Connect the Trump wiretap dots - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Connect the Trump wiretap dots

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by XD40scinNC View Post
    How does one consume that much kool-aid?
    So tell me then, how did someone obtain Flynn's statements from Trump tower to the Russian Ambassador, if not through a wire tap and most of all give this secret info to the news paper.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #12
    There has been sufficient proof brought forward to confirm wire-tapping did occur by Obama and the media has covered it up as well. All Democrats are trying their best to disprove the allegations. Sorry, but it seems as the Imperial Potentate has been caught with his pants down again BUT, only those as crooked as he will try to defend him. The "Resistance" is doing everything they can to make Trump look bad and to have him removed from office. That move is all too transparent since Trump has exposed how the criminal element in our government has been working and the extent the American people have been deceived.

    If, for no other reason, the Democrats will try to remove Trump and have his successor implement Executive Order 13603, National Defense Resources Preparedness. In case some don't remember, this order was signed in 2012 and gives instructions on how the government will take over the country, completely. If that happens, all criminal investigations will stop against the old regime and the crooks will get back to business as usual. We, however, may lose everything we have, i.e., all edible foods can be confiscated by the government, all means of transportation, etc., etc. If any don't understand, read the EO.

    That might sound somewhat far fetched but, not too long ago, what is actually happening today was also considered far fetched. Not so much now. And to think, in addition to all the crooked politicians, we have the most stupid people demonstrating all over the country against Trump. It seems the biggest complaints are about the changing of Obamacare and cutting off funds to Planned Parenthood. They are unwilling to give Trump a chance to improve healthcare and the abortionists are afraid of losing their incomes. Damn, what a world we live in!


  4. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    SC Lowcountry
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldgrunt View Post
    . . .

    If, for no other reason, the Democrats will try to remove Trump and have his successor implement Executive Order 13603, National Defense Resources Preparedness....
    Trump's successor would be Pence. Do they think he would go along with them?

  5. #14
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    330
    OK everyone, hope this clears it up:

    Yes, Trump got spied on. In fact, everyone gets spied on.

    Basically confirmed by 36-year NSA veteran who later became whistleblower.

    See Former NSA Whistleblower: "Trump Is Absolutely Right, Everything Was Being Monitored" | Zero Hedge

    No mystery though, we'd known it for some time.

    And by the way, if you monitored the Cromnibus passage closely a while back (two years ago), you would have seen that everybody is getting unconstitutionally monitored all the time.

    If you have signed up for a service - any service - and thus have left information (user information, password, and other related information) on file with the service provider by way of using said service, then that can be extrapolated over the wire or that can be requested directly from the third party service provider due to warrantless financial surveillance that was authorized as part of the USA cromnibus around two years ago.

    Needs to stop. Has it stopped? No, maybe that is one of the things Trump might want to look into. Will he? Probably not high on his list. A lot of other things have higher priority for his administration.

    by the way:
    Anyone who thinks that Trump will be impeached is delusional. The Dems keep throwing everything up against the wall to see if it will stick, but they must know that it won't. They just want to stop the American people from having the benefit of Trump's agenda (I refer to the Contract with the American Voter, which basically has been "promises kept" on that since day one, so far - which absolutely infuriates the crazed loony left). Right now the House has 237 Republicans to 193 Dems. To bring articles of impeachment against a president requires a majority vote in the House of Representatives. Do the math, people! It wouldn't even get started in the House. If a case were to be tried by the Senate, a vote of at least 2/3 of those present is required to convict and remove the president from office. That Republican dominance in the House is not going away. Senate? 52-46. Again, Dems aren't going to take the Senate back in midterms, either.
    Sorry, not sorry. No impeachment!
    Member, FPC - https://www.firearmspolicy.org/act/
    CZ-52 (Česká Zbrojovka vzor 52), M44 Russian w/Brass Stacker, & 80percenters
    HELP STOP ANTI-2A BILLS! COPY & SHARE THIS LINK: fundrazr.com/018flf

  6. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by freethink View Post
    OK everyone, hope this clears it up:

    Yes, Trump got spied on. In fact, everyone gets spied on.

    Basically confirmed by 36-year NSA veteran who later became whistleblower.

    See Former NSA Whistleblower: "Trump Is Absolutely Right, Everything Was Being Monitored" | Zero Hedge

    No mystery though, we'd known it for some time.

    And by the way, if you monitored the Cromnibus passage closely a while back (two years ago), you would have seen that everybody is getting unconstitutionally monitored all the time.

    If you have signed up for a service - any service - and thus have left information (user information, password, and other related information) on file with the service provider by way of using said service, then that can be extrapolated over the wire or that can be requested directly from the third party service provider due to warrantless financial surveillance that was authorized as part of the USA cromnibus around two years ago.

    Needs to stop. Has it stopped? No, maybe that is one of the things Trump might want to look into. Will he? Probably not high on his list. A lot of other things have higher priority for his administration.

    by the way:
    Anyone who thinks that Trump will be impeached is delusional. The Dems keep throwing everything up against the wall to see if it will stick, but they must know that it won't. They just want to stop the American people from having the benefit of Trump's agenda (I refer to the Contract with the American Voter, which basically has been "promises kept" on that since day one, so far - which absolutely infuriates the crazed loony left). Right now the House has 237 Republicans to 193 Dems. To bring articles of impeachment against a president requires a majority vote in the House of Representatives. Do the math, people! It wouldn't even get started in the House. If a case were to be tried by the Senate, a vote of at least 2/3 of those present is required to convict and remove the president from office. That Republican dominance in the House is not going away. Senate? 52-46. Again, Dems aren't going to take the Senate back in midterms, either.
    Sorry, not sorry. No impeachment!
    With regards to impeachment of Don Cheeto, there is a significant possibility that he will alienate enough of the Republican party with one of his stunts. It is entirely conceivable that the leaders of congress and the senate will conclude they can cut Don Cheeto loose because hes more of a pain then he's worth. They really have nothing to lose agenda wise, they have Pence, Ryan, & McConnell in the line of succession. All of those individuals will be more than happy to sign the same republican legislative garbage that Don Cheeto would sign without making them look like complete and utter clowns like Mr. Cheeto does.

  7. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Reba View Post
    Trump's successor would be Pence. Do they think he would go along with them?
    Unfortunately, yes.

  8. #17
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    330
    Wow, interesting denial of reality, S&W29. I bet you were one of those people who kept claiming that HRC was going to become President from the November election all the way up to the Jan. 20, 2017 inauguration. Of course, you all were wrong about that, just like you are also wrong about the impeachment issue.

    Trump faces no threat from the disappearing Dems.

    By the way, in 2016 - in the months just prior to President Trump being elected -- there were nine times as many Republican landslide counties as Democratic ones (2,232 Republican landslide counties, vs. 242 Democratic landslide counties). Those Republican counties occupy more than half of the United States. That trend is not reversing, it's actually continuing. From 1992 to the present, the growth of Republicans across the countryside has been growing, and growing, and growing, and growing. Basically, the Dems are left with part of California, New York, and some other places in scattered liberal areas about to be extinguished. Americans are getting smart and realizing we can't have crazed, loony lefties running the country.

    We'll soon be rid of Ryan's RINOs, too. Time for people to wake up and face the music. Trump has a solid agenda, and Congress is gradually coming along. Once we kick RINOCARE to the curb and move on the President's budget, we can get some other things done in Congress too (I would remind you that the Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act just passed the House, WILL pass the Senate, and WILL be signed by the President, just like H.J.Res.40 was). Getting rid of Ryan as speaker will just be part of what's next.

    The American people have been waiting for this for a long, long time.
    Member, FPC - https://www.firearmspolicy.org/act/
    CZ-52 (Česká Zbrojovka vzor 52), M44 Russian w/Brass Stacker, & 80percenters
    HELP STOP ANTI-2A BILLS! COPY & SHARE THIS LINK: fundrazr.com/018flf

  9. Quote Originally Posted by opsspec1991 View Post
    So tell me then, how did someone obtain Flynn's statements from Trump tower to the Russian Ambassador, if not through a wire tap and most of all give this secret info to the news paper.
    Did you every think maybe they were conducting electronic surveillance of the Russian Ambassador instead of Trump? I'm trying to figure out why everyone is assuming the surveillance was being conducted on the U.S. end of things when it is much more likely it was being conducted on the Russian end of the communication and whomever was contacting the Russians ended up being recorded as well.
    Anyone who says, "I support the 2nd amendment, BUT"... doesn't. Element of Surprise: a mythical element that many believe has the same affect upon criminals that Kryptonite has upon Superman.

  10. Everyone now knows the government snoops everyone it can. It has been done for years.
    The problem is there has never been leaks like what is going on now.

    I would worry more about WHO leaked over WHAT was leaked.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast