. In my days of reporting, my personal policy was that I would never show any kind of bias toward a candidate by contributing to the campaign or becoming too cozy with members of a campaign staff.

    We can see that isn't the case in this election. Even Trump mentioned in the last debate that it was three to one against him, a reference to how the so-called "impartial moderators" were favoring Clinton. This comes as no surprise, however, as even a May 2015 poll by Rasmussen suggested that the majority of Americans expect biased coverage. Rasmussen reported, "When it comes to the 2016 presidential campaign, only 23% believe most reporters will try to offer unbiased coverage. Fifty-nine percent (59%) think that coverage will be slanted instead, with 36% who say most reporters will try to help Hillary Clinton during the campaign and 23% who say they will try to hurt her bid for the White House instead."

    There is an old adage that covers just about anything: Follow the money. The money says that journalists favor Clinton by some 96% of the donations they give. And these are just the ones who do not see it as a conflict of interest to give to a political candidate. Those polled thought the media would be slanted, and the contributions by journalists prove it. They wouldn't be giving to Clinton if they didn't support her. That automatically biases anything they would report. As Isaiah 59:14 says, "And justice is turned back, and righteousness stands afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter." Truth, indeed, has fallen in the street, and these so-called "journalists" don't even try to hide their iniquity.

    Bill Wilson - Daily Jot -
    ~ God Hates Religion ~
    But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed.

  10. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by SR9 View Post
    I heard it on Fox & Friends but this is the source. I'm sure you will try to discredit anything you don't agree with.

    96% Of Journalists' Donations To Presidential Campaigns In 2016 Went To Hillary Clinton - Hidden Americans
    Now, was that so hard to provide an actual source? Your original post would have been much stronger if you actually had included your source.

  11. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    SC Lowcountry
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by SR9 View Post
    I heard it on Fox & Friends but this is the source. I'm sure you will try to discredit anything you don't agree with.

    96% Of Journalists' Donations To Presidential Campaigns In 2016 Went To Hillary Clinton - Hidden Americans
    I couldn't find the "About Us" page on their website. How do you know they are credible?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast