Hillary Clinton Just Revealed America's Nuclear Response Time To The Entire World
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Hillary Clinton Just Revealed America's Nuclear Response Time To The Entire World

  1. #1

    Hillary Clinton Just Revealed America's Nuclear Response Time To The Entire World

    Hillary Clinton Just Revealed America's Nuclear Response Time To The Entire World (VIDEO)
    .
    Military experts were shocked during the third and final 2016 presidential debate Wednesday night when Hillary Clinton revealed America's nuclear response time is 4:00 minutes.
    .
    Video:
    .

    .
    Read More:
    .
    https://www.conservativeoutfitters.c...he-whole-world
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    Anyone else catch this? Here ya go America. Go ahead and vote for this woman who canít keep and secure our national secrets.
    .
    Isnít the correct reply to ANYTHING concerning our nuclear program, I cannot confirm or deny etc.
    .
    I am sure she was referring to the nuclear codes under the Lincoln Presidency.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #2
    Here's the funny thing, it's not a closely guarded military secret. Otherwise Foreign Policy Magazine would be in front of a judge for espionage after writing the article i linked to for declaring a national secret in their headline. Anything else you'd like to falsely claim is a national secret?

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Hog Jaw, Arkansas
    Posts
    2,275
    Howdy,

    Gee, anyone that Served within the last 40 years knows this.

    Anyone that practiced NBC drills in the last 40 years knows this.

    This is a well known fact that most sane coherent adults know about.

    Paul
    I'm so Liberal that I work at the Bill and Hillary Clinton Regional Airport!

  5. #4
    One article said the president had four minutes in which to react/respond. I would hope that, during those four minutes, all elements of our response team have been alerted and preparations made to respond within seconds of his order. Since Russia has submarines close to our shores, and aircraft capable of also responding, their times-to-targets could be considerably short. I would hope that we still have early warning systems that will enable us to respond in sufficient time to inflict as much damage to an aggressor as we will suffer. At one time we had a Mutual Assured Destruction doctrine that would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. This doctrine has kept us out of a nuclear war in the past but, given the way our military has been diminished in the past few years, I am not sure we have that assurance any longer. I would actually hope that this is something we will not have to worry about with the current administration still in office.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by Stengun View Post
    Howdy,

    Gee, anyone that Served within the last 40 years knows this.

    Anyone that practiced NBC drills in the last 40 years knows this.

    This is a well known fact that most sane coherent adults know about.

    Paul
    Gee, it looks like you have completely forgotten your training. Not only that, you clearly didn't understand was this was about.

    Those that are actually in this business have only one comment: OPSEC!

    You simply do not talk about such procedures in public. It doesn't matter that the information is not classified and/or already out in the public domain. Leave such discussion to those that are retired and writing their books (which get vetted before release) and to those that write fiction. Do not open up yourself to accidentally reveal classified information or to accidentally reveal unclassified, but important, OPSEC information. Not that Hillary would know anything about safe SECS:

    Hillary Clinton Just Revealed America's Nuclear Response Time To The Entire World-7ea067ab2e88c1b38105433794b7ccbd.jpg

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Hog Jaw, Arkansas
    Posts
    2,275
    Howdy,

    Quote Originally Posted by bofh View Post
    Gee, it looks like you have completely forgotten your training. Not only that, you clearly didn't understand was this was about.

    Those that are actually in this business have only one comment: OPSEC!

    You simply do not talk about such procedures in public. It doesn't matter that the information is not classified and/or already out in the public domain. Leave such discussion to those that are retired and writing their books (which get vetted before release) and to those that write fiction. Do not open up yourself to accidentally reveal classified information or to accidentally reveal unclassified, but important, OPSEC information. Not that Hillary would know anything about safe SECS:

    Hillary Clinton Just Revealed America's Nuclear Response Time To The Entire World-7ea067ab2e88c1b38105433794b7ccbd.jpg
    Holy cow dude!

    We talking about stuff that we were taught in middle school.

    You act like I'm releasing Top Secret info.

    Think tornado and NBC drills from middle school. It's no big secret.

    Paul

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    4,255
    Quote Originally Posted by Stengun View Post
    Howdy,

    Holy cow dude!

    We talking about stuff that we were taught in middle school.

    You act like I'm releasing Top Secret info.

    Think tornado and NBC drills from middle school. It's no big secret.

    Paul
    My point. Hillary wasn't talking about tornado and NBC drills from middle school.

  9. #8
    Sten, if your so smart, you should know that WHENEVER anyone in government service is asked about ANYTHING concerning our important sensitive programs the standard reply is, "I can not confirm or deny" what ever it is. It doesn't matter whether it's been put out in other areas. She doesn't have the authority to talk about ANYTHING concerning our nuclear program.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  10. #9
    It's in the public domain, it's NO SECRET, it's fine to talk about it. Period. It's just like your insane idea that if someone who refuses to say "radical islamic terroist" suddenly says it, that ISIL will suddenly be magically defeated. Any wonder why the republicans have a turd for a candidate?

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    SC Lowcountry
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by MilProG2 View Post
    Here's the funny thing, it's not a closely guarded military secret. Otherwise Foreign Policy Magazine would be in front of a judge for espionage after writing the article i linked to for declaring a national secret in their headline. Anything else you'd like to falsely claim is a national secret?
    I'm trying to see your link but I keep getting pop-up registration requests covering it. :(


    UPDATE:

    Finally got thru to the link. :)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast